Thanks for the suggestion. I've found tree models difficult to work with in the past so am somewhat reluctant to use them here. Any thoughts on the second approach I suggested?
@cristian-adam said in Qt 6 compiles twice slower that Qt 5:
But, the libraries are not there. See https://arewemodulesyet.org/ for the amazing progress that is being done by the community.
This is gold :D
Estimated finish in 2344
@Qt6User said in Missing DLLs in Qt 6.8.1:
Meanwhile do you know which module I should select if i want to build Qt 6.8.1 from source using cmake?
You build the module(s) you want to use...
You can either make a complete build and include all modules, which might take some time and increases your installation size or you build exactly the modules you plan to use.
Hi,
Why not use a setup like with embedded systems ? You build on PC A and then copy the executable and relevant libraries on PC B and do remote debugging.
@Mark-K-R-Walker
If your header really looks like you showed us, it's no wonder you get compile errors:
#ifndef SOUND_H
#define SOUND_H
...
class Sound : public QIODevice
{
Q_OBJECT
private:
QMediaDevices *AllMediaDevices = nullpointer;
QAudioDevice DefaultAudioOutputDevice;
public:
Sound();
}; // <- Closing curly brace and semicolon are missing!
#endif // SOUND_H
Please add the }; before the #endif and try again.
Regards
@inbilla hi,
Are you using custom models ?
If so, are you also taking advantage of the last argument of the dataChanged signal ? This one limits the roles that the view should get data for in order to update itself.
