How to restrict QSpinBox value to 1 to 100?

[Sriu1]

How to restrict a spinBox to not enter 0's?
@JonB

[JonB]

@Sriu1
If you really mean "I don't want to be able to type the 0 character physically into the box", then as @SGaist says that would mean your user could not enter, say, 10. Which seems like an unlikely requirement.

[KillerSmath]

I think he want to set a validate on spinbox to avoid invalid number on view, so,
probably we want to implement a regExp like [1-9][0-9][0-9]

[JonB]

@KillerSmath
How would your regexp allow a value like, say, 23? How would it prevent, say, 999?

[J.Hilk]

I have the feeling, we had this question recently 🤔

@Sriu1
if you really want to restrict the input of leading 0's you probably will have to do this yourself by, for example, overwriting QAbstractSpinBox::validate

[JonB]

@J.Hilk
A while back I posted (https://forum.qt.io/topic/85305/validation-behaviour-too-confusing-for-end-user) how I feel so unfamiliar about the way Qt validators work when typing into a line edit, which would apply to a spin box's edit too.

For example, if your validator does indeed forbid a leading 0:

1. Type a 6.
2. Type a 0.
3. You realize you meant 50 rather than 60.
4. So you try to delete the leading 6, to then type in a 5.
5. But you can't! As you delete the leading 6, the number now starts with a 0, so the validator prevents the delete. The user gets no feedback as to why.
6. To achieve the change, the user must first delete the 0, followed by the 6, before he can then type in 50.

This is most unnatural, and regrettably my users are so confused I had to remove the validator.... So OP beware!

[KillerSmath]

@JonB said in How to restrict QSpinBox value to 1 to 100?:

@KillerSmath
How would your regexp allow a value like, say, 23? How would it prevent, say, 999?

I just said a hypothetical example.

[JonB]

@KillerSmath
Oh, OK, some posters here will type in whatever you offer and then complain if it doesn't work as-is!

[KillerSmath]

@JonB said in How to restrict QSpinBox value to 1 to 100?:

@KillerSmath
Oh, OK, some posters here will type in whatever you offer and then complain if it doesn't work as-is!

an easy mode to write this regular expression is 0|100|[1-9][0-9]?

[JonB]

@KillerSmath
Yep. For completeness, since the OP states he wants to disallow 0, if he wants to copy this it should be 100|[1-9][0-9]?.

[KillerSmath]

@JonB said in How to restrict QSpinBox value to 1 to 100?:

@KillerSmath
Yep. For completeness, since the OP states he wants to disallow 0, if he wants to copy this it should be 100|[1-9][0-9]?.

Yep, thank you, i forgot this part. xD

[SGaist]

To be correct: ^[1-9][0-9]?$|^100$. Otherwise you'll be matching "numbers in numbers"

[KillerSmath]

@SGaist said in How to restrict QSpinBox value to 1 to 100?:

To be correct: ^[1-9][0-9]?$|^100$. Otherwise you'll be matching "numbers in numbers"

Yes, use the delimiters to apply this regular expression on full string.

[JonB]

@SGaist

To be correct: ^[1-9][0-9]?$|^100$. Otherwise you'll be matching "numbers in numbers"

But for QAbstractSpinBox::validate() I assume it uses http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qregularexpressionvalidator.html#details, which states:

QRegularExpressionValidator automatically wraps the regular expression in the \A and \z anchors; in other words, it always attempts to do an exact match.

?

[KillerSmath]

@JonB said in How to restrict QSpinBox value to 1 to 100?:

@SGaist

To be correct: ^[1-9][0-9]?$|^100$. Otherwise you'll be matching "numbers in numbers"

But for QAbstractSpinBox::validate() I assume it uses http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qregularexpressionvalidator.html#details, which states:

QRegularExpressionValidator automatically wraps the regular expression in the \A and \z anchors; in other words, it always attempts to do an exact match.

?

Yes, i found the Qt reposity and i noticed QAbstractSpinBox::validate() returns for default QValidator::Acceptable without verification.

if the input is not validated to QValidator::Acceptable when Return is pressed or interpretText() is called.

QAbstractSpinBox.cpp Repository

[JonB]

@KillerSmath
Not sure your comment is against what I meant?
I was asking @SGaist why it is necessary to put in his ^ & $ in the reg exp given that the docs for http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qregularexpressionvalidator.html#details (seem to me to) state that it will do full match anyway? Unless QAbstractSpinBox::validate() does not use QRegularExpressionValidator ?

[SGaist]

@JonB That was for direct QRegularExpression use.