Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. Can't play video on windows xp
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Can't play video on windows xp

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved General and Desktop
30 Posts 4 Posters 5.8k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LinArcXL LinArcX

    @Bonnie

    So we don't need the output for that, we need the output when mediaplayer cannot work...

    My mistake. sorry.

    1. Running the application without qt-creator on the same machine you have your qt-creator. Does that work?

    Surprisingly yes, I didn't know why this time it worked!

    (Also i'v noticed that setting QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS=1 and then run my .exe file doesn't show any debug output info. i don't know why)

    1. Running the application on your xp machine...

    I opened cmd.exe in deployed directory and:

    SET PATH=QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS=1;%PATH%

    And run my application:

    MyQtWidgetsTest.exe > output.txt 2>&1

    But it didn't generate output.txt file.

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Bonnie
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @LinArcX
    It uses OutputDebugString on windows instead of stdout/stderr, so the output can't be redirected.
    One solution is to use DebugView.
    (BTW, your above command to set environment variable is not right.)
    Open DebugView, then in cmd.exe:

    SET QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS=1
    MyQtWidgetsTest.exe
    

    The output will be shown in DebugView.

    LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • B Bonnie

      @LinArcX
      It uses OutputDebugString on windows instead of stdout/stderr, so the output can't be redirected.
      One solution is to use DebugView.
      (BTW, your above command to set environment variable is not right.)
      Open DebugView, then in cmd.exe:

      SET QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS=1
      MyQtWidgetsTest.exe
      

      The output will be shown in DebugView.

      LinArcXL Offline
      LinArcXL Offline
      LinArcX
      wrote on last edited by LinArcX
      #10

      @Bonnie
      Here you are:
      https://gist.github.com/LinArcX/f124ffb178d4c1d84c84e7e39f37f3a3

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • LinArcXL LinArcX

        @Bonnie
        Here you are:
        https://gist.github.com/LinArcX/f124ffb178d4c1d84c84e7e39f37f3a3

        B Offline
        B Offline
        Bonnie
        wrote on last edited by Bonnie
        #11

        @LinArcX
        I think the key point is

        QLibraryPrivate::loadPlugin failed on "Z:/workspace/c++/qt/build-AtmQtWidgetsTest-Desktop_Qt_5_6_3_MSVC2013_32_bit-Release/release/mediaservice/dsengine.dll" : "Cannot load library Z:\\workspace\\c++\\qt\\build-AtmQtWidgetsTest-Desktop_Qt_5_6_3_MSVC2013_32_bit-Release\\release\\mediaservice\\dsengine.dll: The specified module could not be found.
        

        That usually means there're some dependency dlls missing so the plugin dll cannot be loaded.
        Try using DependencyWalker to open dsengine.dll to check the dependencies.
        Maybe xp needs to install directx? I'm not sure...

        LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • B Bonnie

          @LinArcX
          I think the key point is

          QLibraryPrivate::loadPlugin failed on "Z:/workspace/c++/qt/build-AtmQtWidgetsTest-Desktop_Qt_5_6_3_MSVC2013_32_bit-Release/release/mediaservice/dsengine.dll" : "Cannot load library Z:\\workspace\\c++\\qt\\build-AtmQtWidgetsTest-Desktop_Qt_5_6_3_MSVC2013_32_bit-Release\\release\\mediaservice\\dsengine.dll: The specified module could not be found.
          

          That usually means there're some dependency dlls missing so the plugin dll cannot be loaded.
          Try using DependencyWalker to open dsengine.dll to check the dependencies.
          Maybe xp needs to install directx? I'm not sure...

          LinArcXL Offline
          LinArcXL Offline
          LinArcX
          wrote on last edited by LinArcX
          #12

          @Bonnie

          Hmmm.. Interesing. This is the output of dependency walker on dsengine.dll:

          • c:\windows\system32\GDI32.DLL
          • c:\windows\system32\MF.DLL
          • c:\windows\system32\MFPLAT.DLL
          • c:\windows\system32\D3D9.DLL
          • c:\windows\system32\DXVA2.DLL
          • c:\windows\system32\WINMM.DLL
          • c:\windows\system32\EVR.DLL
          • c:\windows\system32\OLE32.DLL
          • c:\windows\system32\OLEAUT32.DLL
          • c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\QT5WIDGETS.DLL
          • c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\QT5GUI.DLL
          • c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\QT5CORE.DLL
          • c:\windows\system32\USER32.DLL
          • c:\windows\system32\MSVCP120.DLL
          • c:\windows\system32\MSVCR120.DLL
          • c:\windows\system32\KERNEL32.DLL

          So, yes. Seems it depends on D3D9.dll that is parts of DirectX. But I installed DirectX 9 on windows xp and checked that d3d9.dll exists in c:\windows\system32.

          Edit: I've noticed that except mf.dll and mfplat.dll other dlls exists in c:\windows\system32.

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • LinArcXL LinArcX

            @Bonnie

            Hmmm.. Interesing. This is the output of dependency walker on dsengine.dll:

            • c:\windows\system32\GDI32.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\MF.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\MFPLAT.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\D3D9.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\DXVA2.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\WINMM.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\EVR.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\OLE32.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\OLEAUT32.DLL
            • c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\QT5WIDGETS.DLL
            • c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\QT5GUI.DLL
            • c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\QT5CORE.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\USER32.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\MSVCP120.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\MSVCR120.DLL
            • c:\windows\system32\KERNEL32.DLL

            So, yes. Seems it depends on D3D9.dll that is parts of DirectX. But I installed DirectX 9 on windows xp and checked that d3d9.dll exists in c:\windows\system32.

            Edit: I've noticed that except mf.dll and mfplat.dll other dlls exists in c:\windows\system32.

            B Offline
            B Offline
            Bonnie
            wrote on last edited by Bonnie
            #13

            @LinArcX
            Well, this is not how we usually use dependency walker.
            In the middle list area, check the yellow icons for missing dlls and red icons for dlls that missing functions.
            Some can be ignored referring to https://www.dependencywalker.com/faq.html

            Edit: If it depends on mf.dll and mfplat.dll, that can be the problem. Maybe your compiling links newer DX libs that not supporting xp.
            Edit2: I've searched on google and others say that if mf.dll and mfplat.dll are lazy loaded, then that can also be ignored.

            LinArcXL 2 Replies Last reply
            2
            • B Bonnie

              @LinArcX
              Well, this is not how we usually use dependency walker.
              In the middle list area, check the yellow icons for missing dlls and red icons for dlls that missing functions.
              Some can be ignored referring to https://www.dependencywalker.com/faq.html

              Edit: If it depends on mf.dll and mfplat.dll, that can be the problem. Maybe your compiling links newer DX libs that not supporting xp.
              Edit2: I've searched on google and others say that if mf.dll and mfplat.dll are lazy loaded, then that can also be ignored.

              LinArcXL Offline
              LinArcXL Offline
              LinArcX
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              @Bonnie
              Lazy loaded? What that means?

              I download them from the internet and copy in system directory.

              But nothing changed.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B Bonnie

                @LinArcX
                Well, this is not how we usually use dependency walker.
                In the middle list area, check the yellow icons for missing dlls and red icons for dlls that missing functions.
                Some can be ignored referring to https://www.dependencywalker.com/faq.html

                Edit: If it depends on mf.dll and mfplat.dll, that can be the problem. Maybe your compiling links newer DX libs that not supporting xp.
                Edit2: I've searched on google and others say that if mf.dll and mfplat.dll are lazy loaded, then that can also be ignored.

                LinArcXL Offline
                LinArcXL Offline
                LinArcX
                wrote on last edited by LinArcX
                #15

                @Bonnie said in Can't play video on windows xp:

                In the middle list area, check the yellow icons for missing dlls and red icons for dlls that missing functions.

                depwalker.png

                B 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • LinArcXL LinArcX

                  @Bonnie said in Can't play video on windows xp:

                  In the middle list area, check the yellow icons for missing dlls and red icons for dlls that missing functions.

                  depwalker.png

                  B Offline
                  B Offline
                  Bonnie
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  @LinArcX
                  Lazy loaded dlls would have a hourglass mark with the icon, like MPR.DLL / IESHIMS.DLL in your picture.
                  Your MF.DLL and MFPLAT.DLL seems to be direct linked, also your D3D9.dll is red so it may miss functions.
                  I would guess it is due to the DX lib when you compile Qt, as I said.
                  I don't have any 5.6.3 dlls on my machine but I have a deployed application of 5.5.1. Checking by dependency walker, the official prebuilt msvc2013 dsengine.dll of 5.5.1 doesn't depend on mf.dll and mfplat.dll directly.

                  LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Bonnie

                    @LinArcX
                    Lazy loaded dlls would have a hourglass mark with the icon, like MPR.DLL / IESHIMS.DLL in your picture.
                    Your MF.DLL and MFPLAT.DLL seems to be direct linked, also your D3D9.dll is red so it may miss functions.
                    I would guess it is due to the DX lib when you compile Qt, as I said.
                    I don't have any 5.6.3 dlls on my machine but I have a deployed application of 5.5.1. Checking by dependency walker, the official prebuilt msvc2013 dsengine.dll of 5.5.1 doesn't depend on mf.dll and mfplat.dll directly.

                    LinArcXL Offline
                    LinArcXL Offline
                    LinArcX
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    @Bonnie

                    Maybe your compiling links newer DX libs that not supporting xp. I would guess it is due to the DX lib when you compile Qt, as I said.

                    You mean i should install Directx9 on my windows7, remove all other DirectX versions and compile qt5.6.3 again?

                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • LinArcXL LinArcX

                      @Bonnie

                      Maybe your compiling links newer DX libs that not supporting xp. I would guess it is due to the DX lib when you compile Qt, as I said.

                      You mean i should install Directx9 on my windows7, remove all other DirectX versions and compile qt5.6.3 again?

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      Bonnie
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      @LinArcX
                      You may be able to compile only the dsengine plugin.
                      But I don't know how to make sure you link the xp supported DX lib, since I don't target xp for at least 5 years...

                      LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B Bonnie

                        @LinArcX
                        You may be able to compile only the dsengine plugin.
                        But I don't know how to make sure you link the xp supported DX lib, since I don't target xp for at least 5 years...

                        LinArcXL Offline
                        LinArcXL Offline
                        LinArcX
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        @Bonnie
                        What aboot this:

                        https://forum.qt.io/topic/59838/building-qt-from-source-on-windows/7

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • hskoglundH Offline
                          hskoglundH Offline
                          hskoglund
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          Hi, one other thing I saw in the dependency walker's output, it wants the Qt files from another Qt directory on your XP machine:
                          c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin

                          Make sure that this other version exists and is also Qt 5.6.3 Release for MSVC 2013.

                          LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • hskoglundH hskoglund

                            Hi, one other thing I saw in the dependency walker's output, it wants the Qt files from another Qt directory on your XP machine:
                            c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin

                            Make sure that this other version exists and is also Qt 5.6.3 Release for MSVC 2013.

                            LinArcXL Offline
                            LinArcXL Offline
                            LinArcX
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            @hskoglund
                            Hello. I have some questions:

                            1. Why application loads these .dlls from that weird directory instead of current directory of my application? (I used windeployqt)
                            2. Lets say, i fixed it. Do it fix main issue?(Showing video)
                            mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • LinArcXL LinArcX

                              @hskoglund
                              Hello. I have some questions:

                              1. Why application loads these .dlls from that weird directory instead of current directory of my application? (I used windeployqt)
                              2. Lets say, i fixed it. Do it fix main issue?(Showing video)
                              mrjjM Offline
                              mrjjM Offline
                              mrjj
                              Lifetime Qt Champion
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              @LinArcX
                              Hi
                              1: Ask Windows :) It is its run time loader that controls this.
                              2: It could fix it. However, the normal effect of mixing Qt version is crashes so
                              dont get to much hope up.

                              LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • mrjjM mrjj

                                @LinArcX
                                Hi
                                1: Ask Windows :) It is its run time loader that controls this.
                                2: It could fix it. However, the normal effect of mixing Qt version is crashes so
                                dont get to much hope up.

                                LinArcXL Offline
                                LinArcXL Offline
                                LinArcX
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #23

                                @mrjj I mean why it didn't look in current directory first, if it looked why doesn't load it? Since those dlls exists beside main exe file.

                                I noticed that on windows xp that doesn't have this directory(c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\), DependencyWalker complains that it can't find dlls:
                                depXP.PNG
                                `

                                mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • LinArcXL LinArcX

                                  @mrjj I mean why it didn't look in current directory first, if it looked why doesn't load it? Since those dlls exists beside main exe file.

                                  I noticed that on windows xp that doesn't have this directory(c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin\), DependencyWalker complains that it can't find dlls:
                                  depXP.PNG
                                  `

                                  mrjjM Offline
                                  mrjjM Offline
                                  mrjj
                                  Lifetime Qt Champion
                                  wrote on last edited by mrjj
                                  #24

                                  @LinArcX
                                  Well back in the Xp days they didn't load better i guess.
                                  In the newer version of windows, you can add a manifest file to tweaking it and at some point they also allowed
                                  side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.
                                  https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/dlls/dynamic-link-library-search-order

                                  well (c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin) seems just to be
                                  https://github.com/neovim/neovim
                                  but it does uses Qt for GUI .

                                  Hmm so the DSENGINE cannot find its support DLLS ?
                                  those missing files are in your app folder ?

                                  Is there a reason you cant use a virtual machine with Xp (or real pc ) to install Qt5.6
                                  and what ever compiler you wish and simply compile and xp version for xp.
                                  And compile a win 7+ on win 7 ?
                                  Im not 100% sure you can have a one .exe that works on both as the backend changed alot.

                                  LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mrjjM mrjj

                                    @LinArcX
                                    Well back in the Xp days they didn't load better i guess.
                                    In the newer version of windows, you can add a manifest file to tweaking it and at some point they also allowed
                                    side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.
                                    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/dlls/dynamic-link-library-search-order

                                    well (c:\tools\neovim\neovim\bin) seems just to be
                                    https://github.com/neovim/neovim
                                    but it does uses Qt for GUI .

                                    Hmm so the DSENGINE cannot find its support DLLS ?
                                    those missing files are in your app folder ?

                                    Is there a reason you cant use a virtual machine with Xp (or real pc ) to install Qt5.6
                                    and what ever compiler you wish and simply compile and xp version for xp.
                                    And compile a win 7+ on win 7 ?
                                    Im not 100% sure you can have a one .exe that works on both as the backend changed alot.

                                    LinArcXL Offline
                                    LinArcXL Offline
                                    LinArcX
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #25

                                    @mrjj

                                    you can add a manifest file to tweaking it and at some point they also allowed side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.

                                    It works on xp?

                                    side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.> those missing files are in your app folder ?

                                    Exactly.

                                    Is there a reason you cant use a virtual machine with Xp (or real pc ) to install Qt5.6 and what ever compiler you wish and simply compile and xp version for xp.

                                    I tried to compile qt 5.5.0 on windos xp.(It's a virtualbox machine). It complains about some functions that only exists on x64 architecture.

                                    Im not 100% sure you can have a one .exe that works on both as the backend changed alot.

                                    So, you mean i should compile whole application in each os separately?

                                    mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • LinArcXL LinArcX

                                      @mrjj

                                      you can add a manifest file to tweaking it and at some point they also allowed side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.

                                      It works on xp?

                                      side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.> those missing files are in your app folder ?

                                      Exactly.

                                      Is there a reason you cant use a virtual machine with Xp (or real pc ) to install Qt5.6 and what ever compiler you wish and simply compile and xp version for xp.

                                      I tried to compile qt 5.5.0 on windos xp.(It's a virtualbox machine). It complains about some functions that only exists on x64 architecture.

                                      Im not 100% sure you can have a one .exe that works on both as the backend changed alot.

                                      So, you mean i should compile whole application in each os separately?

                                      mrjjM Offline
                                      mrjjM Offline
                                      mrjj
                                      Lifetime Qt Champion
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #26

                                      @LinArcX said in Can't play video on windows xp:

                                      @mrjj

                                      you can add a manifest file to tweaking it and at some point they also allowed side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.

                                      • It works on xp?
                                        I think so but not sure if it can help you load the right dlls.
                                        https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/sbscs/manifests

                                      • I tried to compile qt 5.5.0 on windos xp.(It's a virtualbox machine). It complains about some functions that only exists on x64 architecture.
                                        But Qt5.6 still supports Xp so why compile your self? You add something ?

                                      • So, you mean i should compile whole application in each os separately?
                                        Well that is how a few people I know still do - to have xp version. Its only SP3 Xp's that works but I guess
                                        all remaining xp's are patched.
                                        It might be less work than to make sure it links to older directX in newer windows. (if thats even possible)

                                      LinArcXL 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mrjjM mrjj

                                        @LinArcX said in Can't play video on windows xp:

                                        @mrjj

                                        you can add a manifest file to tweaking it and at some point they also allowed side by side loading of Dlls with same name etc.

                                        • It works on xp?
                                          I think so but not sure if it can help you load the right dlls.
                                          https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/sbscs/manifests

                                        • I tried to compile qt 5.5.0 on windos xp.(It's a virtualbox machine). It complains about some functions that only exists on x64 architecture.
                                          But Qt5.6 still supports Xp so why compile your self? You add something ?

                                        • So, you mean i should compile whole application in each os separately?
                                          Well that is how a few people I know still do - to have xp version. Its only SP3 Xp's that works but I guess
                                          all remaining xp's are patched.
                                          It might be less work than to make sure it links to older directX in newer windows. (if thats even possible)

                                        LinArcXL Offline
                                        LinArcXL Offline
                                        LinArcX
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #27

                                        @mrjj said in Can't play video on windows xp:

                                        But Qt5.6 still supports Xp so why compile your self? You add something ?

                                        Which version of 5.6? 5.6.3?

                                        mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • LinArcXL LinArcX

                                          @mrjj said in Can't play video on windows xp:

                                          But Qt5.6 still supports Xp so why compile your self? You add something ?

                                          Which version of 5.6? 5.6.3?

                                          mrjjM Offline
                                          mrjjM Offline
                                          mrjj
                                          Lifetime Qt Champion
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #28

                                          @LinArcX
                                          Yes. I saw someone write he used that version in 32 bit and it worked for
                                          Xp. I didnt personally tried it, though.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups
                                          • Search
                                          • Get Qt Extensions
                                          • Unsolved