Please help with lambda sytax

[Pl45m4]

@AnneRanch

Can you please clarify what your final goal is? It seems that some of your recent topics (incl. this one) are going in the wrong direction...

You started here with an error in your connect statement, but we obviously can not know whether your connection makes sense in your case or not.

If you want to transfer (i.e. "copy") items, you've clicked in one listWidget to the second listWidget, do what @JonB suggested here.

addItem only works, if you have a "free" QListWidgetItem. So even if we correct your mistake, it wont help you or work at all.
The item, that the clicked function returns, belongs already to one QListWidget, so you cant just add it to a second one.

Changing your code inside lambda to this might work (not tested)

// creates a copy of the clicked item, instead of trying to move it
QListWidgetItem * newItem = new QListWidgetItem(pItem);
ui->list_2->addItem( newItem );

The connection as seen in your picture equals somewhat like this (lambda style):

connect(ui->list, &QListWidget::currentTextChanged, [=](QString s){

ui->plainTextEdit2->appendPlainText(s);
});

[Anonymous_Banned275]

@Pl45m4 said in Please help with lambda sytax:

@AnneRanch

Can you please clarify what your final goal is? It seems that some of your recent topics (incl. this one) are going in the wrong direction...

You started here with an error in your connect statement, but we obviously can not know whether your connection makes sense in your case or not.

If you want to transfer (i.e. "copy") items, you've clicked in one listWidget to the second listWidget, do what @JonB suggested here.

addItem only works, if you have a "free" QListWidgetItem. So even if we correct your mistake, it wont help you or work at all.
The item, that the clicked function returns, belongs already to one QListWidget, so you cant just add it to a second one.

Changing your code inside lambda to this might work (not tested)

// creates a copy of the clicked item, instead of trying to move it
QListWidgetItem * newItem = new QListWidgetItem(pItem);
ui->list_2->addItem( newItem );

The connection as seen in your picture equals somewhat like this (lambda style):

connect(ui->list, &QListWidget::currentTextChanged, [=](QString s){

ui->plainTextEdit2->appendPlainText(s);
});

In general terms - The objective is to copy an item from one widget to another.
It is actually QString, not a generic "item" I want to copy.

The QtDesigner does that with the screen shot of SIGNAL/SLOT I have posted. No problem.

Yes, I do not know how to convert QtDesigner XML GUI to plain C code, but if QtDesigner apparently works without creating new "item" why is it necessary to create new item in code? But that is not main issue.

To avoid further r misunderstanding - help me to duplicate XML in C code first . Then do the lambda and then copy between dialogs. Baby steps.

I can just temporary delete the QtDesigner XML to test the plain C code.

Perhaps screen shot what I have now?

Eventually "automatically" copy each line of text from Bluetooth scanner dialog "nearby BT devices" to main window Tab2 "nearby BT devices".

The unnamed text under "Connect" button , done by QtDesigner, is what I want to duplicate in code.

[Anonymous_Banned275]

Please note - I am posting this to illustrate the problem, please please please - NO comments on my programming style!

My primary goal is to duplicate XML "connect" using code.
The attached code and its variations generally compiles - that is one goal done.

HOWEVER - it crashes during run time and I SUSPECT the problem is
after
clicking button 11 my code builds new instance of scanner dialog and it has build-in timers . The "list" is , in theory, filed AFTER each item individual timer expire.
BUT
my test connect is executed immediately after the first timer expires and the "item" is changed .

I am asking - is it possible I have a timing problem?

Here is my current - under construction connect to copy the "list" lines.
All it does - just compiles and cannot be tested , in existing code , due to this issue.

#ifdef BYPASS
    // interacts with pushing buitto 11
    // keeps crashing
    
    connect(
                this->ui->list,
                //          SIGNAL(ui->list->currentTextChanged()),
                SIGNAL(ui->list->itemDoubleClicked(*pItem)),
                //           SIGNAL(DDD->ui->list->itemChanged(TEST_LABEL)),
                //           SIGNAL(itemClicked(QListWidgetItem *)),
                //              SIGNAL(itemChanged(TEST_LABEL)),
                this->ui->plainTextEdit,
                //           SLOT(DDD->ui->plainTextEdit->appendPlainText(TEST_LABEL))
                //             SLOT(appendPlainText(TEST_LABEL))
                SLOT(ui->plainTextEdit->appendPlainText(*pItem)));
    //           );
    
#endif
    
    

This is how it tracks when working - without the code above

QDEBUG TRACE 
QDEBUG TRACE TASK 
		 END imoplement Device DiscoiveryDialog  

QDEBUG TRACE TASK 
		 find nearby BT devices 

file      /media/f/QT/QT_PROJECT/TEST_PROJECT_14/mainwindow_cat_tab.cpp
function  on_pushButton_11_clicked
@line     236
TEMPORARY EXIT 
/home/f/build-TEST_PROJECT-Desktop-Debug/TEST_PROJECT exited with code 0

And this is failing track

QDEBUG TRACE 
QDEBUG TRACE TASK 
		 START imoplement Device DiscoveryDialog  

QDEBUG TRACE TASK 
		 find nearby BT devices 

file      /media/f/QT/QT_PROJECT/TEST_PROJECT_14/mainwindow_cat_tab.cpp
function  on_pushButton_11_clicked
@line     206
TEMPORARY EXIT 
TRACE SCAN FLOW 
			 START TOK TRACE SCAN FLOW CONSTRUCTOR 
			DeviceDiscoveryDialog::DeviceDiscoveryDialog(QWidget *parent)


TEMPORARY exit  @line 
133
The program has unexpectedly finished.
/home/f/build-TEST_PROJECT-Desktop-Debug/TEST_PROJECT crashed

Again - all I am asking - is it possible I have a timing problem?

[jsulm]

@AnneRanch said in Please help with lambda sytax:

connect(
this->ui->list,
// SIGNAL(ui->list->currentTextChanged()),
SIGNAL(ui->list->itemDoubleClicked(*pItem)),
// SIGNAL(DDD->ui->list->itemChanged(TEST_LABEL)),
// SIGNAL(itemClicked(QListWidgetItem *)),
// SIGNAL(itemChanged(TEST_LABEL)),
this->ui->plainTextEdit,
// SLOT(DDD->ui->plainTextEdit->appendPlainText(TEST_LABEL))
// SLOT(appendPlainText(TEST_LABEL))
SLOT(ui->plainTextEdit->appendPlainText(*pItem)));
// );

This is invalid connect() call. Please check https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/signalsandslots.html And it is better to use Qt5 connect() syntax to detect such issues during compile time instead of run time.
It should be

connect(
    this->ui->list,
    SIGNAL(itemDoubleClicked(QListWidgetItem*)),
    this->ui->plainTextEdit,
    SLOT(appendPlainText(QListWidgetItem*)));

But this will also not work as QPlainTextEdit does not have a slot appendPlainText which takes a QListWidgetItem* as parameter (use new Qt5 connect syntax and a lambda)...

[JonB]

@AnneRanch
As @jsulm has said. As long as you use the old-style SIGNAL & SLOT() macros, you are liable to have code which compiles OK but does not behave correctly at runtime. With the new style syntax, if the signal/slot code is wrong, you get told at compile-time. It might seem harder to get it right, but at least you know that when it does compile it will do what you expect when you run it; if it does not compile, you have to sort it out to be correct at that stage.

[Anonymous_Banned275]

@jsulm said in Please help with lambda sytax:

But this will also not work as QPlainTextEdit does not have a slot appendPlainText which takes a QListWidgetItem* as parameter (use new Qt5 connect syntax and a lambda)...

I do appreciate the post.
It may seems strange, but at this point I am NOT after "it" working.
I just need to figure out WHY adding this "connect" , in any form or format , crashes the program.
After I figure out the crasher I will work on form / format/ style.
Of course I could verify the "connect" using separate test program.

[jsulm]

@AnneRanch said in Please help with lambda sytax:

function on_pushButton_11_clicked
@line 206

Can you show your on_pushButton_11_clicked? The crash is there at line 206.

[Pl45m4]

@AnneRanch

Back to lambdas:

You said, you are struggling to understand lambda connections correctly.
It's not as complicated as it might look.

• You have your sender (first argument)

  connect(ui->list,.....)
  

• You have your sender's class + signal

   connect(ui->list, &QListWidget::itemDoubleClicked,.....)
  

• Then you can define a scope for your lambda

  connect(ui->list, &QListWidget::itemDoubleClicked, this,......)
  

• the last part consists of the capture, the function or slot arguments and the actual code itself, using the passed and captured values

  • Capture

    • "[ ]": None of the variables from current class / scope are captured and can be used inside lambda "code"
    • " [=]": Captures everything (by value!)
    • "[this] ": (current instance) or any combination of variables (e.g. [x, a]), to pick variables you need explicitely.
    • "[&]" or "[ &someVar ]": Captures by reference. Changes made inside lambda will affect and change the captured variable outside the lambda as well ( Thx, @JonB )

  • Signal / Slot arguments after capture inside ( .... ), e.g. if signal sends a QListWidgetItem, you need a (QListWidgetItem *item) here.

  • lambda code inside { .... }

    • do whatever you like and what you would put in your slot here.

One big advantage using lambda connections is, that you can connect signals to slots (or "code"), that would be incompatible using a "direct" connection because of any reason (e.g. parameter mismatch).

Simple example:

// signal
void signal(QString s);
// slot
void onSignalFired(int i);

A direct connection of these two won't work neither using the SIGNAL(...) / SLOT( ... ) syntax
(-> crash / error at runtime),
nor using the function based connection &Class::signal... &Class::onSignalFired
( -> wont compile).

With lambda, you can make it work:

connect(this, &Class::signal, [] (QString s) {  onSignalFired( s.toInt() ); } ); 

Instead of calling the slot, you could also skip the slot and do whatever you want to do with this string inside the lambda directly, e.g. send your number to a QLineEdit ("A" would lead to a 65, simple ASCII).

@AnneRanch said in Please help with lambda sytax:

Here is my current - under construction connect to copy the "list" lines.
All it does - just compiles and cannot be tested , in existing code , due to this issue.

... and this is exactly where you can make use of lambdas ( as @jsulm already said ).
Pass your QListWidgetItem from signal to your lambda, get the text from your item using text() (Qt Doc), then pass the text to QPlainTextEdit's appendPlainText(QString).

[JonB]

@Pl45m4
Since you've laid this out so neatly, may I suggest you add [&] to your Capture section, and note how it differs from [=]? Because some day someone's going to need it... :)

[Anonymous_Banned275]

@jsulm said in Please help with lambda sytax:

@AnneRanch said in Please help with lambda sytax:

function on_pushButton_11_clicked
@line 206

Can you show your on_pushButton_11_clicked? The crash is there at line 206.

There it is.

I have left in all the trace / debug stuff .
And highlighted the line 206

code// scan for nearby BT devices

void MainWindow_CAT_TAB::on_pushButton_11_clicked()
{
#ifdef TRACE
    qDebug() << "QDEBUG TRACE ";
    qDebug() << "QDEBUG TRACE TASK \n\t\t void MainWindow_CAT_TAB::on_pushButton_11_clicked()  \n";
     qDebug() << "QDEBUG TRACE TASK \n\t\t find nearby BT devices \n";
    qDebug() << "file     " << __FILE__;
    qDebug() << "function "<<__FUNCTION__;
    qDebug() << "@line    " << __LINE__;
    qDebug()<<"TEMPORARY EXIT ";
    //exit(99);
#endif
//   ui->listWidget_5->(" addItem(on_pushButton_11_clicked()");
//     ui->listWidget_5->(addItem(on_pushButton_11_clicked());
             ui->listWidget_5->addItem(" addItem(on_pushButton_11_clicked()");
             ui->listWidget_5->addItem(" addItem(on_pushButton_11_clicked()");
             ui->listWidget_5->addItem("information_main.count())");


#ifdef TRACE
    qDebug() << "QDEBUG TRACE ";
    qDebug() << "QDEBUG TRACE TASK \n\t\t START imoplement Device DiscoveryDialog  \n";
     qDebug() << "QDEBUG TRACE TASK \n\t\t find nearby BT devices \n";
    qDebug() << "file     " << __FILE__;
    qDebug() << "function "<<__FUNCTION__;
    **qDebug() << "@line    " << __LINE__;**
    qDebug()<<"TEMPORARY EXIT ";
    //exit(99);
#endif

// instatiate Devievce Discovery Dialog as in btscanner example
DeviceDiscoveryDialog *DDD = new DeviceDiscoveryDialog();

DDD->startScan();  // takes time 2 seconds for each device 

DDD->show();

#ifdef BYPASS
// test add connect here
connect(
            DDD->ui->list,
 //           SIGNAL(DDD->ui->list->itemChanged(TEST_LABEL)),
              SIGNAL(itemChanged(TEST_LABEL)),
            DDD->ui->plainTextEdit,
 //           SLOT(DDD->ui->plainTextEdit->appendPlainText(TEST_LABEL))
            SLOT(appendPlainText(TEST_LABEL))
        );
#endif


#ifdef TRACE
    qDebug() << "QDEBUG TRACE ";
    qDebug() << "QDEBUG TRACE TASK \n\t\t END imoplement Device DiscoiveryDialog  \n";
     qDebug() << "QDEBUG TRACE TASK \n\t\t find nearby BT devices \n";
    qDebug() << "file     " << __FILE__;
    qDebug() << "function "<<__FUNCTION__;
    qDebug() << "@line    " << __LINE__;
    qDebug()<<"TEMPORARY EXIT ";
    //exit(99);
#endif


}_text

[Christian Ehrlicher]

@AnneRanch said in Please help with lambda sytax:

SIGNAL(itemChanged(TEST_LABEL)),

And you really want to tell us that you read at least one sentence from what we're telling you here??

[Anonymous_Banned275]

Partial success.
Using both old and new "connect" style throws "segmentation fault" at either one.

It is my understanding that "connect" code placement is not critical - however my crash occurs exactly on "connect" which I have placed in a secondary dialog constructor. My main window dialog is primary.

RTFM implies that passing null pointer may be the problem...

[Anonymous_Banned275]

@AnneRanch DONE!
Ready to tackle lambda .
Moral of the story - stay on original issue - it was my shallow knowledge of "connect" , my wrong syntax and my implementation of "connect" - applied in wrong place.

Help from everybody assisting is very much appreciated.

[Pablo J. Rogina]

@AnneRanch said in Please help with lambda sytax:

@AnneRanch DONE!

great, so please don't forget to mark your post as solved!