Best Practice to Add Dynamic QML from C++ data
-
@Placeable I have done something similar my project here. So what that particular code does is it creates a
QQuickItem
from a base QML template as shown here. Then sets some color and font on it. So you can try to do something similar. But rememberQQmlComponent
requiresQQmlEngine
. This is the same with which you must have loaded the QML initially. Also remember that dynamicQQuickItem
also requires a visual parent which is set using setParent. -
@Placeable I have done something similar my project here. So what that particular code does is it creates a
QQuickItem
from a base QML template as shown here. Then sets some color and font on it. So you can try to do something similar. But rememberQQmlComponent
requiresQQmlEngine
. This is the same with which you must have loaded the QML initially. Also remember that dynamicQQuickItem
also requires a visual parent which is set using setParent.wrote on 22 Sept 2016, 08:21 last edited by Placeable@p3c0 This is great, I like how to create QML from CPP. I came up with a different solution though which I think works but not sure if it is "best practice" - I'd like to experiment the way you did it as well.
Here's how I have done it now to create "dynamic" Texts in QML from CPP data:
In my QAbstractListModel data function I have this field that returns a QVariant:
case TextData: return QVariant::fromValue( someData.textList() ); break;
The implementation of that returns a QList of QObject:
QList<QObject*> SomeData::textList() const { return mTextList; }
I can populate this QList with my TextData class that derives QObject
TextData.cpp:
class TextData : public QObject { Q_OBJECT Q_PROPERTY(QString text READ testString WRITE setTestString NOTIFY testStringChanged) public: explicit TextData(QObject *parent = 0); QString testString() const; void setTestString(const QString &testString); signals: void testStringChanged(QString); private: QString mTestString; };
Then in QML I can do something like this now to create QML Texts and populate them from the CPP data:
Component.onCompleted: { var arr = model.textData; var component = Qt.createComponent("SomeTextLayout.qml"); for ( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) { var txtObject = arr[i]; var txtQml = component.createObject(someParentId); txtQml.text = txtObject.text; ... //Etc fill in more props from the txtObject } }
Again how this is performance wise I am not sure I am inclined to do the QML markup on the CPP side as well.
I'll mark this topic as Solved as I think there is a lot of great input here that would help anyone else in the future.Thanks everyone!
-
@Placeable Beware of Component.onCompleted.
The order of running the onCompleted handlers is undefined.
Due to this it could be possible that your initialized components may be not be available when required. May be create them when you require them.
-
@Placeable Beware of Component.onCompleted.
The order of running the onCompleted handlers is undefined.
Due to this it could be possible that your initialized components may be not be available when required. May be create them when you require them.
wrote on 22 Sept 2016, 09:13 last edited byI am not sure what this means. From my testing I see no issues. You mean there is a chance onCompleted is finished before the nested component.createObject(..) is created for this.
How would one solve this preferably?
-
If you find no issues then continue. Just a warning if you find some odd behavior during your implementaion. In some of my cases I found that onCompleted is not the most reliable place for initialization of components. Sometimes it triggered earlier causing problems to the objects which were intialized in it and which were dependent on others.
-
If you find no issues then continue. Just a warning if you find some odd behavior during your implementaion. In some of my cases I found that onCompleted is not the most reliable place for initialization of components. Sometimes it triggered earlier causing problems to the objects which were intialized in it and which were dependent on others.
-
Haven't tried it, but I'd do something along the lines of:
ApplicationWindow { visible: true width: 640 height: 480 title: "Testing Model" ListView { model: testModel delegate: Rectangle { height: 25 width: 100 Text { id: tmText text: modelData.text anchors.left: parent.left anchors.top: parent.top anchors.bottom: parent.bottom } Text { text: modelData.desctiption anchors.left: tmText.right anchors.right: parent.right anchors.top: parent.top anchors.bottom: parent.bottom } } } }
wrote on 10 Jan 2018, 19:27 last edited bySince this was something new from me and the issue popped up again after a while
I prepared a small wiki article that summarises the technique