what are the reasons for these missing bindings? Is it because there is no need for binding, or is it that they cannot be implemented?

[markleo]

When reading the official documentation, I saw:
Qt for Python Missing Bindings
https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_for_Python_Missing_Bindings

So, what are the reasons for these missing bindings?
Is it because there is no need for binding, or is it that they cannot be implemented?

[SGaist]

That's a question for the Qt Company and/or the module maintainers. This is a user forum.
Note that writing bindings is a non trivial task depending on the underlying types and their lifetime management constraints.

[JonB]

@markleo

Number of types in QtDataVisualization: 35

Number of missing types: 0

I read this as telling that there are no missing/types bindings for QtDataVisualization, it should work as-is.

[markleo]

@JonB Hi, thanks your reply, I mean why Python binding do not cover all the C++ Qt modules?

[JonB]

@markleo
You ask a lot of generic questions! The answer is that certain interfaces simply have not been implemented, rather than there is no "need" for them or they "cannot" be implemented.

[markleo]

thanks for your answer, I also have a question, because Qt has been developing for many years, why are there still C++ modules that have not implemented bindding?

[SGaist]

That's a question for the Qt Company and/or the module maintainers. This is a user forum.
Note that writing bindings is a non trivial task depending on the underlying types and their lifetime management constraints.