Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. Can't play video on windows xp
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Can't play video on windows xp

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved General and Desktop
30 Posts 4 Posters 5.8k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Bonnie

    @LinArcX
    Running through qt-creator works, didn't you say that?
    So we don't need the output for that, we need the output when mediaplayer cannot work, that means running the application from your deployed directory .
    But there're two different situations:

    1. Running the application without qt-creator on the same machine you have your qt-creator. Does that work?. Even not, I'm sure this will eventually work, as long as it can loaded the right plugins just as running from qt-creator.
    2. Running the application on your xp machine. This would be different with running on windows 7 since the default mediaplayer plugin of msvc builds on vista+ is WMF, but WMF may be not available on xp. So it would also be helpful to see what plugins does it load.
    LinArcXL Offline
    LinArcXL Offline
    LinArcX
    wrote on last edited by LinArcX
    #8

    @Bonnie

    So we don't need the output for that, we need the output when mediaplayer cannot work...

    My mistake. sorry.

    1. Running the application without qt-creator on the same machine you have your qt-creator. Does that work?

    Surprisingly yes, I didn't know why this time it worked!

    (Also i'v noticed that setting QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS=1 and then run my .exe file doesn't show any debug output info. i don't know why)

    1. Running the application on your xp machine...

    I opened cmd.exe in deployed directory and:

    SET PATH=QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS=1;%PATH%

    And run my application:

    MyQtWidgetsTest.exe > output.txt 2>&1

    But it didn't generate output.txt file.

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • LinArcXL LinArcX

      @Bonnie

      So we don't need the output for that, we need the output when mediaplayer cannot work...

      My mistake. sorry.

      1. Running the application without qt-creator on the same machine you have your qt-creator. Does that work?

      Surprisingly yes, I didn't know why this time it worked!

      (Also i'v noticed that setting QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS=1 and then run my .exe file doesn't show any debug output info. i don't know why)

      1. Running the application on your xp machine...

      I opened cmd.exe in deployed directory and:

      SET PATH=QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS=1;%PATH%

      And run my application:

      MyQtWidgetsTest.exe > output.txt 2>&1

      But it didn't generate output.txt file.

      B Offline
      B Offline
      Bonnie
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      @LinArcX
      It uses OutputDebugString on windows instead of stdout/stderr, so the output can't be redirected.
      One solution is to use DebugView.
      (BTW, your above command to set environment variable is not right.)
      Open DebugView, then in cmd.exe:

      SET QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS=1
      MyQtWidgetsTest.exe
      

      The output will be shown in DebugView.

      LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • B Bonnie

        @LinArcX
        It uses OutputDebugString on windows instead of stdout/stderr, so the output can't be redirected.
        One solution is to use DebugView.
        (BTW, your above command to set environment variable is not right.)
        Open DebugView, then in cmd.exe:

        SET QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS=1
        MyQtWidgetsTest.exe
        

        The output will be shown in DebugView.

        LinArcXL Offline
        LinArcXL Offline
        LinArcX
        wrote on last edited by LinArcX
        #10

        @Bonnie
        Here you are:
        https://gist.github.com/LinArcX/f124ffb178d4c1d84c84e7e39f37f3a3

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • LinArcXL LinArcX

          @Bonnie
          Here you are:
          https://gist.github.com/LinArcX/f124ffb178d4c1d84c84e7e39f37f3a3

          B Offline
          B Offline
          Bonnie
          wrote on last edited by Bonnie
          #11

          @LinArcX
          I think the key point is

          QLibraryPrivate::loadPlugin failed on "Z:/workspace/c++/qt/build-AtmQtWidgetsTest-Desktop_Qt_5_6_3_MSVC2013_32_bit-Release/release/mediaservice/dsengine.dll" : "Cannot load library Z:\\workspace\\c++\\qt\\build-AtmQtWidgetsTest-Desktop_Qt_5_6_3_MSVC2013_32_bit-Release\\release\\mediaservice\\dsengine.dll: The specified module could not be found.
          

          That usually means there're some dependency dlls missing so the plugin dll cannot be loaded.
          Try using DependencyWalker to open dsengine.dll to check the dependencies.
          Maybe xp needs to install directx? I'm not sure...

          LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • B Bonnie

            @LinArcX
            I think the key point is

            QLibraryPrivate::loadPlugin failed on "Z:/workspace/c++/qt/build-AtmQtWidgetsTest-Desktop_Qt_5_6_3_MSVC2013_32_bit-Release/release/mediaservice/dsengine.dll" : "Cannot load library Z:\\workspace\\c++\\qt\\build-AtmQtWidgetsTest-Desktop_Qt_5_6_3_MSVC2013_32_bit-Release\\release\\mediaservice\\dsengine.dll: The specified module could not be found.
            

            That usually means there're some dependency dlls missing so the plugin dll cannot be loaded.
            Try using DependencyWalker to open dsengine.dll to check the dependencies.
            Maybe xp needs to install directx? I'm not sure...

            LinArcXL Offline
            LinArcXL Offline
            LinArcX
            wrote on last edited by LinArcX
            #12

            @Bonnie

            Hmmm.. Interesing. This is the output of dependency walker on dsengine.dll:

            • c:\windows\system32\GDI32.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\MF.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\MFPLAT.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\D3D9.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\DXVA2.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\WINMM.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\EVR.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\OLE32.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\OLEAUT32.DLL
            • c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\QT5WIDGETS.DLL
            • c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\QT5GUI.DLL
            • c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\QT5CORE.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\USER32.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\MSVCP120.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\MSVCR120.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\KERNEL32.DLL

            So, yes. Seems it depends on D3D9.dll that is parts of DirectX. But I installed DirectX 9 on windows xp and checked that d3d9.dll exists in c:\windows\system32.

            Edit: I've noticed that except mf.dll and mfplat.dll other dlls exists in c:\windows\system32.

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • LinArcXL LinArcX

              @Bonnie

              Hmmm.. Interesing. This is the output of dependency walker on dsengine.dll:

              • c:\windows\system32\GDI32.DLL
              • c:\windows\system32\MF.DLL
              • c:\windows\system32\MFPLAT.DLL
              • c:\windows\system32\D3D9.DLL
              • c:\windows\system32\DXVA2.DLL
              • c:\windows\system32\WINMM.DLL
              • c:\windows\system32\EVR.DLL
              • c:\windows\system32\OLE32.DLL
              • c:\windows\system32\OLEAUT32.DLL
              • c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\QT5WIDGETS.DLL
              • c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\QT5GUI.DLL
              • c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\QT5CORE.DLL
              • c:\windows\system32\USER32.DLL
              • c:\windows\system32\MSVCP120.DLL
              • c:\windows\system32\MSVCR120.DLL
              • c:\windows\system32\KERNEL32.DLL

              So, yes. Seems it depends on D3D9.dll that is parts of DirectX. But I installed DirectX 9 on windows xp and checked that d3d9.dll exists in c:\windows\system32.

              Edit: I've noticed that except mf.dll and mfplat.dll other dlls exists in c:\windows\system32.

              B Offline
              B Offline
              Bonnie
              wrote on last edited by Bonnie
              #13

              @LinArcX
              Well, this is not how we usually use dependency walker.
              In the middle list area, check the yellow icons for missing dlls and red icons for dlls that missing functions.
              Some can be ignored referring to https://www.dependencywalker.com/faq.html

              Edit: If it depends on mf.dll and mfplat.dll, that can be the problem. Maybe your compiling links newer DX libs that not supporting xp.
              Edit2: I've searched on google and others say that if mf.dll and mfplat.dll are lazy loaded, then that can also be ignored.

              LinArcXL 2 Replies Last reply
              2
              • B Bonnie

                @LinArcX
                Well, this is not how we usually use dependency walker.
                In the middle list area, check the yellow icons for missing dlls and red icons for dlls that missing functions.
                Some can be ignored referring to https://www.dependencywalker.com/faq.html

                Edit: If it depends on mf.dll and mfplat.dll, that can be the problem. Maybe your compiling links newer DX libs that not supporting xp.
                Edit2: I've searched on google and others say that if mf.dll and mfplat.dll are lazy loaded, then that can also be ignored.

                LinArcXL Offline
                LinArcXL Offline
                LinArcX
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                @Bonnie
                Lazy loaded? What that means?

                I download them from the internet and copy in system directory.

                But nothing changed.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B Bonnie

                  @LinArcX
                  Well, this is not how we usually use dependency walker.
                  In the middle list area, check the yellow icons for missing dlls and red icons for dlls that missing functions.
                  Some can be ignored referring to https://www.dependencywalker.com/faq.html

                  Edit: If it depends on mf.dll and mfplat.dll, that can be the problem. Maybe your compiling links newer DX libs that not supporting xp.
                  Edit2: I've searched on google and others say that if mf.dll and mfplat.dll are lazy loaded, then that can also be ignored.

                  LinArcXL Offline
                  LinArcXL Offline
                  LinArcX
                  wrote on last edited by LinArcX
                  #15

                  @Bonnie said in Can't play video on windows xp:

                  In the middle list area, check the yellow icons for missing dlls and red icons for dlls that missing functions.

                  depwalker.png

                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • LinArcXL LinArcX

                    @Bonnie said in Can't play video on windows xp:

                    In the middle list area, check the yellow icons for missing dlls and red icons for dlls that missing functions.

                    depwalker.png

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Bonnie
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    @LinArcX
                    Lazy loaded dlls would have a hourglass mark with the icon, like MPR.DLL / IESHIMS.DLL in your picture.
                    Your MF.DLL and MFPLAT.DLL seems to be direct linked, also your D3D9.dll is red so it may miss functions.
                    I would guess it is due to the DX lib when you compile Qt, as I said.
                    I don't have any 5.6.3 dlls on my machine but I have a deployed application of 5.5.1. Checking by dependency walker, the official prebuilt msvc2013 dsengine.dll of 5.5.1 doesn't depend on mf.dll and mfplat.dll directly.

                    LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B Bonnie

                      @LinArcX
                      Lazy loaded dlls would have a hourglass mark with the icon, like MPR.DLL / IESHIMS.DLL in your picture.
                      Your MF.DLL and MFPLAT.DLL seems to be direct linked, also your D3D9.dll is red so it may miss functions.
                      I would guess it is due to the DX lib when you compile Qt, as I said.
                      I don't have any 5.6.3 dlls on my machine but I have a deployed application of 5.5.1. Checking by dependency walker, the official prebuilt msvc2013 dsengine.dll of 5.5.1 doesn't depend on mf.dll and mfplat.dll directly.

                      LinArcXL Offline
                      LinArcXL Offline
                      LinArcX
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      @Bonnie

                      Maybe your compiling links newer DX libs that not supporting xp. I would guess it is due to the DX lib when you compile Qt, as I said.

                      You mean i should install Directx9 on my windows7, remove all other DirectX versions and compile qt5.6.3 again?

                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • LinArcXL LinArcX

                        @Bonnie

                        Maybe your compiling links newer DX libs that not supporting xp. I would guess it is due to the DX lib when you compile Qt, as I said.

                        You mean i should install Directx9 on my windows7, remove all other DirectX versions and compile qt5.6.3 again?

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        Bonnie
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        @LinArcX
                        You may be able to compile only the dsengine plugin.
                        But I don't know how to make sure you link the xp supported DX lib, since I don't target xp for at least 5 years...

                        LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Bonnie

                          @LinArcX
                          You may be able to compile only the dsengine plugin.
                          But I don't know how to make sure you link the xp supported DX lib, since I don't target xp for at least 5 years...

                          LinArcXL Offline
                          LinArcXL Offline
                          LinArcX
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          @Bonnie
                          What aboot this:

                          https://forum.qt.io/topic/59838/building-qt-from-source-on-windows/7

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • hskoglundH Online
                            hskoglundH Online
                            hskoglund
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            Hi, one other thing I saw in the dependency walker's output, it wants the Qt files from another Qt directory on your XP machine:
                            c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin

                            Make sure that this other version exists and is also Qt 5.6.3 Release for MSVC 2013.

                            LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • hskoglundH hskoglund

                              Hi, one other thing I saw in the dependency walker's output, it wants the Qt files from another Qt directory on your XP machine:
                              c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin

                              Make sure that this other version exists and is also Qt 5.6.3 Release for MSVC 2013.

                              LinArcXL Offline
                              LinArcXL Offline
                              LinArcX
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              @hskoglund
                              Hello. I have some questions:

                              1. Why application loads these .dlls from that weird directory instead of current directory of my application? (I used windeployqt)
                              2. Lets say, i fixed it. Do it fix main issue?(Showing video)
                              mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • LinArcXL LinArcX

                                @hskoglund
                                Hello. I have some questions:

                                1. Why application loads these .dlls from that weird directory instead of current directory of my application? (I used windeployqt)
                                2. Lets say, i fixed it. Do it fix main issue?(Showing video)
                                mrjjM Offline
                                mrjjM Offline
                                mrjj
                                Lifetime Qt Champion
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                @LinArcX
                                Hi
                                1: Ask Windows :) It is its run time loader that controls this.
                                2: It could fix it. However, the normal effect of mixing Qt version is crashes so
                                dont get to much hope up.

                                LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • mrjjM mrjj

                                  @LinArcX
                                  Hi
                                  1: Ask Windows :) It is its run time loader that controls this.
                                  2: It could fix it. However, the normal effect of mixing Qt version is crashes so
                                  dont get to much hope up.

                                  LinArcXL Offline
                                  LinArcXL Offline
                                  LinArcX
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @mrjj I mean why it didn't look in current directory first, if it looked why doesn't load it? Since those dlls exists beside main exe file.

                                  I noticed that on windows xp that doesn't have this directory(c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\), DependencyWalker complains that it can't find dlls:
                                  depXP.PNG
                                  `

                                  mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • LinArcXL LinArcX

                                    @mrjj I mean why it didn't look in current directory first, if it looked why doesn't load it? Since those dlls exists beside main exe file.

                                    I noticed that on windows xp that doesn't have this directory(c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\), DependencyWalker complains that it can't find dlls:
                                    depXP.PNG
                                    `

                                    mrjjM Offline
                                    mrjjM Offline
                                    mrjj
                                    Lifetime Qt Champion
                                    wrote on last edited by mrjj
                                    #24

                                    @LinArcX
                                    Well back in the Xp days they didn't load better i guess.
                                    In the newer version of windows, you can add a manifest file to tweaking it and at some point they also allowed
                                    side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.
                                    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/dlls/dynamic-link-library-search-order

                                    well (c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin) seems just to be
                                    https://github.com/neovim/neovim
                                    but it does uses Qt for GUI .

                                    Hmm so the DSENGINE cannot find its support DLLS ?
                                    those missing files are in your app folder ?

                                    Is there a reason you cant use a virtual machine with Xp (or real pc ) to install Qt5.6
                                    and what ever compiler you wish and simply compile and xp version for xp.
                                    And compile a win 7+ on win 7 ?
                                    Im not 100% sure you can have a one .exe that works on both as the backend changed alot.

                                    LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mrjjM mrjj

                                      @LinArcX
                                      Well back in the Xp days they didn't load better i guess.
                                      In the newer version of windows, you can add a manifest file to tweaking it and at some point they also allowed
                                      side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.
                                      https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/dlls/dynamic-link-library-search-order

                                      well (c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin) seems just to be
                                      https://github.com/neovim/neovim
                                      but it does uses Qt for GUI .

                                      Hmm so the DSENGINE cannot find its support DLLS ?
                                      those missing files are in your app folder ?

                                      Is there a reason you cant use a virtual machine with Xp (or real pc ) to install Qt5.6
                                      and what ever compiler you wish and simply compile and xp version for xp.
                                      And compile a win 7+ on win 7 ?
                                      Im not 100% sure you can have a one .exe that works on both as the backend changed alot.

                                      LinArcXL Offline
                                      LinArcXL Offline
                                      LinArcX
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @mrjj

                                      you can add a manifest file to tweaking it and at some point they also allowed side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.

                                      It works on xp?

                                      side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.> those missing files are in your app folder ?

                                      Exactly.

                                      Is there a reason you cant use a virtual machine with Xp (or real pc ) to install Qt5.6 and what ever compiler you wish and simply compile and xp version for xp.

                                      I tried to compile qt 5.5.0 on windos xp.(It's a virtualbox machine). It complains about some functions that only exists on x64 architecture.

                                      Im not 100% sure you can have a one .exe that works on both as the backend changed alot.

                                      So, you mean i should compile whole application in each os separately?

                                      mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • LinArcXL LinArcX

                                        @mrjj

                                        you can add a manifest file to tweaking it and at some point they also allowed side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.

                                        It works on xp?

                                        side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.> those missing files are in your app folder ?

                                        Exactly.

                                        Is there a reason you cant use a virtual machine with Xp (or real pc ) to install Qt5.6 and what ever compiler you wish and simply compile and xp version for xp.

                                        I tried to compile qt 5.5.0 on windos xp.(It's a virtualbox machine). It complains about some functions that only exists on x64 architecture.

                                        Im not 100% sure you can have a one .exe that works on both as the backend changed alot.

                                        So, you mean i should compile whole application in each os separately?

                                        mrjjM Offline
                                        mrjjM Offline
                                        mrjj
                                        Lifetime Qt Champion
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @LinArcX said in Can't play video on windows xp:

                                        @mrjj

                                        you can add a manifest file to tweaking it and at some point they also allowed side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.

                                        • It works on xp?
                                          I think so but not sure if it can help you load the right dlls.
                                          https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/sbscs/manifests

                                        • I tried to compile qt 5.5.0 on windos xp.(It's a virtualbox machine). It complains about some functions that only exists on x64 architecture.
                                          But Qt5.6 still supports Xp so why compile your self? You add something ?

                                        • So, you mean i should compile whole application in each os separately?
                                          Well that is how a few people I know still do - to have xp version. Its only SP3 Xp's that works but I guess
                                          all remaining xp's are patched.
                                          It might be less work than to make sure it links to older directX in newer windows. (if thats even possible)

                                        LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mrjjM mrjj

                                          @LinArcX said in Can't play video on windows xp:

                                          @mrjj

                                          you can add a manifest file to tweaking it and at some point they also allowed side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.

                                          • It works on xp?
                                            I think so but not sure if it can help you load the right dlls.
                                            https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/sbscs/manifests

                                          • I tried to compile qt 5.5.0 on windos xp.(It's a virtualbox machine). It complains about some functions that only exists on x64 architecture.
                                            But Qt5.6 still supports Xp so why compile your self? You add something ?

                                          • So, you mean i should compile whole application in each os separately?
                                            Well that is how a few people I know still do - to have xp version. Its only SP3 Xp's that works but I guess
                                            all remaining xp's are patched.
                                            It might be less work than to make sure it links to older directX in newer windows. (if thats even possible)

                                          LinArcXL Offline
                                          LinArcXL Offline
                                          LinArcX
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @mrjj said in Can't play video on windows xp:

                                          But Qt5.6 still supports Xp so why compile your self? You add something ?

                                          Which version of 5.6? 5.6.3?

                                          mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups
                                          • Search
                                          • Get Qt Extensions
                                          • Unsolved