Code::Blocks user trying QT
-
wrote on 5 Dec 2024, 10:28 last edited by
QT seem okay intuitive for me. Made a setup choosing cmake, because I think it's using GCC, but I want to use GCC and C99. I can start a new project, compile, run and see the result. If I later starts QT and load the test file, QT complains about the file is not a part of any project...
I use Linux Mint and here is the System Information:
Qt 6.7.3 (x86_64-little_endian-lp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 13.2.0) on "xcb"
OS: KDE Flatpak runtime [linux version 5.15.0-126-generic]What I'm doing wrong here?
-
QT seem okay intuitive for me. Made a setup choosing cmake, because I think it's using GCC, but I want to use GCC and C99. I can start a new project, compile, run and see the result. If I later starts QT and load the test file, QT complains about the file is not a part of any project...
I use Linux Mint and here is the System Information:
Qt 6.7.3 (x86_64-little_endian-lp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 13.2.0) on "xcb"
OS: KDE Flatpak runtime [linux version 5.15.0-126-generic]What I'm doing wrong here?
@grimvian said in Code::Blocks user trying QT:
If I later starts QT and load the test file
What test file do you mean? You have to open the project, not just a source code file.
-
wrote on 5 Dec 2024, 11:10 last edited by
Thanks.
If I want to specify C99, pedantic and so on, where can I do that?
-
QT seem okay intuitive for me. Made a setup choosing cmake, because I think it's using GCC, but I want to use GCC and C99. I can start a new project, compile, run and see the result. If I later starts QT and load the test file, QT complains about the file is not a part of any project...
I use Linux Mint and here is the System Information:
Qt 6.7.3 (x86_64-little_endian-lp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 13.2.0) on "xcb"
OS: KDE Flatpak runtime [linux version 5.15.0-126-generic]What I'm doing wrong here?
wrote on 5 Dec 2024, 12:11 last edited by@grimvian said in Code::Blocks user trying QT:
but I want to use GCC and C99
Assuming you mean you intend to write C code, not C++ (else why worry about C99?). Be aware that you won't be able to use any Qt libraries in this case. You can use Qt Creator to write a C-only program if you wish, but not one using Qt features.
-
-
@grimvian said in Code::Blocks user trying QT:
but I want to use GCC and C99
Assuming you mean you intend to write C code, not C++ (else why worry about C99?). Be aware that you won't be able to use any Qt libraries in this case. You can use Qt Creator to write a C-only program if you wish, but not one using Qt features.
-
@JonB I'm just interested in using QT as an IDE together with C99 and raylib graphics.
Thanks. -
wrote on 5 Dec 2024, 13:37 last edited by
@JonB said in Code::Blocks user trying QT:
@grimvian That's fine, no problem, thought why Qt/Creator I'm not sure.
I need an IDE because I type and read as a broken arm. :) I had some go's with different IDE's and until now, I have not tried other that is so intuitive as QT yet. Sadly Code::Blocks seems to die slowly.
-
@JonB said in Code::Blocks user trying QT:
@grimvian That's fine, no problem, thought why Qt/Creator I'm not sure.
I need an IDE because I type and read as a broken arm. :) I had some go's with different IDE's and until now, I have not tried other that is so intuitive as QT yet. Sadly Code::Blocks seems to die slowly.
1/10