How to build real template class?

Anonymous_Banned275

I do not agree with your opinion : What are you trying to achieve?
My missed point is - Qt documentation call the result of their process of building a class a " template". It is NOT template TYPE by definition, it is Qt miss use of a term.
I have no illusion that pointing that out will "achieve " anything. Qt is pushing its own terminology and continue to do so irregardless of me , a user , opinion. They are the experts , in their opinions / view.
My only "achievement' could be to make others users of Qt aware. That is about all I could hope for.

Christian Ehrlicher

It is creating a template for a class derived from QObject, not a template class. You are mixing different stuff.

Asperamanca

Could you link the relevant documentation page?

Anonymous_Banned275

https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_for_Beginners

Asperamanca

"Template" in this context is simply an English word in the same way as you may have a "Template for a presentation", i.e. something generic to help you get started, from which you can then customize what you want.

Anonymous_Banned275

I disagree , especially when it is " for beginners" .
Cheers

Axel Spoerl

It is NOT template TYPE by definition, it is Qt miss use of a term.

That's simply wrong, @AnneRanch.
The misunderstanding is entirely on your side.

As @Asperamanca indicated, the term "template" is standard English vocabulary. If you reserve it exclusively for what is a template in C++, you limit your own vocabulary.

The documentation page you referred, is truly outdated, but it doesn't contain anything wrong. It uses word "template" in two different contexts:

TEMPLATE directive of qmake
creating a class definition, following a template (as @Asperamanca already explained)

The page does not contain any mention of the term "template" in C++ code. That makes the context pretty obvious for any C++ programmer, beginners included.

Asperamanca

@AnneRanch said in How to build real template class?:

I disagree , especially when it is " for beginners" .
Cheers

I agree that the conflict of terms here is a bit unfortunate. Then again, I cannot come up with a more fitting term for "template" in this context. If you have a better idea, you can also write documentation suggestion to bugreports.qt.io

Pl45m4

@Asperamanca said in How to build real template class?:

I cannot come up with a more fitting term for "template" in this context

I can think of another term (don't know if better or not), but I'm not allowed to comment :)))
The first part is a color, the second part of the word is what a certain I/O device does :)))

Redman

@Pl45m4 yellow fax

Pl45m4

@Redman said in How to build real template class?:

yellow fax

Yep. That's it :))
You're good :D

Axel Spoerl

@Redman
C'mon, ever seen a yellow fax?
He meant orange jam, obviously.

Pl45m4

@Axel-Spoerl said in How to build real template class?:

He meant orange jam, obviously.

Actually I was referring to commonly used term "reddisplay".
... but I agreed to @Redman so he wouldn't feel bad :)))

jsulm

bluescreen :-)

Pl45m4

@jsulm said in How to build real template class?:

bluescreen :-)

That's what you get when using yellow fax wrong :))

Axel Spoerl

I got it: Black Label!
Edit: Green Card.

J.Hilk

This took me exceedingly long to get omfg.

FeRDNYC

@AnneRanch said in How to build real template class?:

https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_for_Beginners

The issue brought up here is far from the most objectionable thing on that page. I mean, have you seen THIS nonsense?

Qt (pronounced as "cute", not "cu-tee")

Not just no, but HELL no!

Pl45m4

@FeRDNYC said in How to build real template class?:

Qt (pronounced as "cute", not "cu-tee")

Not just no, but HELL no!

More than enough people say it like this...
I mean, there is no right or wrong.
But I also don't like it as "cute".

JonB

@Pl45m4 said in How to build real template class?:

But I also don't like it as "cute".

Interesting. I don't like it either and prefer "Q-T", but I make myself say "Cute" against my preference.