Unsolved table.selectRow no doing anything
-
Hi,
I have an application using PyQt, which works fine on my end, but one user reports an issue I cannot reproduce.I have a tableview, where the user can click to open a separate dialog to edit the items. As a convenience shortcut, the user can press PgUp/PgDwn to apply the changes to the current row, go to the next row, and load the data of that next row in the editor.
My code goes something like this:
def page_up_down_edit(self, up_down): current_index = self.table.selectionModel().selectedRows()[0] current_row = self.table.selectionModel().selectedRows()[0].row() <process the changes> self.table.selectRow(current_row + shift) return
The problem is that for that particular user, the selectRow command does not seem to have done anything, because when this function is called next, the call to selectedRows returns None...
Any idea on how to solve this?
-
Hi and welcome to devnet,
The first thing to do:
- gather the full setup information from your user as:
-- PyQt version
-- Running OS (precise version)
-- Python version
-- How was your application installed
-- How was PyQt installed
Etc.
- gather the full setup information from your user as:
-
My user is on Windows 10.
I distribute the software using pyinstaller. The installer is made using Python 3.7.4 and PyQt5.15, running on Windows 10 with all the latest patches.
-
I've been doing some more debugging and theorising.
During during <process the changes>, what I actually do is unload a Qt database, run non-Qt database code from another library, and then reload the database in Qt.
Not sure if it's related, but when I try to remove the Qt database, I get this error:
QSqlDatabasePrivate::removeDatabase: connection 'qt_sql_default_connection' is still in use, all queries will cease to work.
However, I think I'm taking every precaution:
self.table.setModel(QtGui.QStandardItemModel()) del self.card_model # (The previous model for the table) self.card_model = None connection_name = self.qt_db.connectionName() self.qt_db.close() del self.qt_db QtSql.QSqlDatabase.removeDatabase(connection_name)
All my queries were also in local variables in other functions, so they should be out of scope at that point.
What am I doing wrong?
-
You are keeping a copy of a QSqlDatabase. Do not do that. QSqlDatabase handles that. You have a note in the documentation explaining why you get that message.
-
No longer stored qt_db as a class variable. Unloading code is changed to
self.table.setModel(QtGui.QStandardItemModel()) del self.card_model self.card_model = None QtSql.QSqlDatabase.removeDatabase(\ QtSql.QSqlDatabase.database().connectionName())
Does not help with the error message...
-
Then please provide a minimal runnable code example that shows the issue.
-
I've done some more debugging and it looks like the database stuff is a red herring. First of all, I have the same warnings on my machine, and they don't affect the row selection.
Also, I now had the user execute the following code after the database has been unloaded and reloaded, and the model and the table have been completely reinitialised from scratch:
def page_up_down_edit(self, up_down): <...database manipulation stuff...> self.table.selectRow(current_row + shift) QtWidgets.QMessageBox(text=f"Exit: selected_rows {current_row+shift} {self.table.selectionModel().selectedRows()}").exec_() return
This shows a dialog on his machine displaying "Exit: selected_rows 435 []". So, no row gets selected, even though that's exactly what the previous command should do....
-
Are you sure about the values of
current_row
andshift
? -
Yes, that's entirely expected.
I am destroying and recreating the model and the table from scratch inbetween, though. Could it be related to that in any way? Or does the selectRow statement take a while to get into effect?
-
Do you really need to destroy everything every time ?
-
Yes, because I need to release access to the Qt database, so I have to invalidate the model.
Meanwhile, I managed to get rid of a consistent 'qt_sql_default_connection' still in use' warning (I was still holding on to a variable containing the model), but that has had zero effect....
self.table.selectRow(current_row + shift) does not do anything in that place in my code (at least on my user's machine), and no error message gets written to the console either.
I tried all sorts of things, like rearranging my code, in the hope that I could work around this, but to no avail....
My guess is that there's a very subtle bug in Qt that causes this, but as it only happens on some machines and in a quite specific scenario that cannot be be reduced to a simple runnable test case, it will be very difficult to track down what's happening.
Unless people here have some brilliant insight or new things to try?
-
One thing you can do is to just clear the model content rather than replacing the whole model object.
What type of database are you using ?
-
It's an sqlite database.
I do this when I unload the Qt view of the database:
self.table.setModel(QtGui.QStandardItemModel()) del self.card_model self.card_model = None
And when I reload, I do
self.card_model = CardModel(component_manager=self.component_manager) self.card_model.setTable("cards") <...> self.table.setModel(self.card_model)
-
That looks pretty convoluted. Can you explain why you remove the connection ?
-
Because the backend library I use to process the necessary changes to the database is pure Python, so I need to release Qt's lock on the database first, have the Python library change the database, and then reload the database in Qt.
-
@PeterB74
I will say this then: if you are saying you are actually using non-Qt Python stuff to execute the database updates/access I wonder why you are also trying to useQSqlDatabase
at all? Maybe you should go via the Python level model? Closing and re-opening the connection/database/model is an "expensive" operation. Just a thought, I admit I don't know your full situation. -
I don't think replacing a fast C++ Qt direct database access with a slow Python wrapper is a good idea :-)
Updates to the database happen relatively infrequently, but scrolling through it and filtering is very common.
-
@PeterB74
And you think the time taken to process the data in-memory in C++ versus in Python outweighs the time taken to access the data in the database across the library/protocol?Anyway, best of luck.
-
The overhead of performing function calls in Python is very big because of the dynamical typing, and you need hundreds of calls to display a reasonable part of your table.
I tried it out, and scrolling becomes unbearingly slow... Accessing the database while staying in C is way more efficient than C calling Python which then calls C again.