Qt Creator and other tools

@dcbasso Bummer. Thanks for reporting back though for other people. :)

I wonder if you ever found an answer to this issue ? I have a similar requirement, in that I want to create an online installer that works both ways. It needs to be able to be run in "download-only" mode (no installation, just download the repo). Then my client's IT dept can have a copy of the repo to put on their server, and their users (some of whom don't have internet access) can do a local installation from their local repo. It seems that most of the functionality exists: The offline installer will create a local repo if asked to (CreateLocalRepository in config.xml). This could then be relocated to their server. The online installer can be forced to act like an offline installer by pointing it the local repo. What I can't seem to do is combine 1 and 2 in the same installer. I could create both an offline and an online installer (one for client's IT and one for their users), except that I cannot package all components into the offline installer because some are licensed, and the client should only have access to the components that they have a licence for.

@SGaist said in Qt5LinguistToolsConfig.cmake doesn't exist...: The -nomake examples option should have no influence in the matter. I'm never building with the examples and the linguist related cmake files are generated properly. That is the strangest thing, then. I compiled QT5.9.1 and 5.9.2 several times, and that was the ONLY thing that made the difference.

both should be compiled with the gcc compiler... the directory contains the shared libraries e.g.: libmat.so

gcc: gcc version 6.4.0 20170820 (Debian 6.4.0-4) gdb: GNU gdb 7.11.1 Program code: #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main() { cout << "Hello World!" << endl; return 0; }

@J0J0 said in QtCreator: Project fails to build after renaming an object.: I was never in the embarrising situation of asking friends to "vote for a bug" to get it fixed... Well, who will fix a bug he is not aware of? So we have to report them for sure. All this worked like a charm and the GUI was much more intuitive. The problem in Creator is, that the Widget Designer is in fact a separate program which Creator embeds. This leads to several small problems, like the ones you encounter. But honestly: How often do you rename a button. And I can compare Creator with C++ Builder (6.0), because I'm using both. But I try to avoid using C++ Builder as it is really a pain to work with once you had something much better.

@J0J0 So the conclusion is: Don't use REFACTOR, it's broken... No, its not broken. But it do not try to replace in Ui files. That said, UI files are just XML files and i often use XMLStarlet to change values in them. Creator will just ask if you want to reload it. Just make sure its not open in Designer. ( as its then just overridden) Ps I have all code under code revision an hence have zero fears of changing the UI files. If you do not have, be gentle to it ;)

I copied qt_en.qm and pasted into the SDK translation directory as qt_tr.qm. Command worked. So I think I also need qt SDK translation.

example of code you must insert in your .pro, replace 10.13 by whatever version you want... macx { QMAKE_MAC_SDK = macosx10.13 QMAKE_MAC_SDK_PATH = "/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.13.sdk" }

@jsulm Well... only half innocent. This repo selection is not part of the installer, so, I still hold Qt 50% responsible. Also, why don't they host this tool on their own servers? I hope using the JAIST repository will help me out. Update: getting 1.6MB/s download from the installer after choosing the JAIST repo, where I got max. 150kB/s or so before... This tool should be made more visible on the official Qt webpages, since the functionality it provides is still not available in the official installer. Update 2: Well.. it still takes a lot of time... as 1.6MB/s alternates with periods of a few tens of kB/s...

@QtBob Hi and welcome to devnet forum You mean you are using a 30 day trial for commercial license of Qt? You are here in the opensource forum. Possibly there are users around, who may be able answer your question, but that is not for sure. AFAIK you may receive some official Qt support during the trial period. They have to know for sure, if there are limitations for the trial period.

@Pablo-J-Rogina , @koahnig I tried to include the .pri file in various parts of .pro to see if it could depend on it Reagards

Hi and welcome to devnet, I'd take a look at the QtSDK repo.

Ping @hunger :)

@Foraz Last time I had a similar issue I started simply with a "hello world" dll and checkout what to change in my library source and qmake to get it to work. That was the most straight forward things to do. Instead of using qmake for your projects you shall use CMake as the basis for your projects based Qt creator templates. [edit] There are also some guidelines for dll creation with qt