Qt Quick vs Flutter
-
Thank you all.
So to sum up we can say that:
For desktop apps: Qt
For mobile apps: Flutter
For embedded programming: C & C++ (used in QtQuick for instance)are best choices for now to pick up.
Anyone disagree, please? -
@KroMignon said in Qt Quick vs Flutter:
@tomy said in Qt Quick vs Flutter:
QtC?
I think QtC ==> Qt Company :)
Yes, I have meant Qt Company.
-
-
@tomy said in Qt Quick vs Flutter:
@LeLev
Felgo, unlike Qt open-source, gives you almost nothing freely. :(
They have to eat something ;-)
Plus, then it comes to mobiles, Qt on iOS is not free anyway (and using LGPL on Android is tricky, too).
-
for me the decision is clear: I'll use Qt for mobile
have developed some very complex apps for customers out there running on thousands of devices
always mobile biz apps, running in-house
all my apps developed with QtQuickControls2 (QQC2) are very performantmy subjective personal POV: comparing flutter UI code and QML Code --> QML Code is much easier to read.
I never studied C or C++, developed 10+ years with Java
then with BlackBerry 10 / Cascades first time had to deal with Qt-C++ and it is really easy to understand
as BlackBerry faded away some years ago I started with Qt and QQC2 - UI in QML, biz logic, network, ... in C++Material style looks good on Android and iOS - my apps are running from lowcost-Android up to iPad 12.9 pro, in many cases together with Bluetooth devices (Scanner, Printer, eCards, waiter lock, ...)
It toom a while to understand QtCreator coming from so many years using Eclipse IDE, but finally I must say QtCreator is great for x-platform mobile development
upcoming Qt 6 with reduced QML 3 will provide an even more performant environment (QML automatically by magic compiled to C++) and better content assist while hacking code. I'll port all my apps to Qt 6 / QML3 and start a new blog series about, probably also working on a book Qt6-for-mobile later this year)
so if starting new I would give Qt a try
ekke ... Qt Champion 2016 | 2024 ... mobile business apps
5.15 --> 6.8 https://t1p.de/ekkeChecklist
QMake --> CMake https://t1p.de/ekkeCMakeMobileApps -
Great info, @ekkescorner , as always! Thanks for chiming in.
in many cases together with Bluetooth devices (Scanner, Printer, eCards, waiter lock, ...)
Lucky you. My experience with BT support so far was really bad, but it wasn't fully Qt's fault. All OSes treat BT differently, have different bugs etc. Maintaining an app with BLE support on Windows, Android, iOS, macOS is a real nightmare.
(Z(:^
-
Great info, @ekkescorner , as always! Thanks for chiming in.
in many cases together with Bluetooth devices (Scanner, Printer, eCards, waiter lock, ...)
Lucky you. My experience with BT support so far was really bad, but it wasn't fully Qt's fault. All OSes treat BT differently, have different bugs etc. Maintaining an app with BLE support on Windows, Android, iOS, macOS is a real nightmare.
@sierdzio yep - not so easy with BT on different platforms. have done this for Android and iOS. then a customer asks to support W10 tablets. I'm not a windows developer and managed it to work on W10, too. on macOS I've seen that some devices are working and others not. (Using macOS only while developing not in production)
I'm also doing BT Classic for Scanners and Printers on Android.
Luckily Qt provides this, too. Just implementing all the pieces. will blog later on this.Take a look at Flutter: different plugins for BLE and BT Classic from different developers. I really prefer to get this directly from Qt.
(yep - would be great to get more from Qt for mobile, but a big thanks for all the work on BT) -
for me the decision is clear: I'll use Qt for mobile
have developed some very complex apps for customers out there running on thousands of devices
always mobile biz apps, running in-house
all my apps developed with QtQuickControls2 (QQC2) are very performantmy subjective personal POV: comparing flutter UI code and QML Code --> QML Code is much easier to read.
I never studied C or C++, developed 10+ years with Java
then with BlackBerry 10 / Cascades first time had to deal with Qt-C++ and it is really easy to understand
as BlackBerry faded away some years ago I started with Qt and QQC2 - UI in QML, biz logic, network, ... in C++Material style looks good on Android and iOS - my apps are running from lowcost-Android up to iPad 12.9 pro, in many cases together with Bluetooth devices (Scanner, Printer, eCards, waiter lock, ...)
It toom a while to understand QtCreator coming from so many years using Eclipse IDE, but finally I must say QtCreator is great for x-platform mobile development
upcoming Qt 6 with reduced QML 3 will provide an even more performant environment (QML automatically by magic compiled to C++) and better content assist while hacking code. I'll port all my apps to Qt 6 / QML3 and start a new blog series about, probably also working on a book Qt6-for-mobile later this year)
so if starting new I would give Qt a try
QML Code is much easier to read.
So it's the important point you think Qt (for mobile) has compared to Flutter. I agree with that it has a great impact on app maintenance. I hope Qt company will pay more attention to mobile apps so that it has more words to say in this "mobilized" world against the bigger company backing Flutter, Google! :|
probably also working on a book Qt6-for-mobile later this year)
so if starting new I would give Qt a tryThat sounds awesome. Looking forward to seeing things from you. :)
If the person downloads the newest version of Qt, will he/she be able to use Qt 6 and QML 3 on it now, please?
-
QML Code is much easier to read.
So it's the important point you think Qt (for mobile) has compared to Flutter. I agree with that it has a great impact on app maintenance. I hope Qt company will pay more attention to mobile apps so that it has more words to say in this "mobilized" world against the bigger company backing Flutter, Google! :|
probably also working on a book Qt6-for-mobile later this year)
so if starting new I would give Qt a tryThat sounds awesome. Looking forward to seeing things from you. :)
If the person downloads the newest version of Qt, will he/she be able to use Qt 6 and QML 3 on it now, please?
@tomy said in Qt Quick vs Flutter:
So it's the important point you think Qt (for mobile) has compared to Flutter. I agree with that it has a great impact on app maintenance. I hope Qt company will pay more attention to mobile apps so that it has more words to say in this "mobilized" world against the bigger company backing Flutter, Google! :|
since Google/Alphabet stands behind flutter, chances are high that it will die/be unspported/ dropped in 1 - 2 years time, like 80% else made by google.
I'm joking, googles history speaks for itself.
If the person downloads the newest version of Qt, will he/she be able to use Qt 6 and QML 3 on it now, please?
Not as far as I know, maybe you can get a preview/alpha version once 5.15 is officially out.
-
QML Code is much easier to read.
So it's the important point you think Qt (for mobile) has compared to Flutter. I agree with that it has a great impact on app maintenance. I hope Qt company will pay more attention to mobile apps so that it has more words to say in this "mobilized" world against the bigger company backing Flutter, Google! :|
probably also working on a book Qt6-for-mobile later this year)
so if starting new I would give Qt a tryThat sounds awesome. Looking forward to seeing things from you. :)
If the person downloads the newest version of Qt, will he/she be able to use Qt 6 and QML 3 on it now, please?
@tomy the way from Qt 5 / QML2 to Qt 6 / QML3 will be a step-by-step process
Qt 6.0 is planned for Nov 2020 - I expect End of 2020 or first quarter 2021 ;-)
about Qt 6: https://www.qt.io/blog/2019/08/07/technical-vision-qt-6the process starts with Qt 5.15
many new things will be backported to 5.15
there will also be help from QtCreator to see what will be deprecated in Qt 6 / QML 3
hopefully this will work smootha first blog about new ways to go with QML in 5.15: https://www.qt.io/blog/qml-type-registration-in-qt-5.15
I'll try to follow this process and blog about and report issues to help Qt
have no idea how much work this will be and how easy / diffcult it will be to transform apps to Qt6 / QML3I have created some very complex apps and I know most of my own project rules won't work anymore
some years ago I started with Qt as a newbie - this was the time where first Betas of QtQuickControls2 came out.
I tried to use them, tested, blogged, requested features, added issues, ... - this was much work, but I got many of my issues/requests solved, so it was worth spending the time and motivates me to do the same with Qt6 QML3 for mobile apps -
Hello all,
Why do you think Qt Quick is better than Flutter for Android and iOS apps? What are the advantages and disadvantages of Qt Quick over Flutter for that area, please? How about apps for embedded devices by the two?
I did a research on the Web for the case but couldn't find a comprehensive and good answer.
Thanks beforehand.
@tomy I had a good experience with Qt for my first Android project, but I wouldn't use it again, primarily because of the licencing issue and I don't like the direction Qt is heading (all new modules are GPL instead of LGPL). And lately it seems the Qt Company doesn't care about mobile platforms.
When I started, there weren't many other cross-platform options. But now we have Flutter, React Native, and NativeScript, among others. I looked at Flutter and didn't like it. I don't like Dart and I don't like their UI markup. QML is the best UI markup language by far, IMO, and I will miss it.
Another consideration for me back then was that I needed OpenGL. I don't know if Flutter et al support 3D yet, so if I need 3D again I'll probably use a game engine like Godot.
But for my next 2D project I'm going to look at NativeScript. I guess now would be a good time to do that while I'm #SocialDistancing
-
@tomy I had a good experience with Qt for my first Android project, but I wouldn't use it again, primarily because of the licencing issue and I don't like the direction Qt is heading (all new modules are GPL instead of LGPL). And lately it seems the Qt Company doesn't care about mobile platforms.
When I started, there weren't many other cross-platform options. But now we have Flutter, React Native, and NativeScript, among others. I looked at Flutter and didn't like it. I don't like Dart and I don't like their UI markup. QML is the best UI markup language by far, IMO, and I will miss it.
Another consideration for me back then was that I needed OpenGL. I don't know if Flutter et al support 3D yet, so if I need 3D again I'll probably use a game engine like Godot.
But for my next 2D project I'm going to look at NativeScript. I guess now would be a good time to do that while I'm #SocialDistancing
@Tom_H you know that there will be a new startup / small biz offering coming for $499/year ?
-
@Tom_H you know that there will be a new startup / small biz offering coming for $499/year ?
@ekkescorner I did not know that. Good to know. I just got done reading the article you posted about Qt 6. Interesting read.
-
I've been working with Flatter/Dart and this is explanation of my experience:
-
Flatter is not the solution itself. It's only framework on Dart.
-
The Dart VM - is SUPER slow. Here the benchmark https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/fastest/dart-java.html There are fundamental issue in threads. The manner of threads - the reason of why it's so slow. There are not about percents, there are about times.
-
Extremely difficult in reality to add something native. You should be creating extensions to Dart VM on C++ In case of very restricted functionality for now - it's might be HUGE problem. (One question - if you need to add something on C++ to Dart, why Dart?) For now I would say - no any cross-platform 100% covering native. For me extremely important to be able to add native without troubles. Dart - is nothing about "without trouble".
-
SUPER poor community, a lot of noobs that will be copy-pasting official doc. Sometimes to find solution beside standard reference almost impossible or will get HUGE amount of time.
My own opinion: if you going to develop something very simple - Dart - might be solution, it's fast in developing and "idiot friendly" (BTW - if you look carefully on Dart itself, you might be seeing total paradigm compatibility to QML). The advantage of Flatter/Dart - very good implementation to Google services, it's in box from begin. If you going to develop something that require a little more then just getting JSON from server - definitely NO Dart at all. The promo of being "super fast UI" - is only if you using their precompiled UI components. In other case - super slow.
All of it my own experience of developing cross-platform applications. I've started cross-platform before mobile development based on Chromium Embedded https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromium_Embedded_Framework in 2012. We've been developing application based on WebUI for Windows and Linux. After it iOS native developing since iPhone 4, and now only Qt and sometimes native.
-
-
@tomy the new 'Small Business License' will help to make the right decision: https://www.qt.io/blog/available-now-qt-for-small-businesses
now up to 250K $ revenue - only 499$ p.a. -- embedded, mobile, desktop -- up to 4 devs -
I use Qt for Android on Play Store. I usually use JavaScript to develop QML apps. I had to search for an alternative for these reasons;
- The most important reason, app size is too much. Hello World QML app takes more than 40 MB on Android, APK size is 13 MB+. Qt copies all QML modules to APK's assets folder and it also copies some unused libraries to libs folder. This increases APK size.
- Basic things like updating, editing, saving a dynamic list model in QML-JS are tedious for me.
- Learning c++ with Qt takes time :)
- There is not officially mobile advertising platform support (I use an open source project for Qt and Admob)
- QML development is too slow. QML 1.0 made Nokia N9's (2011) component seems more advanced than QQC2 Material component
- License for commercial is very expensive for me.
I try to learn Flutter with an Udemy course. Flutter has more native looking interface compared to React Native and Native Script. Flutter has less app size compared to QML apps. It can also be developed for Web. Qt's Web Assembly is too slow compared to Flutter Web. Its license is more free than Qt so I can have commercial apps. I think Dart libraries will increase in the near future.
Qt supports c++ and many Javascript libraries. This makes it easy to develop complex apps with Qt. I will continue to develop my complex projects with Qt. I have simple QML apps that are almost 90MB on Play Store. I think to convert them to Flutter in order to reduce app size. I think to use Flutter for simple apps for now. -
I use Qt for Android on Play Store. I usually use JavaScript to develop QML apps. I had to search for an alternative for these reasons;
- The most important reason, app size is too much. Hello World QML app takes more than 40 MB on Android, APK size is 13 MB+. Qt copies all QML modules to APK's assets folder and it also copies some unused libraries to libs folder. This increases APK size.
- Basic things like updating, editing, saving a dynamic list model in QML-JS are tedious for me.
- Learning c++ with Qt takes time :)
- There is not officially mobile advertising platform support (I use an open source project for Qt and Admob)
- QML development is too slow. QML 1.0 made Nokia N9's (2011) component seems more advanced than QQC2 Material component
- License for commercial is very expensive for me.
I try to learn Flutter with an Udemy course. Flutter has more native looking interface compared to React Native and Native Script. Flutter has less app size compared to QML apps. It can also be developed for Web. Qt's Web Assembly is too slow compared to Flutter Web. Its license is more free than Qt so I can have commercial apps. I think Dart libraries will increase in the near future.
Qt supports c++ and many Javascript libraries. This makes it easy to develop complex apps with Qt. I will continue to develop my complex projects with Qt. I have simple QML apps that are almost 90MB on Play Store. I think to convert them to Flutter in order to reduce app size. I think to use Flutter for simple apps for now.Hello World QML app takes more than 40 MB on Android
There might be a problem, say, building the app using "Debug", with the case, otherwise it shouldn't be that much for such a trivial app.
I have a good but basic game (2D) created using QtQuick with many features like, images, sounds, DB and other items working very good on all android devices. It's only 21MB. :) -
Hello World QML app takes more than 40 MB on Android
There might be a problem, say, building the app using "Debug", with the case, otherwise it shouldn't be that much for such a trivial app.
I have a good but basic game (2D) created using QtQuick with many features like, images, sounds, DB and other items working very good on all android devices. It's only 21MB. :) -
@tomy I tested an empty project with release mode ARMv8, the APK was 10.8 MB, after installation it is 44.3 MB on device on Qt 13.0. I was wrong about 13MB :) Your game's APK is 21MB or it is the size after installation?
