Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. QT Commercial vs Open Source
QtWS25 Last Chance

QT Commercial vs Open Source

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved General and Desktop
30 Posts 7 Posters 18.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Stevendragoes
    wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:15 last edited by
    #3

    @sierdzio
    I am developing on desktop platform. Hence, a Free Open Sourced License will do? What if I want to sell my invention/personal project? will QT charge? Because I believe that there exists a commercial license for a reason. Hence, I don't want to make any mistakes.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      sierdzio
      Moderators
      wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:17 last edited by aha_1980 2 Jun 2020, 17:32
      #4

      As long as you use LGPL Qt (no GPL modules like QtCharts) and meet LGPL requirements you do not need the commercial license. You can sell your app, no problem there. Even the GPL does not forbid selling of stuff.

      (Z(:^

      1 Reply Last reply
      5
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Stevendragoes
        wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:23 last edited by Stevendragoes 2 Jun 2020, 08:25
        #5

        Alright. So, It is possible for me to get a confirmation from the QT sales team that they will not come after me if I released a proprietary software that I developed on my own?

        What do I have to worry here? I heard that the Open Source license can be copied by anyone?

        How can i check my QT license? from the Update Manger?

        Please pardon me for being a total ignorant newbie here

        EDIT: I think I have to make my software with the source code public for 3 years. Am I right?
        5b30257c-c9c9-492a-a735-d0a0ecc0313b-image.png

        J S J 3 Replies Last reply 6 Feb 2020, 08:31
        0
        • S Stevendragoes
          6 Feb 2020, 08:23

          Alright. So, It is possible for me to get a confirmation from the QT sales team that they will not come after me if I released a proprietary software that I developed on my own?

          What do I have to worry here? I heard that the Open Source license can be copied by anyone?

          How can i check my QT license? from the Update Manger?

          Please pardon me for being a total ignorant newbie here

          EDIT: I think I have to make my software with the source code public for 3 years. Am I right?
          5b30257c-c9c9-492a-a735-d0a0ecc0313b-image.png

          J Online
          J Online
          JonB
          wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:31 last edited by
          #6

          @Stevendragoes said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

          Alright. So, It is possible for me to get a confirmation from the QT sales team that they will not come after me if I released a proprietary software that I developed on my own?

          You would have to contact The Qt Company if you really want to ask a question like that. This is a user forum.

          EDIT: I think I have to make my software with the source code public for 3 years. Am I right?

          Where does that come from?

          O 1 Reply Last reply 6 Feb 2020, 08:32
          1
          • J JonB
            6 Feb 2020, 08:31

            @Stevendragoes said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

            Alright. So, It is possible for me to get a confirmation from the QT sales team that they will not come after me if I released a proprietary software that I developed on my own?

            You would have to contact The Qt Company if you really want to ask a question like that. This is a user forum.

            EDIT: I think I have to make my software with the source code public for 3 years. Am I right?

            Where does that come from?

            O Offline
            O Offline
            ODБOï
            wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:32 last edited by
            #7

            @JonB said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

            Where does that come from?

            column 3 row 3

            J J 2 Replies Last reply 6 Feb 2020, 08:37
            1
            • S Stevendragoes
              6 Feb 2020, 08:23

              Alright. So, It is possible for me to get a confirmation from the QT sales team that they will not come after me if I released a proprietary software that I developed on my own?

              What do I have to worry here? I heard that the Open Source license can be copied by anyone?

              How can i check my QT license? from the Update Manger?

              Please pardon me for being a total ignorant newbie here

              EDIT: I think I have to make my software with the source code public for 3 years. Am I right?
              5b30257c-c9c9-492a-a735-d0a0ecc0313b-image.png

              S Offline
              S Offline
              sierdzio
              Moderators
              wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:36 last edited by
              #8

              @Stevendragoes said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

              Alright. So, It is possible for me to get a confirmation from the QT sales team that they will not come after me if I released a proprietary software that I developed on my own?

              Ask Qt Company then :-) I'm not their employee. But I can say that if you make sure you don't break LGPL, Qt Company won't have any basis to "chase" you.

              What do I have to worry here? I heard that the Open Source license can be copied by anyone?

              Yes, but LGPL applies only to Qt not to your code. That's why you have to inform your users that you are using Qt and that they can replace Qt with their own version if they want to.

              How can i check my QT license? from the Update Manger?

              If you have installed Qt without paying the commercial license, it is safe to assume you are using the open source version ;-)

              The choice between LGPL and GPL is arbitrary - you choose which license you want Qt to be under (unless you chose some module which is not available under LGPL, like QtCharts, Lottie etc.).

              Please pardon me for being a total ignorant newbie here

              No problem, that's what this forum is for :-)

              EDIT: I think I have to make my software with the source code public for 3 years. Am I right?

              No, this is only about Qt. Your code is not bound by LGPL license (unless you decide to ship your code under LGPL as well).

              So you have to provide Qt source code to your clients if they ask for it. In practice it means you should have a copy of Qt source code somewhere on your PC/ server for 3 years (just in case that official Qt archive goes offline or something). And if you patch Qt (for example, change something in QString code), these patches need to be under LGPL and you have to make them available to your clients.

              That's one more point - to your clients. LGPL does not apply to every human being in existence :-) You don't have to publish Qt and your patches online for everybody. LGPL requires you to do it only for your clients (people using your app).

              (Z(:^

              1 Reply Last reply
              5
              • O ODБOï
                6 Feb 2020, 08:32

                @JonB said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                Where does that come from?

                column 3 row 3

                J Offline
                J Offline
                jsulm
                Lifetime Qt Champion
                wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:37 last edited by
                #9

                @LeLev I think it is about Qt source code, not the code of an application. There is no requirement in LGPL2/3 to make your own source code public when linking against LGPL libs dynamically!

                https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • S Stevendragoes
                  6 Feb 2020, 08:23

                  Alright. So, It is possible for me to get a confirmation from the QT sales team that they will not come after me if I released a proprietary software that I developed on my own?

                  What do I have to worry here? I heard that the Open Source license can be copied by anyone?

                  How can i check my QT license? from the Update Manger?

                  Please pardon me for being a total ignorant newbie here

                  EDIT: I think I have to make my software with the source code public for 3 years. Am I right?
                  5b30257c-c9c9-492a-a735-d0a0ecc0313b-image.png

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  J.Hilk
                  Moderators
                  wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:39 last edited by
                  #10

                  @Stevendragoes said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                  Alright. So, It is possible for me to get a confirmation from the QT sales team that they will not come after me if I released a proprietary software that I developed on my own?

                  No, there is no guarantee
                  I had been developing with the normal Qt License for about 3 years, and then in a real d*move the Qt Company contacted me and said I had the wrong license and I would own them money.

                  IIRC they did not retroactively apply it(at least)


                  Be aware of the Qt Code of Conduct, when posting : https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct


                  Q: What's that?
                  A: It's blue light.
                  Q: What does it do?
                  A: It turns blue.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • O ODБOï
                    6 Feb 2020, 08:32

                    @JonB said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                    Where does that come from?

                    column 3 row 3

                    J Online
                    J Online
                    JonB
                    wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:40 last edited by JonB 2 Jun 2020, 08:40
                    #11

                    @LeLev said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                    @JonB said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                    Where does that come from?

                    column 3 row 3

                    From an unlinked/unreferenced pasted screenshot? That is not what I meant....

                    S 1 Reply Last reply 6 Feb 2020, 08:40
                    0
                    • J JonB
                      6 Feb 2020, 08:40

                      @LeLev said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                      @JonB said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                      Where does that come from?

                      column 3 row 3

                      From an unlinked/unreferenced pasted screenshot? That is not what I meant....

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      sierdzio
                      Moderators
                      wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:40 last edited by
                      #12

                      @JonB said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                      @LeLev said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                      @JonB said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                      Where does that come from?

                      column 3 row 3

                      From an unlinked/unreferenced pasted screenshot? That is not what I meant....

                      It's linked to in my post... https://tldrlegal.com/license/gnu-lesser-general-public-license-v3-(lgpl-3)

                      (Z(:^

                      J 1 Reply Last reply 6 Feb 2020, 08:42
                      1
                      • S sierdzio
                        6 Feb 2020, 08:40

                        @JonB said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                        @LeLev said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                        @JonB said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                        Where does that come from?

                        column 3 row 3

                        From an unlinked/unreferenced pasted screenshot? That is not what I meant....

                        It's linked to in my post... https://tldrlegal.com/license/gnu-lesser-general-public-license-v3-(lgpl-3)

                        J Online
                        J Online
                        JonB
                        wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:42 last edited by JonB 2 Jun 2020, 08:48
                        #13

                        @sierdzio
                        Yep, I now see that. I can only say that picture/table does not come out like that in my (Chrome Firefox) browser!

                        J O 2 Replies Last reply 6 Feb 2020, 08:42
                        0
                        • J JonB
                          6 Feb 2020, 08:42

                          @sierdzio
                          Yep, I now see that. I can only say that picture/table does not come out like that in my (Chrome Firefox) browser!

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          J.Hilk
                          Moderators
                          wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:42 last edited by
                          #14

                          @JonB probably simply "dark mode"


                          Be aware of the Qt Code of Conduct, when posting : https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct


                          Q: What's that?
                          A: It's blue light.
                          Q: What does it do?
                          A: It turns blue.

                          J 1 Reply Last reply 6 Feb 2020, 08:44
                          0
                          • J J.Hilk
                            6 Feb 2020, 08:42

                            @JonB probably simply "dark mode"

                            J Online
                            J Online
                            JonB
                            wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:44 last edited by
                            #15

                            @J-Hilk
                            Yep, plus the user must have manually expanded every item :) I didn't recognise it! Anyway I now see the 3 year reference, I was not aware of that, thanks.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • J JonB
                              6 Feb 2020, 08:42

                              @sierdzio
                              Yep, I now see that. I can only say that picture/table does not come out like that in my (Chrome Firefox) browser!

                              O Offline
                              O Offline
                              ODБOï
                              wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:44 last edited by
                              #16

                              @JonB +expand tabs

                              J 1 Reply Last reply 6 Feb 2020, 08:47
                              0
                              • O ODБOï
                                6 Feb 2020, 08:44

                                @JonB +expand tabs

                                J Online
                                J Online
                                JonB
                                wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:47 last edited by
                                #17

                                @LeLev said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                                @JonB +expand tabs

                                This is about as OT as it gets (sorry!), but what does that mean? :confused:

                                O 1 Reply Last reply 6 Feb 2020, 08:51
                                0
                                • J JonB
                                  6 Feb 2020, 08:47

                                  @LeLev said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                                  @JonB +expand tabs

                                  This is about as OT as it gets (sorry!), but what does that mean? :confused:

                                  O Offline
                                  O Offline
                                  ODБOï
                                  wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 08:51 last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @JonB H.Hilk said, "dark mode" and i added "+ expanded tabs"

                                  J 1 Reply Last reply 6 Feb 2020, 09:00
                                  0
                                  • O ODБOï
                                    6 Feb 2020, 08:51

                                    @JonB H.Hilk said, "dark mode" and i added "+ expanded tabs"

                                    J Online
                                    J Online
                                    JonB
                                    wrote on 6 Feb 2020, 09:00 last edited by JonB 2 Jun 2020, 09:01
                                    #19

                                    @LeLev
                                    Got it, sorry, I thought you were trying to tell me something to press in browser to auto-expand all those folded points! :)

                                    I will be quiet now, and allow OP's discussion to continue if needed. Sorry for interruption.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Stevendragoes
                                      wrote on 7 Feb 2020, 02:16 last edited by
                                      #20

                                      @All thanks for the clarifications. especially @sierdzio I will contact the QT company as well to see which license is right for me

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        SimonSchroeder
                                        wrote on 7 Feb 2020, 08:06 last edited by
                                        #21

                                        Qt will always tell you that it is safest to get the commercial license. There are a few things in the LGPL (especially in back in version 2 previously used by Qt) that have never been fought in court (for any software or library). This is where some uncertainty comes from. And also Qt wants to make money, so they will always tell you to buy the commercial license.

                                        However, I am still unsure where the 3 years come from. This is not stated anywhere in the LGPL v3. The obligations that the LGPL states are:

                                        • that you keep a copy of the source code (Qt in this case) that you can provide your clients with (you have to have a copy; it is not sufficient that there is an official download page)
                                        • that you provide your client with everything he needs to relink your software

                                        The second point is easily achieved by dynamically linking to Qt (i.e. DLLs). In theory (though this has never been legally tested), you can also statically link with Qt as long as you provide (upon request) the object files of your own software (and in special cases the linker as well) so that your client could relink your object files with a different Qt version. If you comply with this the Qt company can't force you into buying the commercial license.

                                        I would assume that you need to provide the source code of Qt for the versions of the software you are still distributing. Though I am not a lawyer and so I don't know for sure. Keeping the source of Qt for another 3 years certainly helps legally, but as I said I can't find it in the official license itself.

                                        J 1 Reply Last reply 7 Feb 2020, 08:29
                                        2
                                        • S SimonSchroeder
                                          7 Feb 2020, 08:06

                                          Qt will always tell you that it is safest to get the commercial license. There are a few things in the LGPL (especially in back in version 2 previously used by Qt) that have never been fought in court (for any software or library). This is where some uncertainty comes from. And also Qt wants to make money, so they will always tell you to buy the commercial license.

                                          However, I am still unsure where the 3 years come from. This is not stated anywhere in the LGPL v3. The obligations that the LGPL states are:

                                          • that you keep a copy of the source code (Qt in this case) that you can provide your clients with (you have to have a copy; it is not sufficient that there is an official download page)
                                          • that you provide your client with everything he needs to relink your software

                                          The second point is easily achieved by dynamically linking to Qt (i.e. DLLs). In theory (though this has never been legally tested), you can also statically link with Qt as long as you provide (upon request) the object files of your own software (and in special cases the linker as well) so that your client could relink your object files with a different Qt version. If you comply with this the Qt company can't force you into buying the commercial license.

                                          I would assume that you need to provide the source code of Qt for the versions of the software you are still distributing. Though I am not a lawyer and so I don't know for sure. Keeping the source of Qt for another 3 years certainly helps legally, but as I said I can't find it in the official license itself.

                                          J Online
                                          J Online
                                          JonB
                                          wrote on 7 Feb 2020, 08:29 last edited by JonB 2 Jul 2020, 08:38
                                          #22

                                          @SimonSchroeder said in QT Commercial vs Open Source:

                                          Qt will always tell you that it is safest to get the commercial license.

                                          I would agree with this. Not that I wish to knock them, they are here to make money.

                                          However, I am still unsure where the 3 years come from. This is not stated anywhere in the LGPL v3.

                                          You will see I asked this earlier above, because I did not know about it. However, the link given --- https://tldrlegal.com/license/gnu-lesser-general-public-license-v3-(lgpl-3), go to the rightmost Must column, click on the 3rd item down, Disclose Source, it expands to show

                                          If you distribute this library in an executable, you must make the source available for 3 years.

                                          I took this to be some official LGPL document when I was referred to it by others above. I now realise it is just some guy's TL;DR. Hence why I questioned where the OP got his screenshot from. However, I also encounter in https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/understanding-open-source/0596005814/ch03.html

                                          This is the most favored way to make source code available. It requires no additional effort from the distributee and is not time-limited. This is the best way to comply with Section 3 for all but the largest programs.

                                          b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,
                                          

                                          so I assume it is indeed somewhere in LGPL?

                                          But I must admit I am having trouble locating that quoted statement in the actual LGPL. Don't know which version/what source it was taken from....

                                          Meanwhile, I happenstanced across https://www.slideshare.net/BurkhardStubert/using-qt-under-lgplv3. It has 37-page slideshow of what this guy had to say. I don't know/advocate whether what he says is true, but it might be worth a read through as it's aimed specifically at Qt.

                                          J 1 Reply Last reply 7 Feb 2020, 08:46
                                          1

                                          12/30

                                          6 Feb 2020, 08:40

                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          12 out of 30
                                          • First post
                                            12/30
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups
                                          • Search
                                          • Get Qt Extensions
                                          • Unsolved