Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. QObject::connect returns false
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

QObject::connect returns false

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved General and Desktop
48 Posts 5 Posters 6.4k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JonBJ JonB

    @SPlatten
    Nothing obviously wrong there then. Please put in the Q_ASSERTs to make me happy?!

    And follow all of the suggestions from @KroMignon above!

    SPlattenS Offline
    SPlattenS Offline
    SPlatten
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @JonB , so the source now reads:

    Q_ASSERT(pobjEmulator);
    Q_ASSERT(pobjService);
    bool blnRC(QObject::connect(pobjEmulator, SIGNAL(epoch(long))
                               ,pobjService, SLOT(updateTime(long))));
    

    Built and run, no assertions, blnRC is false.

    Kind Regards,
    Sy

    JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J.HilkJ J.Hilk

      @SPlatten is this potentially cross thread ?

      or more in general, the long typdef may not be correctly registered with the meta system.

      you could use qint32, that should work.

      SPlattenS Offline
      SPlattenS Offline
      SPlatten
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      @J-Hilk , no, not at the moment, this is just simple test code, nothing complex at all....just literally creating instances of each, call to connect and that is it.

      Kind Regards,
      Sy

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J.HilkJ J.Hilk

        @SPlatten is this potentially cross thread ?

        or more in general, the long typdef may not be correctly registered with the meta system.

        you could use qint32, that should work.

        JonBJ Offline
        JonBJ Offline
        JonB
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        @J-Hilk said in QObject::connect returns false:

        or more in general, the long typdef may not be correctly registered with the meta system.

        long, really??

        SPlattenS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • JonBJ JonB

          @J-Hilk said in QObject::connect returns false:

          or more in general, the long typdef may not be correctly registered with the meta system.

          long, really??

          SPlattenS Offline
          SPlattenS Offline
          SPlatten
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          @JonB , whats wrong ?

          Kind Regards,
          Sy

          JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • SPlattenS SPlatten

            @JonB , whats wrong ?

            JonBJ Offline
            JonBJ Offline
            JonB
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            @SPlatten
            Sorry, what's wrong with what?
            My previous post was just expressing surprise to @J-Hilk that long type might not be "registered with the meta system", but he knows more than I....

            KroMignonK 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J.HilkJ J.Hilk

              @SPlatten is this potentially cross thread ?

              or more in general, the long typdef may not be correctly registered with the meta system.

              you could use qint32, that should work.

              KroMignonK Offline
              KroMignonK Offline
              KroMignon
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              @J-Hilk said in QObject::connect returns false:

              or more in general, the long typdef may not be correctly registered with the meta system.

              But this would not affect to connect() call, only slot may not be called if sender and receiver not in same thread.

              For my comprehension of QObject signals/slots, connect() will only fail if no machting signal or slot signature are found in meta-data. Which are generated by moc.

              It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. (Sherlock Holmes)

              SPlattenS 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • SPlattenS Offline
                SPlattenS Offline
                SPlatten
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                I changed long to int just to be sure, same result.

                Kind Regards,
                Sy

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • SPlattenS SPlatten

                  @JonB , so the source now reads:

                  Q_ASSERT(pobjEmulator);
                  Q_ASSERT(pobjService);
                  bool blnRC(QObject::connect(pobjEmulator, SIGNAL(epoch(long))
                                             ,pobjService, SLOT(updateTime(long))));
                  

                  Built and run, no assertions, blnRC is false.

                  JonBJ Offline
                  JonBJ Offline
                  JonB
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  @SPlatten said in QObject::connect returns false:

                  Built and run, no assertions, blnRC is false.

                  Just checking: how do you know that? I wouldn't trist that if you are only viewing in debugger, as I believe you sometimes do; are you actually outputting the variable's value?

                  SPlattenS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • KroMignonK KroMignon

                    @J-Hilk said in QObject::connect returns false:

                    or more in general, the long typdef may not be correctly registered with the meta system.

                    But this would not affect to connect() call, only slot may not be called if sender and receiver not in same thread.

                    For my comprehension of QObject signals/slots, connect() will only fail if no machting signal or slot signature are found in meta-data. Which are generated by moc.

                    SPlattenS Offline
                    SPlattenS Offline
                    SPlatten
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    @KroMignon I will look at the generated moc files, but as you can see from my posts the prototypes are identical.

                    Kind Regards,
                    Sy

                    JonBJ KroMignonK 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • JonBJ JonB

                      @SPlatten said in QObject::connect returns false:

                      Built and run, no assertions, blnRC is false.

                      Just checking: how do you know that? I wouldn't trist that if you are only viewing in debugger, as I believe you sometimes do; are you actually outputting the variable's value?

                      SPlattenS Offline
                      SPlattenS Offline
                      SPlatten
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      @JonB , I have a break point in the debugger after the connect and can see it contains false.

                      Kind Regards,
                      Sy

                      JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • SPlattenS SPlatten

                        @KroMignon I will look at the generated moc files, but as you can see from my posts the prototypes are identical.

                        JonBJ Offline
                        JonBJ Offline
                        JonB
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        @SPlatten
                        Per @KroMignon, just start by emptying out your build output directory and doing a complete rebuild, just in case. Always start there when Qt gives you something "inexplicable" :)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • JonBJ JonB

                          @SPlatten
                          Sorry, what's wrong with what?
                          My previous post was just expressing surprise to @J-Hilk that long type might not be "registered with the meta system", but he knows more than I....

                          KroMignonK Offline
                          KroMignonK Offline
                          KroMignon
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          @JonB said in QObject::connect returns false:

                          My previous post was just expressing surprise to @J-Hilk that long type might not be "registered with the meta system", but he knows more than I..

                          For inter-thread communication, or in case of Qt::QueuedConnection, parameters needs to be copied. So QMeta needs to know how to create a copy of them. This is way all types needs to be registered. Some are already registered my Qt, some not ;)

                          It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. (Sherlock Holmes)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • SPlattenS SPlatten

                            @JonB , I have a break point in the debugger after the connect and can see it contains false.

                            JonBJ Offline
                            JonBJ Offline
                            JonB
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            @SPlatten said in QObject::connect returns false:

                            @JonB , I have a break point in the debugger after the connect and can see it contains false.

                            Noooo.
                            Like I said, print it out........

                            SPlattenS 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • JonBJ JonB

                              @SPlatten said in QObject::connect returns false:

                              @JonB , I have a break point in the debugger after the connect and can see it contains false.

                              Noooo.
                              Like I said, print it out........

                              SPlattenS Offline
                              SPlattenS Offline
                              SPlatten
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              @JonB, just did that adding:

                              qDebug() << "connect: " << blnRC;
                              

                              Shown in console as:

                              connect: false
                              

                              Kind Regards,
                              Sy

                              JonBJ 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • SPlattenS SPlatten

                                @JonB, just did that adding:

                                qDebug() << "connect: " << blnRC;
                                

                                Shown in console as:

                                connect: false
                                
                                JonBJ Offline
                                JonBJ Offline
                                JonB
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                @SPlatten
                                OK, damn!
                                Just I warn you now: do not rely on what you see in the debugger for values of variables...!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • SPlattenS SPlatten

                                  @KroMignon I will look at the generated moc files, but as you can see from my posts the prototypes are identical.

                                  KroMignonK Offline
                                  KroMignonK Offline
                                  KroMignon
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @SPlatten said in QObject::connect returns false:

                                  I will look at the generated moc files, but as you can see from my posts the prototypes are identical.

                                  Are you sure header files are in HEADERS in your PRO file?
                                  Did you (re)run qmake?
                                  You could also try to remove the build directory to force moc re-run.

                                  It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. (Sherlock Holmes)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • SPlattenS SPlatten

                                    @JonB, just did that adding:

                                    qDebug() << "connect: " << blnRC;
                                    

                                    Shown in console as:

                                    connect: false
                                    
                                    JonBJ Offline
                                    JonBJ Offline
                                    JonB
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @SPlatten
                                    Like I said, have you done a delete and fresh rebuild?
                                    Does clsTimeEmu have Q_OBJECT in it?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • SPlattenS Offline
                                      SPlattenS Offline
                                      SPlatten
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @J-Hilk , @JonB , @KroMignon , I've looked at both moc files, moc_clsTimeEmu.cpp has the signal:

                                      // SIGNAL_0
                                      void clsTimeEmu::epoch(int _t1)
                                      {
                                          void *_a[] = { 0, const_cast<void*>reinterpret_cast<const void*>(&_t)) };
                                          QMetaObject::activate(this, &staticMetaObject, 0, _a);
                                      }
                                      

                                      moc_clsSchdSrv.cpp does not have anything that looks like the slot, no mention of updateTime at all, why ?

                                      Kind Regards,
                                      Sy

                                      J.HilkJ KroMignonK JonBJ 3 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • SPlattenS SPlatten

                                        @J-Hilk , @JonB , @KroMignon , I've looked at both moc files, moc_clsTimeEmu.cpp has the signal:

                                        // SIGNAL_0
                                        void clsTimeEmu::epoch(int _t1)
                                        {
                                            void *_a[] = { 0, const_cast<void*>reinterpret_cast<const void*>(&_t)) };
                                            QMetaObject::activate(this, &staticMetaObject, 0, _a);
                                        }
                                        

                                        moc_clsSchdSrv.cpp does not have anything that looks like the slot, no mention of updateTime at all, why ?

                                        J.HilkJ Offline
                                        J.HilkJ Offline
                                        J.Hilk
                                        Moderators
                                        wrote on last edited by J.Hilk
                                        #26

                                        @SPlatten well, can you post more of the clsSchdSrv header ?


                                        Be aware of the Qt Code of Conduct, when posting : https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct


                                        Q: What's that?
                                        A: It's blue light.
                                        Q: What does it do?
                                        A: It turns blue.

                                        SPlattenS 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • SPlattenS SPlatten

                                          @J-Hilk , @JonB , @KroMignon , I've looked at both moc files, moc_clsTimeEmu.cpp has the signal:

                                          // SIGNAL_0
                                          void clsTimeEmu::epoch(int _t1)
                                          {
                                              void *_a[] = { 0, const_cast<void*>reinterpret_cast<const void*>(&_t)) };
                                              QMetaObject::activate(this, &staticMetaObject, 0, _a);
                                          }
                                          

                                          moc_clsSchdSrv.cpp does not have anything that looks like the slot, no mention of updateTime at all, why ?

                                          KroMignonK Offline
                                          KroMignonK Offline
                                          KroMignon
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @SPlatten said in QObject::connect returns false:

                                          moc_clsSchdSrv.cpp does not have anything that looks like the slot, no mention of updateTime at all, why ?

                                          Some time Qt-Creator do not detect changes is HEADERS files, so moc will not be re-run.
                                          This is why I suggest you to try to re-run yourself qmake and, if this not help, remove the build directory (as also suggested by @JonB ) to force full rebuild (with moc).

                                          But first, make sure all headers are present in HEADERS of your PRO file.

                                          It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. (Sherlock Holmes)

                                          SPlattenS 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups
                                          • Search
                                          • Get Qt Extensions
                                          • Unsolved