error Qt requires C++11 support
-
wrote on 13 May 2020, 13:39 last edited by
Hi,
I am becoming rather frustrated with this problem. There seems to be a history of it, I've tried pretty much all of the recommended solutions, but it persists. I cannot create any new projects, nor compile the Qt Src, examples, etc.I am running RHEL 7.7 Server, which includes GCC 4.8, which provides c++11 support. I am trying to use Qt 5.14.2. I've run configure as described in the Src/README. Output of configure says I have c++11 support. I added "CONFIG += c++11" to qt.pro in Src. My make output shows "-std=gnu++11". So, I am asking why this problem is happening?
Thanks
-
Hi,
I am becoming rather frustrated with this problem. There seems to be a history of it, I've tried pretty much all of the recommended solutions, but it persists. I cannot create any new projects, nor compile the Qt Src, examples, etc.I am running RHEL 7.7 Server, which includes GCC 4.8, which provides c++11 support. I am trying to use Qt 5.14.2. I've run configure as described in the Src/README. Output of configure says I have c++11 support. I added "CONFIG += c++11" to qt.pro in Src. My make output shows "-std=gnu++11". So, I am asking why this problem is happening?
Thanks
@MarkS1955 said in error Qt requires C++11 support:
GCC 4.8
Take a look at https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html
"GCC 4.8.1 was the first feature-complete implementation of the 2011 C++ standard"
So, not sure GCC 4.8 is really enough."nor compile the Qt Src" - what errors do you get? Are they actually related to C++11 support?
-
@MarkS1955 said in error Qt requires C++11 support:
GCC 4.8
Take a look at https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html
"GCC 4.8.1 was the first feature-complete implementation of the 2011 C++ standard"
So, not sure GCC 4.8 is really enough."nor compile the Qt Src" - what errors do you get? Are they actually related to C++11 support?
wrote on 13 May 2020, 14:05 last edited by@jsulm Thanks for the reply. I am currently trying to go above GCC 5.0 to see if that will fix it. Kind of seems like it has to be something like that. Here is a sample of the compiler error
In file included from ../../include/QtCore/qbasicatomic.h:1:0
from ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/thread/qatomic.h:46[m[K,
from ../../include/QtCore/qatomic.h:1[m[K,
from global/qglobal.h:130
from global/qt_pch.h:56../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/thread/qbasicatomic.h:61:4
#error "Qt requires C++11 support"
#error "Qt requires C++11 support" -
wrote on 13 May 2020, 14:21 last edited by
Update to this post, I am actually using GCC 4.8.5, which should contain all the c++11 features. Again, this problem is rather bizarre.
-
Update to this post, I am actually using GCC 4.8.5, which should contain all the c++11 features. Again, this problem is rather bizarre.
wrote on 13 May 2020, 14:34 last edited by JonB@MarkS1955
For the record, from yourqbasicatomic.h:61:4
error message you are falling foul in this code:// If C++11 atomics are supported, use them! // Note that constexpr support is sometimes disabled in QNX builds but its // library has <atomic>. #elif defined(Q_COMPILER_ATOMICS) && (defined(Q_COMPILER_CONSTEXPR) || defined(Q_OS_QNX)) # include <QtCore/qatomic_cxx11.h> ... // No fallback #else # error "Qt requires C++11 support" #endif
so it appears to be your lack of
constexpr
support. Not that I know there's anything you can do about it....It's RHEL 8.x which supports
gcc
8/9+....However, isn't the following saying you can get that for your RHEL 7 (even if it isn't pre-shipped)?
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/11/13/gcc-8-2-ga-rhel/We are pleased to announce general availability of Red Hat Developer Toolset 8 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7. The key new components for this release are:
GCC 8.2.1
Like other tools, these are easily installable via
yum
-
@MarkS1955
For the record, from yourqbasicatomic.h:61:4
error message you are falling foul in this code:// If C++11 atomics are supported, use them! // Note that constexpr support is sometimes disabled in QNX builds but its // library has <atomic>. #elif defined(Q_COMPILER_ATOMICS) && (defined(Q_COMPILER_CONSTEXPR) || defined(Q_OS_QNX)) # include <QtCore/qatomic_cxx11.h> ... // No fallback #else # error "Qt requires C++11 support" #endif
so it appears to be your lack of
constexpr
support. Not that I know there's anything you can do about it....It's RHEL 8.x which supports
gcc
8/9+....However, isn't the following saying you can get that for your RHEL 7 (even if it isn't pre-shipped)?
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/11/13/gcc-8-2-ga-rhel/We are pleased to announce general availability of Red Hat Developer Toolset 8 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7. The key new components for this release are:
GCC 8.2.1
Like other tools, these are easily installable via
yum
-
wrote on 14 May 2020, 06:17 last edited by
GCC 4.8.5 was released in 2015, but GCC 5.1 was also already released at that time. The first version of GCC 4.8 even dates back to 2013. I am not sure if it makes sense to back that far for a proper Qt version.
On RedHat you should have a look at
devtools
in order to install newer versions of GCC. These will provide whole programming environments (including proper libraries, etc.) tailored to the selected version. -
GCC 4.8.5 was released in 2015, but GCC 5.1 was also already released at that time. The first version of GCC 4.8 even dates back to 2013. I am not sure if it makes sense to back that far for a proper Qt version.
On RedHat you should have a look at
devtools
in order to install newer versions of GCC. These will provide whole programming environments (including proper libraries, etc.) tailored to the selected version.wrote on 14 May 2020, 08:03 last edited by@SimonSchroeder said in error Qt requires C++11 support:
On RedHat you should have a look at devtools in order to install newer versions of GCC. These will provide whole programming environments (including proper libraries, etc.) tailored to the selected version.
I already provided the OP with the link for gcc 8 under RHEL 6/7.
-
wrote on 15 May 2020, 14:33 last edited by
Hi, I just wanted to say thanks for your replies. I have resolved my issue with this by going back to version 5.12.8. This version gives me everything I need, and also fixes another bug issue we were having with the 5.9.7 distribution. We are up and running, forms compiling now, etc.
5/9