When i open the program, it doesn't load anything and crashes back to desktop. Trying to run it through the command line gives me these errors:
Failed to create Vulkan instance: -9
Failed to create platform Vulkan instance
Unable to detect GPU vendor
The following paths were searched for Qt WebEngine resources:
/share/qt6/resources
/share/qt6
/usr/bin
/home/jjbbss/.anglefish
but could not find any.
You may override the default paths by using the QTWEBENGINE_RESOURCES_PATH environment variable
Aborted (core dumped)
Any ideas
In QT Design Studio, Tab Buttons are mostly for navigation within the UI, but each tab doesn’t automatically hide other content. Usually, a StackView or Loader is needed to switch visible content depending on the active tab.
@Lopher said in Are the example images of padding and inset correct?:
Shouldn't the padding area be between the red Background and the blue Content item? Why does it here refer to the distance directly from the outside to the content area? Is this correct?
Or is my understanding correct? Inset is the distance between a component and the outside, while padding is the distance between the Background and the Content item.
Is that the Control layout diagram? If not, I'm out of wild guesses.
The diagram is correct. The documentation for Control.padding appears to have been written without considering non-0 insets.
test.qml:
import QtQuick
import QtQuick.Controls
Window {
width: 200
height: 100
visible: true
Control {
id: control
anchors.fill: parent
leftInset: 10
leftPadding: leftInset * 2
contentItem: Rectangle {
color: "light blue"
Text {
text: "contentItem.width:" + control.contentItem.width +
"\nbackground.width:" + control.background.width +
"\ncontrol.width:" + control.width
}
}
background: Rectangle { color: "red" }
}
}
[image: 24a08f53-8b8e-4010-96c2-36a64ff9c6e2.png]
It is syntactically correct (just an expression of type void), but it's a case of what I would call "clever code" (not a compliment). It lessens readability and kinda hides the real action in a side effect of an operator for the sake of... yeah, being clever I guess, as it's not even shorter or anything.
Another example of this I've seen is the "clever" use of comma operator:
std::cout << calculate42(), calculate43();
Without looking it up - do you remember what gets printed?
Le [=] n'étant pas nécessaire ici vu qu'il n'y a rien à capturer dans la lambda.
connect(obj1, &MyObject::mySignal , this, [](int arg1){ qDebug() << arg1; });
Please kindly change it to “ntninja”. The old name has SHA-256 hash “27f1e1e6277cc13bfc65294c7af80d2d6bbe23c42eb2ed426547fbe6311e55c4” (no newline in input) and shall not be named, thank you.
