QTimer with lambda functions

[mrjj]

@Mark81
Hi
I had to capture this in the [] for it to know the signal.

QTimer::singleShot(10, this, [this, idx] () {
        emit validationFailed(idx);
    });

notice the extra this in the [] besides idx

[Mark81]

I bet there is something "stupid"here like in the other thread :-)

[mrjj]

Hi
Hmm, it does look correct.
Can you try without the first "this" (the context)

    QTimer::singleShot(10,[this, idx] () {
        emit validationFailed(idx);
    });

and if that still complains, try a dummy to see if something with the surrounding code. like being in a switch.

    QTimer::singleShot(10,[] () { });

if it complains about this too, its something else.

it seems to complain about CustomDelegateOperators cant be converted to a QObject which is odd as
QStyledItemDelegate is.

[SGaist]

On side note, I would rather using something like:

QMetaObject::invokeMethod(this, "validationFailed", Qt::QueuedConnection, Q_ARG(QModelIndex, idx));

[Mark81]

@mrjj said in QTimer with lambda functions:

Can you try without the first "this" (the context)

HERE WE GO!!!!

This works!
But I'm honestly astonished about all these attempts! Please, don't misunderstand. I'm very grateful to you and all other guys, but I don't understand why there is so much confusion about the syntax!

[Mark81]

@SGaist said in QTimer with lambda functions:

On side note, I would rather using something like:

QMetaObject::invokeMethod(this, "validationFailed", Qt::QueuedConnection, Q_ARG(QModelIndex, idx));

Thanks but this doesn't compile LOL!
I'm going to stay with the other solution that apparently "fix" also the problem of the validation.

[SGaist]

Out of curiosity, what errors are you getting ?

[Mark81]

@SGaist said in QTimer with lambda functions:

Out of curiosity, what errors are you getting ?

[JonB]

@Mark81
I'm not a C++er, but since the only argument of type QObject* you are passing is your this as the first parameter, I assume it must be that your this is currently const and causes the error. You must be inside a function which is itself declared const, and hence this is const and unacceptable to QMetaObject::invokeMethod()?

You commented earlier that you found lambda syntax confusing, with which I whole-heartedly agree. They are a syntactic mess in many languages, especially C++ IMHO. I don't know, but you/others might like to peruse the little article https://medium.com/genymobile/how-c-lambda-expressions-can-improve-your-qt-code-8cd524f4ed9f I came across; whoever it's written by, it lays things out in a nice, big font!

[VRonin]

@Mark81 said in QTimer with lambda functions:

but I don't understand why there is so much confusion about the syntax!

The problem is that this is const inside setModelData. Not something easy to see. Exactly the same reason why QMetaObject::invokeMethod doesn't work.

I'm surprised the lambda version works without declaring the signal as const

[Mark81]

@VRonin said in QTimer with lambda functions:

I'm surprised the lambda version works without declaring the signal as const

As you can see in the first post the signal is actually const:

signals:
    void validationFailed(QModelIndex index) const;