Qt.io webservices

Also your QThread subclass implementation of the run function is missing the exec() call, so your Thread has no running eventloop. Have a look at "this link":http://qt-project.org/wiki/QThreads_general_usage .

In case the Html5ApplicationViewer instance is using any Gui class like e.g. QWebView you won't be able to run instances of this class in any other thread but the main thread. If that is what you wanted to do.

Check that TCL and Qt uses the same technology for drag & drop

Hi

Thanks for your reply actually i request a group use in group request page but still i haven't answer for it that why i asked it again use in that forum.

Thanks

[quote author="mansi" date="1377144318"]Guys,

How do I write a new post ? I dont see any option to create a new post :(

Thanks,
Mansi[/quote]
!http://i.imgur.com/KXPIgs7.png(Button)!

[quote author="sinedie" date="1375627455"]Thank you. :)

I wonder why it is not the default mode for login though.[/quote]
IIRC there have been issues with the secure mode in the past. Some browsers gave warnings, because some content of the pages are not secure.
I think that was the time when it was changed. Probably more a year back, when Alexandra was still in charge (Nokia time?).

[quote author="Hovikoski Markus" date="1374741332"]So sorry for the inconvenience this has caused.[/quote]

That's the way of technology, all is well now, thank you :)

I suggest you report this in the Qt bug tracking system. https://bugreports.qt-project.org/

Thanks, I noticed now that the badge on my profile.

Great. I will close the issue in bugreports as well.

Hi, Im having the same issue, it redirects to http://qt.digia.com/ but not source code is shown.

Thanks
--Allan

Try it ;-)

operator&
is not a operator&=

"September 18, 2012" ;-D

I guess the problem is that this side is seriously under-staffed when it comes to admins:/ It does take way too long to get replies.

IRC sometimes works, I also use the report functionality sometimes (but am not sure how fast those reports are acted upon). And of course there is the component for the website in the bug tracker. That one is most likely the most reliable way to notify admins on issues with the site.

Whoops!

I agree that missing documentation bits make a bad impression.

No need to report this one though, since it's already fixed. But, if you find any more errors in the doc-snapshot.qt-project.org domain, please do file a report at https://bugreports.qt-project.org -- Reports in this forum are hard for the developers to find, and will probably get buried under all the other posts.

Once Qt 5.1 is released (in a few weeks' time), the snapshots will become official documentation at qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.1/

The link should be fixed asap. This really looks bad.

"Bug report QTWEBSITE-527 filed":https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTWEBSITE-527

OK, I have found one possibility on the entry page.
If I remember correctly, this was there before. However, I found the entry in the topline more intuitive.

Sorry for the example, I corrected it before seeing your post

I have reported a bug report on a very similar topic "here":https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTWEBSITE-513. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to have attracted any developer attention so far.
Perhaps some votes from you and others might help?

I encountered a rollback; my post from yesterday got reverted to its previous revision. Perhaps some changes are being made by the admins.

Also, adding whole topic title as tag, is bad idea too.