QThread with multiple methods

[JohnCu]

Hi, I have a problem with threading. I have QMainWindow gui class, which handles also real-time plot after receiving signal from workers class. The problem is with QTread-based class (workers class), because i have multiple methods which performs computation, before emitting the signal to gui class. How run() method should look like in this situation? I am little confused, because in all examples and Qt tutorials shows, that there is one method, called from gui class, which calls start(). Then, computation itself is located in run() function. It would be ok, if I had only one method to be handled (I would then place it inside run() loop). Of course I can connect each of the method to slot, and emit a signal every time a exact button in gui is initiating computation, but it does not seem to be an optimal solution. I would like to call such functions from gui class directly (not via emitting a signal), maintaining workers thread responsive.
Thank you for your responses!

[J.Hilk]

@JohnCu
take a look at the Documentation and the detailed description:
https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qthread.html#details

Take a look at the first example, that's what you want. (Most likely)

[JohnCu]

@J-Hilk Thank you for your suggestion, but my problem still exists. I have implemented code similar to first example in the documentation. Situation is as follows: workers thread emits a signal, which launches socket function which is responsible for plotting data, but debugger shows that this function code is still launched by this thread. Moreover, I recieve an exception, Exception thrown at 0x00007FFAEDA8B27A (Qt5Cored.dll) in App.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0x0000000000000008.
I have set Qt::DirectConnection to this signal-slot connection, otherwise it doesnt work. Shouldn't it be launched by main thread? How to achieve this?

[Christian Ehrlicher]

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

I have set Qt::DirectConnection to this signal-slot connection

How should a thread context switch happen then?
Please provide a minimal example so we can take a look on it

[JohnCu]

@Christian-Ehrlicher
Here you have a maximally simplified code, which does not contain any sophisticated algorithm, just the problematic part:

App.h code"

#pragma once

#include <QtWidgets/QMainWindow>
#include "ui_App.h"
#include "worker.h"
#include <vector>
#include <QMessageBox>
#include <qfiledialog.h>
#include <qlistwidget.h>
#include <qfuture.h>
#include <QCoreApplication>
#include <QtConcurrent/qtconcurrentrun.h>
#include <QThread>
#include <qwt_plot.h>
#include <qwt.h>
#include <Qwt_Legend.h>
#include <Qwt_Plot_Grid.h>
#include <Qwt_Plot_Curve.h>
#include <Qwt_Symbol.h>
#include <direct.h>
#include <algorithm>
#include <qmainwindow.h>
#include <qtoolbar.h>
#include <qtoolbutton.h>
#include <qcombobox.h>
#include <qslider.h>
#include <qlabel.h>
#include <qcheckbox.h>
#include "plot.h"
#include "qwt_color_map.h"
#include <string>
#include <cctype>
#include <fstream>
#include <iostream>
#include <QDebug>

class App : public QMainWindow
{
	Q_OBJECT
	QThread workerThread;
public:
	// methods
	App(QWidget *parent = Q_NULLPTR);	
	~App();
private:
	// methods
	void disable_all_buttons();
	
	// variables
	Worker worker_obj;
	Plot* plot = new Plot("plot");
	Ui::App_GUIClass ui;

signals:
	void onConnecttoHardware();
	void onRun();

public slots:
	void enable_all_buttons();
	void plot_results();

private slots: 
	void on_Run_triggered();
};

App. cpp code:

#include "App.h"

App::App(QWidget *parent)
	: QMainWindow(parent)
{
	ui.setupUi(this);
	
	// <- prepare gui

	worker_obj.moveToThread(&workerThread);
	connect(&workerThread, &QThread::finished, &worker_obj, &QObject::deleteLater);
	// signals from worker_obj and slots in App
	connect(&worker_obj, &Worker::on_enable_buttons, this, &App::enable_all_buttons);
	connect(&worker_obj, &Worker::update_plot, this, &App::plot_results, Qt::DirectConnection);
	// signals from App and slots in worker_obj
	connect(this, &App::onRun, &worker_obj, &Worker::acquire_data, Qt::BlockingQueuedConnection);
	connect(this, &App::onConnecttoHardware, &worker_obj, &Worker::connect_to_hardware, Qt::BlockingQueuedConnection);
	workerThread.start();
}

void App::on_Run_triggered()
{
	disable_all_buttons();
	QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Prepare hardware");

	emit onConnecttoHardware();

	// if connected to hardware
	QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Hardware connected");

	emit onRun();
			
	QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Operation succesful");
}

App::~App()
{
	delete plot;
	workerThread.quit();
	workerThread.wait();
}

void App::enable_all_buttons() {
	// enable all gui buttons
}
void App::disable_all_buttons() {
	// disable all gui buttons
}

void App::plot_results()
{
	//QMutex mutex;
	//mutex.lock();

	QHBoxLayout* myLayoutTrans = new QHBoxLayout(ui.tabWidgetResults->widget(3)); // modify 4th tab in gui
	myLayoutTrans->addWidget(plot);
	int current_tab_index;
	current_tab_index = ui.tabWidgetResults->currentIndex();

	ui.tabWidgetResults->widget(3)->setLayout(myLayoutTrans);
	plot->Update_plot("y axis", worker_obj.hard_obj->result_x1,
		worker_obj.hard_obj->result_y1, worker_obj.hard_obj->result_x2,
		worker_obj.hard_obj->result_y2,	1000);

	delete myLayoutTrans;
	//mutex.unlock();
}

worker.h code:

#include "hardware_control.h"
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <sstream>
#include <armadillo>
#include <QThread>
#include <QObject>
#include <QtCore>
#include <cstdio>
#include <memory>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>
#include <array>
#include <chrono>
#include <thread>
#include <stdlib.h>

class Worker: public QObject
{
	Q_OBJECT
public:
	// methods
	explicit Worker(QObject *parent=0);
	~Worker();

	Hardware_control* hard_obj = new Hardware_control();

signals:
	void on_enable_buttons();
	void update_plot();

public slots:
	void acquire_data();
	void connect_to_hardware();

private:
	QMutex mutex;
	QWaitCondition condition;
	bool quit;
};

worker.cpp code:

#include "worker.h"

Worker::Worker(QObject *parent){
}

Worker::~Worker()
{
	delete hard_obj;
}

void Worker::connect_to_hardware()
{
	// connects to hardware via serial port
}

void Worker::acquire_data() {
	// getting data from hardware

void Worker::acquire_data() {
	// getting data from hardware

	while (!end) {
		hard_obj->tune_hardware(); // takes from 10ms to 5s
		while (more_data_required) {
			hard_obj->get_data_from_hardware(); // takes about 10ms
			hard_obj->get_results();

			emit update_plot();

			// do some calculations

			hard_obj->get_data_from_hardware(); // takes about 10ms
			hard_obj->get_results();

			emit update_plot();
		}
	}
	emit on_enable_buttons();
}

hardware_control.h code:

#pragma once
#include "hardware_control.h"
#include <QFile>
#include <QDir>
#include <armadillo>

class Hardware_control
{
public:
	Hardware_control();
	~Hardware_control();
	
	void get_data_from_hardware();
	void get_results();
	void postprocess_data();
	void download_results();
	void tune_hardware();

	double* result_x1, * result_y1;
	double* result_x2, * result_y2;


signals:
	void update_plot();

private:
	int port_number;
	arma::vec hardware_output_x, hardware_output_y;
};

hardware_control.cpp code:

#include "hardware_control.h"

Hardware_control::Hardware_control() {
	hardware_output_x = arma::zeros<arma::vec>(1000);
	hardware_output_y = arma::zeros<arma::vec>(1000);
	result_y1 = new double[1000];
	result_x1 = new double[1000];
	result_y2 = new double[1000];
	result_x2 = new double[1000];
}

Hardware_control::~Hardware_control() {
	delete[] result_y1;
	delete[] result_x1;
	delete[] result_y2;
	delete[] result_x2;
}

void Hardware_control::tune_hardware()
{
	// tune hardware before getting result data
}

void Hardware_control::get_data_from_hardware() {
	// gets hardware_output_x & hardware_output_y from hardware
	for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
		hardware_output_x[i] = get_hardware_response_x(i);
		hardware_output_y[i] = get_hardware_response_y(i);
	}
}

void Hardware_control::download_results() {
	for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
		result_x1[i] = hardware_output_x[i];
		result_y1[i] = hardware_output_y[i];
	}
}

void Hardware_control::get_results() {
	// data postrpocess based on the data previously obtained from hardware
	postprocess_data();

	download_results();
}

void Hardware_control::postprocess_data() {
	// transforms hardware_output_x & hardware_output_y into result_x2 & result_y2
	for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
		result_x2[i] = postprocess_x(hardware_output_x[i]);
		result_y2[i] = postprocess_y(hardware_output_y[i]);
	}
}

Plot.h code:

#include <qwt_plot.h>
#include <qwt_plot_zoomer.h>
#include <qwt_plot_panner.h>
#include <qwt_plot_grid.h>
#include <qwt_plot_curve.h>
#include <qwt_symbol.h>
#include <qwt_plot_canvas.h>


class Plot : public QwtPlot
{
	Q_OBJECT

public:

	Plot(std::string type);//sets up plot 
	~Plot();
	void Update_plot(const QString& title, const double X_val[1601 * 16], const double Y_val[1601 * 16], const double X2_val[1601 * 16], const double Y2_val[1601 * 16], int number);
	void detach_curve();

protected:
	//QwtPlotCurve * curve_;

private:
	double max_Y_val, max_Y2_val;
	double min_Y_val, min_Y2_val;
	QwtSymbol* symbol;
	QwtPlotGrid* grid;
	QwtPlotCurve curve1, curve2;
	QwtPointSeriesData* myData, *myData2;
	QVector<QPointF> samples;
	QVector<QPointF> samples2;
	QwtPlotCanvas* canvas;
	QwtPlotZoomer* zoomer;
	QwtPlotPanner* panner;
	bool if_update_plot;
};

Plot.cpp code:

#include "plot.h"

class MyZoomer : public QwtPlotZoomer
{
public:
	MyZoomer(QWidget *canvas) :
		QwtPlotZoomer(canvas)
	{
		setTrackerMode(AlwaysOn);
	}

	virtual QwtText trackerTextF(const QPointF &pos) const
	{
		QColor bg(Qt::white);
		bg.setAlpha(200);

		QwtText text = QwtPlotZoomer::trackerTextF(pos);
		text.setBackgroundBrush(QBrush(bg));
		return text;
	}
};

Plot::Plot(std::string type)
{
	if_update_plot = false;
	setObjectName("plot");
	setAxisTitle(xBottom, "x axis");
	setAxisScale(yLeft, -150, 0);


	QwtPlotCanvas *canvas = new QwtPlotCanvas();
	canvas->setPalette(Qt::white);
	canvas->setBorderRadius(10);

	setCanvas(canvas);

	// grid
	grid = new QwtPlotGrid();
	grid->attach(this);

	zoomer = new QwtPlotZoomer(canvas);
	zoomer->setRubberBandPen(QColor(Qt::black));
	zoomer->setTrackerPen(QColor(Qt::black));
	zoomer->setMousePattern(QwtEventPattern::MouseSelect2,
		Qt::RightButton, Qt::ControlModifier);
	zoomer->setMousePattern(QwtEventPattern::MouseSelect3,
		Qt::RightButton);

	panner = new QwtPlotPanner(canvas);
	panner->setMouseButton(Qt::MidButton);
	this->setAutoReplot(true);
	replot();
}

Plot::~Plot()
{
	delete zoomer;
	delete panner;
	if (if_update_plot == true) {
		delete grid;
	}
}

void Plot::Update_plot(const QString& title, const double X_val[1601 * 16], const double Y_val[1601 * 16], const double X2_val[1601 * 16], const double Y2_val[1601 * 16], int number)
{
	if_update_plot = true;
	max_Y_val = -200;
	min_Y_val = 0;
	max_Y2_val = -200;
	min_Y2_val = 0;
	double min_f = 0, max_f = 0;
	myData = new QwtPointSeriesData;
	myData2 = new QwtPointSeriesData;

	// clear samples
	for (int i = 0; i < samples.length(); i++) {
		samples.pop_back();
	}
	while (samples.length() > 0) {
		samples.pop_back();
	}
	for (int i = 5; i < number; i++) {
		if (Y_val[i] != 0) {
			samples.push_back(QPointF(X_val[i]/1e9, Y_val[i]));
			if (max_Y_val < Y_val[i]) {
				max_Y_val = Y_val[i];
			}
			if (min_Y_val > Y_val[i]) {
				min_Y_val = Y_val[i];
			}
			max_f = std::ceil(X_val[i]);
			if (min_f == 0) {
				min_f = std::floor(X_val[i]);
			}
		}
	}
	// clear samples2
	for (int i = 0; i < samples2.length(); i++) {
		samples2.pop_back();
	}
	while (samples2.length() > 0) {
		samples2.pop_back();
	}
	for (int i = 5; i < number; i++) {
		if (Y2_val[i] != 0) {
			samples2.push_back(QPointF(X2_val[i] / 1e9, Y2_val[i]));
			if (max_Y2_val < Y2_val[i]) {
				max_Y2_val = Y2_val[i];
			}
			if (min_Y2_val > Y2_val[i]) {
				min_Y2_val = Y2_val[i];
			}
		}
	}

	curve1.detach();
	curve2.detach();
	grid = new QwtPlotGrid();
	grid->attach(this);

	myData->setSamples(samples);
	curve1.setStyle(QwtPlotCurve::Lines);
	curve1.setPen(Qt::blue, (2.0), Qt::SolidLine);

	myData2->setSamples(samples2);
	curve2.setStyle(QwtPlotCurve::Lines);
	curve2.setPen(Qt::red, (1), Qt::SolidLine);

	setAxisScale(yLeft, std::floor(min_Y_val), std::ceil(max_Y_val));
	setAxisScale(xBottom, min_f/1e9 - 0.000001, max_f/1e9 + 0.000001);
	setAxisTitle(yLeft, title);

	curve1.setData(myData);
	curve1.attach(this);
	curve2.setData(myData2);
	curve2.attach(this);
	this->replot();
}

void Plot::detach_curve()
{
	curve1.detach();
}

[Christian Ehrlicher]

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

connect(&worker_obj, &Worker::update_plot, this, &App::plot_results, Qt::DirectConnection);

This is wrong and will lead to crashes. Also the blockingQueued stuff is not needed - at least I don't see a need for it. Apart from that your code does not compile.

[JohnCu]

@Christian-Ehrlicher Please take look one more time at Worker::acquire_data(), because i have forgotten to add something significant. Plot needs to be updated before stepping into subsequent line, because then, some calculations are taking place, which modify vectors used to visualize results. I have also added plot class
When i dont set Qt::DirectConnection the algorithm goes well, but as a result i have multiple plot of the same vector, and the data is the one acquired just before showing gui information message. So to sum up, i click run in gui, then some data is acquired multiple times and after a while, both result and gui msgbox appear.
It would be hard for you to compile it, because you dont have the hardware necessary to generate the result vectors. Moreover, a algorithm (in worker class) is sophisticated, and would make whole code hard to be analyzed. Thats why i isolated the problem and passed it like this.

[Christian Ehrlicher]

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

Please take look one more time

You still not fixed my comments. DirectConnection is wrong!

[JohnCu]

@Christian-Ehrlicher said in QThread with multiple methods:

DirectConnection

I understand, at first there was no connection specifier in this connect call. In previous post I described what happened then. So do you see any solution for mentioned problem?

[Christian Ehrlicher]

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

So do you see any solution for mentioned problem?

Don't use blocking and direct connections when working with threads. I don't see a problem calling a slot when a push button is pressed inside the thread which then triggers the execution.

[JohnCu]

@Christian-Ehrlicher The situation is as follows, I want to have my gui responsible all the time, but workers thread needs to emit signal to gui in order to plot the results. And the results needs to be ploted before subsequent step in workers thread. Now, data is plotted while app gets stucked on gui msgbox. I mean, when I dont use blocking and direct connections for update plot.

[Christian Ehrlicher]

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

And the results needs to be ploted before subsequent step in workers thread.

But why? But I don't care - simply emit another signal once the plotting is done so your thread can continue to calculate.

[JohnCu]

@Christian-Ehrlicher Ok, I will try. Thank you anyway, for all of your replies :)

[JohnCu]

@Christian-Ehrlicher One more thing. I have menaged to handle stuff in workers thread (after emitting signal which initiates plotting, workers thread waits for succesful visualization), but there is still a problem in on_Run_triggered() method in App.cpp. After initiating result acquisition (emit onRun();) the main thread also needs to wait till operation is finished. Moreover, gui needs to be responsible all the time. When i create here a loop, which waits for signal from
workers class, the gui thread is stucked in this loop and visualization in gui is impossible. Are there any methods which, will enable me to have responsible thread (in order to plot according to signal from worker), but paused on emit onRun() line?

[Christian Ehrlicher]

Show a modal wait dialog.

[JohnCu]

@Christian-Ehrlicher But does not a modal wait dialog assume, that everything, except this dialog window is unable to be clicked? I want to achieve both gui responsibility and live data visualization.
For now I have a following loop:

{
	QEventLoop loop;
	loop.connect(&workers_obj, SIGNAL(on_ready()), SLOT(quit()));
	QFuture<void> future;
	future = QtConcurrent::run(&this->workers_obj, &Worker::acquire_data);
	loop.exec();
}

Here I use on_ready() signal generated at the end of acquire_data() method. Everything works fine, until I want to cancel computation in worker thread. It leads to null-pointer access etc.

[Christian Ehrlicher]

You wanted to wait in the main dialog (for whatever reason) - I told you a solution.
Now you tell me you won't block the ui - so don't block it and connect a slot to the finished signal of the thread.

[JohnCu]

@Christian-Ehrlicher Ok, let me explain the situation one more time. I launch a function from a gui thread (gui class code). Then i need to wait for the function to finish its job, before i go to a subsequent line. However, mu gui thread event loop needs to be active all the time, in order to enable data plotting. I can not freeze gui thread, I need to have it responsible, but it needs to be waiting in a line of launching function from workers object. There should be something like "do subsequent line, but first perform action prompted by an indicated signal". For now it is handled in a loop mentioned before, but I know, that it is not an optimal solution...

[Christian Ehrlicher]

Again: connect a signal which is emitted from the thread when the first part is finished. Connect this signal to a slot in the gui thread which does the work you need to do in the gui thread which then emits another signal to do the next work in the thread.

[JohnCu]

@Christian-Ehrlicher Yes, I added such signal. But how should I check if the signal was emitted? I can not do a while loop, which constantly checks whether signal was emitted, because gui thread will be locked in such loop. Maybe you meant something else?

[J.Hilk]

@JohnCu you don't need to check that yourself

simply connect a slot to the signal, as soon as it is emitted and your main application is in no loop (infinite loop for example) the slot will be called!

[JohnCu]

@J-Hilk Yes, but my workers thread computation are a little bit time consuming, and I need to be sure, that before going to subsequent line in gui code (just after launching computation on workers thread) the computations are done. Your approach would work, if there is no more code in function, inside which workers thread method is launched.

[J.Hilk]

@JohnCu
I don't see the problem, YOU decide when the signal is emitted inside your code, don't you?

Emit the allDone signal when you're all done, and not before

[JohnCu]

@J-Hilk Yes, of course, there is no problem with emitting a signal from workers thread, I do it when computations are done. But, take look at this code from gui class:

emit onConnecttoHardware();

// if connected to hardware
QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Hardware connected");

First i launch action, then i show, that it is finished. however, after emitting a signal to start the action, the main thread goes straight to show QMessageBox, which can not be prompted before computations are done... I need to wait at the first line of this code to obtain allDone signal and have my gui responsible while waiting, because i need to plot some results, which are also prompted by a signal emitted from workers thread. If I do as you suggested, main thread displays messagebox immediately, before action finished (allDone signal is emitted)...

[aha_1980]

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

I need to wait at the first line of this code to obtain allDone signal and have my gui responsible while waiting,

And this, you have to understand, is a discrepance.

You cannot wait in GUI threads.

What you probably want to do is, to disallow user input until the allDone signal is received. And that's how it's usually done in professional apps.

You most likely also want your user to be able to abort the process, in case something goes wrong. All that is impossible if the GUI thread stucks.

Regards

[J.Hilk]

@JohnCu

add the following signals to your worker

signals:
	void on_enable_buttons();
	void update_plot();
//new
       void onHardwareConnected();
       void onOperationSuccesfull

Connects in your App.cpp

connect(&worker, &Worker:: onHardwareConnected, this, App:: onRun);
connect(&worker, &Worker:: onHardwareConnected, this, [=]()->void{QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Hardware connected");});
connect(&worker, &Worker:: onOperationSuccesfull, this, [=]()->void{
     QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Operation succesful");
     enable_all_buttons();
});

void App::on_Run_triggered()
{
	disable_all_buttons();
        emit onConnecttoHardware();
	QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Prepare hardware");
}

something like this could work

[JohnCu]

@aha_1980 said in QThread with multiple methods:

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

I need to wait at the first line of this code to obtain allDone signal and have my gui responsible while waiting,

And this, you have to understand, is a discrepance.

You cannot wait in GUI threads.

What you probably want to do is, to disallow user input until the allDone signal is received. And that's how it's usually done in professional apps.

You most likely also want your user to be able to abort the process, in case something goes wrong. All that is impossible if the GUI thread stucks.

Regards

Yes, that is exactly what I want. I know, that I cannot block a GUI thread. So how would you solve this problem? I just want this thread to respond for incoming signals, which will finally allow to step it to subsequent line. I want to tell compiler "stay here, process incoming signals and continue to subsequent line (within this method), as soon as indicated signal will be emitted"

@aha_1980 said in QThread with multiple methods:

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

I need to wait at the first line of this code to obtain allDone signal and have my gui responsible while waiting,

And this, you have to understand, is a discrepance.

You cannot wait in GUI threads.

What you probably want to do is, to disallow user input until the allDone signal is received. And that's how it's usually done in professional apps.

You most likely also want your user to be able to abort the process, in case something goes wrong. All that is impossible if the GUI thread stucks.

Regards

Thanks, it would work if there is only one function called from on_Run_triggered() method, but there are more:

void App::on_Run_triggered()

{
disable_all_buttons();
QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Prepare hardware");

emit onConnecttoHardware();

// if connected to hardware
QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Hardware connected");

emit onRun();
		
QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Operation succesful");

}

The problem is, that I cannot emit onRun() before I am not sure if hardware was connected properly... Based on your responses, the only way to make it work (besides QEventLoop, that I mentioned before, however it is not safe) would be to split on_Run_triggered() method and place rest of the code into another method, which would be called via slot after getting allDone signal? So after calling first method, a main gui thread will exit on_Run_triggered() and will be waiting for subsequent signal emissions i.e. allDone. am I right?

I think, a similar problem was described here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3556421/blocked-waiting-for-a-asynchronous-qt-signal

[J.Hilk]

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

would be to split on_Run_triggered() method and place rest of the code into another method, which would be called via slot after getting allDone signal? So after calling first method, a main gui thread will exit on_Run_triggered() and will be waiting for subsequent signal emissions i.e. allDone. am I right?

In essence, yes!

[JohnCu]

@J-Hilk I wanted to avoid such approach, because it will totally ruin my code structure, but if it is necessary...

[aha_1980]

@JohnCu

I'm about giving up with you!

I want to tell compiler "stay here, process incoming signals and continue to subsequent line (within this method), as soon as indicated signal will be emitted"

And that is exactly what is not possible. Forget it.

I think, a similar problem was described here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3556421/blocked-waiting-for-a-asynchronous-qt-signal

Don't do that. You will regret it.

As said multiple times: don't block the GUI thread. Let it run free.

Regards

[JohnCu]

@aha_1980 I am sorry for testing your patience ! I will locate the code in a separate methods, in order not to block gui thread. However, thank you for your advice!

[aha_1980]

@JohnCu No problem.

I know making your head up with async programming is hard in the beginning.

But it will get better :)

[JKSH]

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

@J-Hilk I wanted to avoid such approach, because it will totally ruin my code structure, but if it is necessary...

It is very necessary. Do not try to take the easy way out.

Think of it this way: You are not ruining your code structure, you are improving it to become a responsive, event-driven structure.

To do asynchronous/event-driven programming (responding to signals/events from other threads), you must think differently and structure your code differently.