[quote author="ZapB" date="1311510265"]Glad to hear somebody is finding it useful. ;-)[/quote]
It is really nice! I already love the spinner :)
[quote author="ZapB" date="1311510443"]
So you do not need to implement a destructor in your MainWindow class (the default one will do).[/quote]
OK, fixed. Thanks.
Btw I have performed a couple of other minor and very simple changes at updateSpinner() and paint() which I believe could optimize a little bit the source code. Please when you have time take a look just to make sure I have not ruined anything else unexpectedly with my changes :)
Once you set a docmark it shows in the sidebar and control panel.
If you’re anything like us, you tend to look at the same documentation over and over again while your working on a certain problem. Now you’re able to “docmark” those classes directly on the page and reach them from within the sidebar, regardless of where you are on the Qt Developer Network. You can also remove them by clicking on the little [x] in the sidebar or, alternatively, from your profile control panel.
In a next step we will give you the possibility to make all your “docmarks” publicly visible on your profile if you wish to do so.
bq. It’s good, if you email me I can provide you a decent ftp (home nas for personal use) access to share what can’t be fit in a hosted projects.forum.nokia.com while for the other stuff I create a nokia project. You can be of the team developer crew :)
Ok, this can we do. Which toolchain do you need, x86 or arm? I've got both, with integreated Qt. That means, you can use that toolchain direct without anything else. The x86 version is build with Qt 4.7.0, will be updated propably soon. The arm version is build with Qt 4.7.2, so it's brand new.
And on monday I'm back at work. So let me know, if you are interested in!
It's a bit of a tricky question. So far, the biggest chunk of content is about developing applications with Qt as opposed to developing Qt itself.
"Qt Development" felt pretty clear to me (similar to "Web Development" for example). I am not sure if we don't confuse more people by naming the category like this which is dealing with the development of the libraries themselves...
In conclusion: I don't know either. At least not right now. If you can give me some time, chances are good that it changes. :P
[quote author="Volker" date="1295262975"]But why not let the computer do the work instead of manually searching for the changes. In the email diff you can check if the change is important for you or just, say, corrects some whitespace or spelling error. I would definitely prefer the more verbose email.[/quote]
Also, you made me think of something else: it could be useful to have a Minor edit button when editing, to say that we're not changing the whole article, just correcting a typo or so (just like Wikipedia, for example). And the subscribers would have the choice of being notified of such minor edits or no.