I voted yes.
It has been said in the past in http://labs.qt.nokia.com/ that qt is going to be more modular.
This purpose makes qt more modular..
Also i want to mention some benefits for the unix that something like this might have.
Something like this (the proposal) can benefit distros which doesn't use binaries such as gentoo and slackware (they compile their binaries from the sources,a lot of time for Qt!)
Also note that only KDE users and Qt programmers need the entire Qt,all the others,they just need some modules of it(Qt frameworks),why these users should install/compile the entire Qt.
Don't take me wrong,but someone who needs just some Qt modules can blame the Qt frameworks that forces his to install in his system the entire Qt.
Moreover,Qt is going to be more "open" (Qt 5),so proposals like these will not make Qt frameworks more windows friendly,(at least not with the bad meaning of it).Actually the otherwise will happen,more modular Qt means more Qt in windows systems,so when people will start searching for more (bigger) Qtish stuff they will come across to projects like KDE,meego which are of course unix friendly.:)