Forum organization: why does General Talk > Qt6 still exist?

[FeRDNYC]

I'm not sure I understand why there would still be a General Talk > Qt6, and I'm even more confused why its description would make this statement:

This is where all Qt 6 related questions belong

Surely that's many, many years out of date?

[sierdzio]

@FeRDNYC said in Forum organization: why does General Talk > Qt6 still exist?:

I'm not sure I understand why there would still be a General Talk > Qt6, and I'm even more confused why its description would make this statement:

This is where all Qt 6 related questions belong

Surely that's many, many years out of date?

Yes.

[SGaist]

@sierdzio something for @Nhan-Nguyen to add to the list of things for the update or after.

[FeRDNYC]

😁 You're welcome and/or sorry, @Nhan-Nguyen !

[Nhan Nguyen]

Hmm, according to my common sense, you guys want this Qt 6 sub-category to be moved to another category/ to be removed, isn't it?

[Christian Ehrlicher]

Yes, it should be removed and merged with General and Desktop as Qt6 is the default nowadays.

[SGaist]

The original plan was to merge it back to general and desktop when Qt 6 was out for a long enough time.

[Pl45m4]

@Nhan-Nguyen said in Forum organization: why does General Talk > Qt6 still exist?:

Hmm, according to my common sense, you guys want this Qt 6 sub-category to be moved to another category/ to be removed, isn't it?

@Christian-Ehrlicher said in Forum organization: why does General Talk > Qt6 still exist?:

Yes, it should be removed and merged with General and Desktop as Qt6 is the default nowadays.

This, I would say, but keep the category (leave the space open)... maybe later we can put Qt 7 pre-release related / early Qt 7 stuff there.

[FeRDNYC]

Hm, that's an idea. Maybe rename it to "Qt Next", "Future Qt", something like that?