Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. General talk
  3. The Lounge
  4. On the indexing of arrays and other little wonders
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

On the indexing of arrays and other little wonders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
24 Posts 4 Posters 7.3k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • kshegunovK kshegunov

    @Joel-Bodenmann said:

    It's just funny to see that a very decent engineer/professor doesn't like enumeration to start with zero.

    Everyone has the right to have no taste ...

    I'll pull the argument that @kshegunov stated: It's the offset of the element :p

    I thought this was common knowledge.

    How is this:

    int x[5];
    x[2] = 0;
    

    different from:

    *(x + 2) = 0;
    

    PS: Except for the extreme ugliness of the latter that is ... :)

    Joel BodenmannJ Offline
    Joel BodenmannJ Offline
    Joel Bodenmann
    wrote on last edited by Joel Bodenmann
    #9

    @kshegunov This is probably the point where I can dump this one...

    #include <iostream>
    #include <string>
    
    int main()
    {
    	std::string a[] = {"Hello", "World"};
    	
    	std::cout << 0[a] << std::endl;
    	std::cout << 1[a] << std::endl;
    	
    	return 0;
    }
    

    This proves that operator[] is really nothing but an offset operator (well, one can overload it for classes, yes....).

    Industrial process automation software: https://simulton.com
    Embedded Graphics & GUI library: https://ugfx.io

    kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Joel BodenmannJ Joel Bodenmann

      @kshegunov This is probably the point where I can dump this one...

      #include <iostream>
      #include <string>
      
      int main()
      {
      	std::string a[] = {"Hello", "World"};
      	
      	std::cout << 0[a] << std::endl;
      	std::cout << 1[a] << std::endl;
      	
      	return 0;
      }
      

      This proves that operator[] is really nothing but an offset operator (well, one can overload it for classes, yes....).

      kshegunovK Offline
      kshegunovK Offline
      kshegunov
      Moderators
      wrote on last edited by kshegunov
      #10

      @Joel-Bodenmann

      Man, this:

      std::cout << 0[a] << std::endl;
      

      shouldn't work even on Friday ...

      By the way, the proper way to unnecessarily make things look unfathomable is to use fully qualified access:

      std::cout << a.operator[] (0) << std::endl;
      

      :)

      Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Joel BodenmannJ Offline
        Joel BodenmannJ Offline
        Joel Bodenmann
        wrote on last edited by Joel Bodenmann
        #11

        @kshegunov said:

        By the way, the proper way to unnecessarily make things look unfathomable is to use fully qualified access:

        std::cout << a.operator[] (0) << std::endl;
        

        Well, that won't work with plain arrays ;)
        Also you can't annoy C people with that.

        Industrial process automation software: https://simulton.com
        Embedded Graphics & GUI library: https://ugfx.io

        kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Joel BodenmannJ Joel Bodenmann

          @kshegunov said:

          By the way, the proper way to unnecessarily make things look unfathomable is to use fully qualified access:

          std::cout << a.operator[] (0) << std::endl;
          

          Well, that won't work with plain arrays ;)
          Also you can't annoy C people with that.

          kshegunovK Offline
          kshegunovK Offline
          kshegunov
          Moderators
          wrote on last edited by kshegunov
          #12

          @Joel-Bodenmann
          You youngsters and your requirements ... plain arrays are plain, they need no stinkin' (custom) operators in the first place ... :D

          Also you can't annoy C people with that.

          With this I agree completely, but they can still annoy you by naming their variables new, like this:

          char new[5]; //< This always makes my day
          

          Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

          the_T Joel BodenmannJ 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • kshegunovK kshegunov

            @Joel-Bodenmann
            You youngsters and your requirements ... plain arrays are plain, they need no stinkin' (custom) operators in the first place ... :D

            Also you can't annoy C people with that.

            With this I agree completely, but they can still annoy you by naming their variables new, like this:

            char new[5]; //< This always makes my day
            
            the_T Offline
            the_T Offline
            the_
            wrote on last edited by
            #13
            char new[5]; //< This always makes my day
            

            Thats as hard as

            public class if {
            
            } 
            

            ;)

            -- No support in PM --

            kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • kshegunovK kshegunov

              @Joel-Bodenmann
              You youngsters and your requirements ... plain arrays are plain, they need no stinkin' (custom) operators in the first place ... :D

              Also you can't annoy C people with that.

              With this I agree completely, but they can still annoy you by naming their variables new, like this:

              char new[5]; //< This always makes my day
              
              Joel BodenmannJ Offline
              Joel BodenmannJ Offline
              Joel Bodenmann
              wrote on last edited by Joel Bodenmann
              #14

              @kshegunov
              What about #define float int? :p
              If you hide stuff like this: #define if(x) you can truly fuck someone's day.

              However, the most evil one might be this: #define struct union.

              Industrial process automation software: https://simulton.com
              Embedded Graphics & GUI library: https://ugfx.io

              the_T 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Joel BodenmannJ Joel Bodenmann

                @kshegunov
                What about #define float int? :p
                If you hide stuff like this: #define if(x) you can truly fuck someone's day.

                However, the most evil one might be this: #define struct union.

                the_T Offline
                the_T Offline
                the_
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                @Joel-Bodenmann

                Or try to

                #define true false
                

                in a global headerfile in a large project ;)

                -- No support in PM --

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • the_T the_
                  char new[5]; //< This always makes my day
                  

                  Thats as hard as

                  public class if {
                  
                  } 
                  

                  ;)

                  kshegunovK Offline
                  kshegunovK Offline
                  kshegunov
                  Moderators
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  @the_ said:

                  public class if {
                  
                  } 
                  

                  Ouch! There's tons of weird stuff a C dev might do, like:

                  struct class object;
                  

                  @Joel-Bodenmann

                  Aha! We are bringing the heavy artillery, aren't we?

                  Since the preprocessor is not part of the language, and it's run before anything else ... and it's just string substitution, you can make very ugly stuff, like:

                  #define true 0
                  #define false 1
                  

                  Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                  Joel BodenmannJ the_T 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • kshegunovK kshegunov

                    @the_ said:

                    public class if {
                    
                    } 
                    

                    Ouch! There's tons of weird stuff a C dev might do, like:

                    struct class object;
                    

                    @Joel-Bodenmann

                    Aha! We are bringing the heavy artillery, aren't we?

                    Since the preprocessor is not part of the language, and it's run before anything else ... and it's just string substitution, you can make very ugly stuff, like:

                    #define true 0
                    #define false 1
                    
                    Joel BodenmannJ Offline
                    Joel BodenmannJ Offline
                    Joel Bodenmann
                    wrote on last edited by Joel Bodenmann
                    #17

                    @kshegunov

                    Aha! We are bringing the heavy artillery, aren't we?

                    No Sir, this is the heavy artillery:

                    #define if(x) if((__LINE__ % > 500)^(x))
                    

                    Everything works well as long as the source doesn't grow larger than 500 lines.

                    And if you want to keep people from fucking with your sources/algorithms, you can carefully write a program with this:

                    #define if(x) if((__LINE__ % 5==0)^(x))
                    

                    If done right, your stuff will work fine for as long as nobody adds or removes a line.

                    </topic>

                    Industrial process automation software: https://simulton.com
                    Embedded Graphics & GUI library: https://ugfx.io

                    kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Joel BodenmannJ Joel Bodenmann

                      @kshegunov

                      Aha! We are bringing the heavy artillery, aren't we?

                      No Sir, this is the heavy artillery:

                      #define if(x) if((__LINE__ % > 500)^(x))
                      

                      Everything works well as long as the source doesn't grow larger than 500 lines.

                      And if you want to keep people from fucking with your sources/algorithms, you can carefully write a program with this:

                      #define if(x) if((__LINE__ % 5==0)^(x))
                      

                      If done right, your stuff will work fine for as long as nobody adds or removes a line.

                      </topic>

                      kshegunovK Offline
                      kshegunovK Offline
                      kshegunov
                      Moderators
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      @Joel-Bodenmann

                      This is (somewhat) tractable. My greatest clash with the preprocessor was when I was served with a "class" that defined a 256 item color table by means of members for each of 256 colors ... the properties, getters and setters were naturally defined through preprocessor macros. It was one of the low points of my life ... :)

                      Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • kshegunovK kshegunov

                        @the_ said:

                        public class if {
                        
                        } 
                        

                        Ouch! There's tons of weird stuff a C dev might do, like:

                        struct class object;
                        

                        @Joel-Bodenmann

                        Aha! We are bringing the heavy artillery, aren't we?

                        Since the preprocessor is not part of the language, and it's run before anything else ... and it's just string substitution, you can make very ugly stuff, like:

                        #define true 0
                        #define false 1
                        
                        the_T Offline
                        the_T Offline
                        the_
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        @kshegunov said:

                        @the_ said:

                        public class if {
                        
                        } 
                        

                        Ouch! There's tons of weird stuff a C dev might do, like:

                        I think it was Java code where i found this crap :)

                        -- No support in PM --

                        kshegunovK Joel BodenmannJ 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • the_T the_

                          @kshegunov said:

                          @the_ said:

                          public class if {
                          
                          } 
                          

                          Ouch! There's tons of weird stuff a C dev might do, like:

                          I think it was Java code where i found this crap :)

                          kshegunovK Offline
                          kshegunovK Offline
                          kshegunov
                          Moderators
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          @the_

                          I think it was Java code where i found this crap

                          Well, Java is C++'s little sister, too bad her genes got screwed up and she turned out a freak ;)

                          Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • the_T the_

                            @kshegunov said:

                            @the_ said:

                            public class if {
                            
                            } 
                            

                            Ouch! There's tons of weird stuff a C dev might do, like:

                            I think it was Java code where i found this crap :)

                            Joel BodenmannJ Offline
                            Joel BodenmannJ Offline
                            Joel Bodenmann
                            wrote on last edited by Joel Bodenmann
                            #21

                            @kshegunov
                            You might like my embedded graphics/GUI library then. Everything that can be done with preprocessor macros is done using preprocessor macros:

                            https://bitbucket.org/Tectu/ugfx/src/fb100bcc25225cfad0bab5d40bef1db703e9670a/src/gdisp/gdisp_colors.h?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default
                            https://bitbucket.org/Tectu/ugfx/src/fb100bcc25225cfad0bab5d40bef1db703e9670a/src/gdisp/gdisp_driver.h?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#gdisp_driver.h-812

                            If you keep browsing the sources you will find other goodies :)

                            Industrial process automation software: https://simulton.com
                            Embedded Graphics & GUI library: https://ugfx.io

                            kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Joel BodenmannJ Joel Bodenmann

                              @kshegunov
                              You might like my embedded graphics/GUI library then. Everything that can be done with preprocessor macros is done using preprocessor macros:

                              https://bitbucket.org/Tectu/ugfx/src/fb100bcc25225cfad0bab5d40bef1db703e9670a/src/gdisp/gdisp_colors.h?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default
                              https://bitbucket.org/Tectu/ugfx/src/fb100bcc25225cfad0bab5d40bef1db703e9670a/src/gdisp/gdisp_driver.h?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#gdisp_driver.h-812

                              If you keep browsing the sources you will find other goodies :)

                              kshegunovK Offline
                              kshegunovK Offline
                              kshegunov
                              Moderators
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              @Joel-Bodenmann
                              Right ... because my life doesn't suck enough and I would like to suffer more? I'm with @Wieland on that preprocessor magic - I avoid as the devil avoids incense ... there's a whole battery of cheat-sheets for dealing with that ugly monster ...

                              Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                              Joel BodenmannJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • kshegunovK kshegunov

                                @Joel-Bodenmann
                                Right ... because my life doesn't suck enough and I would like to suffer more? I'm with @Wieland on that preprocessor magic - I avoid as the devil avoids incense ... there's a whole battery of cheat-sheets for dealing with that ugly monster ...

                                Joel BodenmannJ Offline
                                Joel BodenmannJ Offline
                                Joel Bodenmann
                                wrote on last edited by Joel Bodenmann
                                #23

                                @kshegunov
                                If your target processor runs on 64 MHz and has 32 kB RAM and you want to do some graphics/GUI on it, you might be thankful that there are masochistic people out there :)

                                Of course I'd never do that on a desktop system.

                                Actually, the real problem I see with preprocessor macros is not actually writing and maintaining them but debugging them.

                                Industrial process automation software: https://simulton.com
                                Embedded Graphics & GUI library: https://ugfx.io

                                kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • Joel BodenmannJ Joel Bodenmann

                                  @kshegunov
                                  If your target processor runs on 64 MHz and has 32 kB RAM and you want to do some graphics/GUI on it, you might be thankful that there are masochistic people out there :)

                                  Of course I'd never do that on a desktop system.

                                  Actually, the real problem I see with preprocessor macros is not actually writing and maintaining them but debugging them.

                                  kshegunovK Offline
                                  kshegunovK Offline
                                  kshegunov
                                  Moderators
                                  wrote on last edited by kshegunov
                                  #24

                                  @Joel-Bodenmann
                                  One of the reasons I stick to real CPUs. ;)
                                  Joke aside, I leave that not-enough ram/CPU time struggle to engineers/embedded devs, I don't have the stomach for it to be honest. :D

                                  As a side note I'm not completely convinced using #define for constants is really warranted.
                                  If you're doing a comparison for example, this would (if I remember correctly) expand to something along the lines of:

                                  mov eax, 0x...      # Set the constant
                                  test eax, [0x...]   # Do the comparison with a field from memory
                                  

                                  If you use a simple constant (const static variable), the above should be pretty much the same:

                                  mov eax, [0x...]    # Set the constant (from memory this time)
                                  test eax, [0x...]   # Do the comparison with a field from memory
                                  

                                  Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0

                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups
                                  • Search
                                  • Get Qt Extensions
                                  • Unsolved