@SGaist I am not, I'm using "proper" bindings by KDAB. (I did try out Qt Bridges but it's extremely limited compared to C++.)

Hi, I think you should open a feature request on the bug tracker to discuss this. This forum is more user oriented.

Hi, Are you sure that it's not the network that is the bottleneck ? VNC is not exactly optimized for in terms of bandwidth. You might also want to check if you can tune the Xnvc server configuration to optimize for your use case.

I still think the wording is open to my interpretation, however I have now defined my own convenience macro: // // Define a convenience macro for checking if we're using a Qt GUI or command line application // #define qtGUI (dynamic_cast<QApplication *>(QCoreApplication::instance()))

@hello_tyggylpp I know nothing about this. But: You say your file is "incomplete" and stops at QMAKE_GCC_PATCH_VERSION. You say the "complete" file should have QMAKE_CXX.INCDIRS = ... next. You can see that the value for that as shown in your paste is "clearly" (at least to me) wrong QMAKE_CXX.INCDIRS = C:/Qt/Qt5.14.2/Tools/mingw730_64/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/7.3.0/include/c++ C:/Qt/Qt5.14.2/Tools/mingw730_64/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/7.3.0/include/c++/x86_64-w64-mingw32 \ C:/Qt/Qt5.14.2/Tools/mingw730_64/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/7.3.0/include/c++/backward C:/Qt/Qt5.14.2/Tools/mingw730_64/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/7.3.0/include C:/Qt/Qt5.14.2/Tools/mingw730_64/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/7.3.0/include-fixed C:/Qt/Qt5.14.2/Tools/mingw730_64/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include I have copied & pasted what you have written/pasted. You should always paste code/output into this forum inside the forum's code tags (the </> toolbar button or inside ``` or ` blocks). I suggest you repaste "the complete .qmake.stash file:" using the correct tags/verbatim if you want you/us to see whether it is indeed incorrect as it currently appears to be.

Hi, I have submitted the bug report on Jira along with a minimal reproducible example and screenshots: https://qt-project.atlassian.net/browse/QTBUG-152112 Thank you for your guidance!

I'm based in Sweden and got the Azure Trusted Signing in August 2024, I think it started that year and was avaiable globally. Then they restricted it to US and Canada as you say, maybe start of 2025? But it should be globally available again now.. (Those blog posts I linked to above contain useful info.)

yep. really cool. will try later ... curious: years ago, as I switched from BlackBerry10 (Cascades/Qt 4.8) to Qt 5 (QuickControls2) I really missed the GroupDataModel from Cascades, where I could do things like this: import bb.cascades 1.2 ListView { dataModel: GroupDataModel { sortingKeys: ["lastName", "firstName"] sortedAscending: true grouping: ItemGrouping.ByFirstChar } } great to see what's now possible with Qt QML - THX :)

I don't know the exact tag/commit that was used for this release, but this is what I know: Qt WebEngine (and Qt PDF) have been split from Qt, with an independent release cycle: https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-webengine-will-release-separate Qt WebEngine/PDF 6.140.0 has not been released yet Qt for Python has not performed the same split yet; Qt for Python 6.12.0 inadvertently shipped with a pre-release version of Qt WebEngine/PDF I believe this should be rectified soon

hey Joe - it doesn't seem to change the ACP chat window in Creator. I can zoom everything, of course, but that's not what I want.

A different post I replied to surfaced a different idea: On Linux we are distributing our app as AppImage. This will package all dependencies into an executable image. It is not the ideal solution for Linux, but if you have a small software that is not included in official repositories of the distros it is the much better option for maintainability. This would package both Qt and libqtlxqt alongside your app. It also does not require any special installation. Though, once you go down that path it is quite easy to register your app through xdg. Here is roughly how we deploy our AppImage: #!/bin/bash LD_LIBRARY_PATH= # additional library paths if required export LD_LIBRARY_PATH chmod u+x linuxdeploy*.AppImage # on CI/CD this might not have the executable flag when checked out export VERSION=1.0.0 echo == Remove old AppDir. == rm -rf AppDir echo == Generate new AppDir. == ./linuxdeploy-x86_64.AppImage --appdir=AppDir --executable=../release/MyApp --desktop-file=MyApp.desktop --icon-file=MyApp.svg echo == Bundle Qt libs and create AppImage. == cd AppDir ../linuxdeployqt-6-x86_64.AppImage MyApp.desktop -qmake=/path/to/qmake -appimage echo == Done. == You'll see that we use both linuxdeploy and linuxdeployqt. This is at least what worked for us. These tools require you not to use the newest version of Linux because they want to ensure broad portability. I guess that LGPL conformance is given because the AppImage is just a regular image that can be mounted regularly and thus someone might be able to exchange the libraries inside it. Just for completeness sake: Besides AppImage there is also Snap and Flatpack. My research at the time brought me to AppImages.

@Valentin-Gorelov Typically a handful messages per month, but this year even less. See the archives: https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-creator/ Regards