Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. General talk
  3. Brainstorm
  4. need ideas for list/table implementation
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

need ideas for list/table implementation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Brainstorm
57 Posts 5 Posters 18.7k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mzimmersM Offline
    mzimmersM Offline
    mzimmers
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    Hmm...it's not working. I read this in the QThread page:

    This function [quit] does nothing if the thread does not have an event loop.

    Do I need to explicitly declare/start an event loop?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • VRoninV Offline
      VRoninV Offline
      VRonin
      wrote on last edited by VRonin
      #41

      If you don't subclass QThread the native QThread::run starts an event loop. Can you show us your current Worker::process implementation?

      "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
      ~Napoleon Bonaparte

      On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mzimmersM Offline
        mzimmersM Offline
        mzimmers
        wrote on last edited by
        #42

        Sure:

        void Worker::process()
        {
            int len;
        //    running.ref(); // set to value of 1
        //    while (true)
        //    {
                len = sm.recv(buffIn, sizeof(buffIn));
                if (len >= 0)
                {
                    buffIn[len] = '\0';
                    Message msg(nullptr, buffIn);
                    emit(newMessage(&msg));
        
                    // if message is a heartbeat, send an ack.
                    if (msg.getType() == MSG_HEARTBEAT)
                    {
                        sendHeartbeatAck();
                        updateDeviceTable(msg);
                    }
                }
                else
                {
                    SocketState ss = sm.getSocketState();
                    if (ss == SOCKET_DISCONNECTED)
                    {
                        //sm.init();
                    }
                }
        //        Sleep(10);
        //    }
            //emit reachedEndOfThread();
        }
        
        
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • VRoninV Offline
          VRoninV Offline
          VRonin
          wrote on last edited by VRonin
          #43

          emit newMessage(&msg) is a race condition, msg might (and almost surely does) go out of scope before the slots connected to the signal can use the argument

          "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
          ~Napoleon Bonaparte

          On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mzimmersM Offline
            mzimmersM Offline
            mzimmers
            wrote on last edited by
            #44

            Noted, but I don't think that's causing my quit button to be ignored, is it?

            I just realized my process() routine is only called once. Is there something wrong with my pollTimer?

            Worker::Worker(QObject *parent) : QObject (parent), devices(parent), pollTimer(this)
            {
                QObject::connect(&pollTimer, &QTimer::timeout, this, &Worker::process);
                pollTimer.setInterval(100);
            }
            void Worker::start()
            {
                pollTimer.start();
            }
            
            kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • VRoninV Offline
              VRoninV Offline
              VRonin
              wrote on last edited by VRonin
              #45

              This is weird... can you post the entire worker.h and worker.cpp?

              Hmm...it's not working.

              How are you testing if it's working or not?

              P.S.
              No need to give parents to stack-allocated QObjects like devices or pollTimer
              edit: wrong in this case, without a parent the objects will belong to the thread calling Worker constructor and not be moved with it

              "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
              ~Napoleon Bonaparte

              On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

              kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mzimmersM Offline
                mzimmersM Offline
                mzimmers
                wrote on last edited by
                #46

                worker.h:

                #ifndef WORKER_H
                #define WORKER_H
                
                #include "winsock2.h"
                #include "ws2tcpip.h"
                
                #include <QAtomicInt>
                #include <QObject>
                //#include <QThread>
                #include <QTimer>
                
                #include "constants.h"
                #include "devices.h"
                #include "message.h"
                #include "socket.h"
                
                namespace Ui
                {
                class Widget;
                }
                
                class Worker : public QObject //QThread
                {
                    Q_OBJECT
                
                private:
                    SOCKET sock;
                    SocketMC sm;
                    int myErrno;
                    Message msg;
                    char msgOut[1024];
                    char buffIn[1024];
                    Devices devices;
                    QTimer pollTimer;
                
                    void sendHeartbeatAck();
                    void updateDeviceTable(Message msg);
                public:
                    explicit Worker(QObject *parent = nullptr);
                    ~Worker();
                    void readSocket();
                    void doQuit();
                signals:
                    void newMessage(Message *msg);
                    void finished();
                //    void reachedEndOfThread(int rc = 0);
                
                public slots:
                    void start();
                    void process();
                    void sendLedPatternChange(LedPattern newState);
                    void sendLedBrightnessChange(int value);
                    void sendScanRequest();
                };
                
                #endif // WORKER_H
                

                worker.cpp:

                #include <iostream>
                #include <string>
                #include <stdio.h>
                
                #include <QDateTime>
                
                #include "constants.h"
                #include "message.h"
                #include "worker.h"
                
                using namespace std;
                
                Worker::Worker(QObject *parent) : QObject (parent), devices(parent), pollTimer(this)
                {
                    DeviceDetails dev;
                
                //    dev.macAddr = "macaddr2";
                //    dev.devName = "devname22";
                //    dev.latestHB = "hbtime222";
                //    devices.update(dev);
                
                //    dev.macAddr = "macaddr55";
                //    dev.devName = "devname55";
                //    dev.latestHB = "hbtime55";
                //    devices.update(dev);
                
                    QObject::connect(&pollTimer, &QTimer::timeout, this, &Worker::process);
                    pollTimer.setInterval(100);
                }
                Worker::~Worker()
                {
                }
                void Worker::doQuit()
                {
                //    running.deref(); // set to value of 0.
                    emit finished();
                }
                
                void Worker::start()
                {
                    pollTimer.start();
                }
                
                void Worker::sendLedPatternChange(LedPattern newState)
                {
                    Message msg;
                
                    msg.add(msgTags[TAGENUM_PRODUCT], PRODUCT_NAME);
                    msg.add(msgTags[TAGENUM_PACKETTYPE], msgtypeText[MSG_LED_SET_PATTERN]);
                    msg.add(msgTags[TAGENUM_NEWPATTERN], ledPatternText[newState]);
                
                    sm.send(msg.encodeXml());
                }
                void Worker::sendLedBrightnessChange(int value)
                {
                    Message msg;
                    string s;
                
                    s = std::to_string(value);
                    msg.add(msgTags[TAGENUM_PRODUCT], PRODUCT_NAME);
                    msg.add(msgTags[TAGENUM_PACKETTYPE], msgtypeText[MSG_LED_SET_BRIGHTNESS]);
                    msg.add(msgTags[TAGENUM_NEWBRIGHTNESS], s);
                
                    sm.send(msg.encodeXml());
                }
                
                void Worker::sendHeartbeatAck()
                {
                    Message msg;
                    msg.add(msgTags[TAGENUM_PRODUCT], PRODUCT_NAME);
                    msg.add(msgTags[TAGENUM_PACKETTYPE], msgtypeText[MSG_HEARTBEAT_ACK]);
                
                    sm.send(msg.encodeXml());
                }
                
                void Worker::updateDeviceTable(Message msg)
                {
                    DeviceDetails dev;
                    dev.macAddr = QString::fromStdString(msg.getValue(msgTags[TAGENUM_MACADDRESS]));
                    dev.devName = QString::fromStdString(msg.getValue(msgTags[TAGENUM_DEVICENAME]));
                    dev.latestHB = QDateTime::currentDateTimeUtc().toString(QString::fromStdString(timestampFormat));
                
                    devices.update(dev);
                }
                void Worker::sendScanRequest(void)
                {
                    Message msg;
                    msg.add(msgTags[TAGENUM_PRODUCT], PRODUCT_NAME);
                    msg.add(msgTags[TAGENUM_PACKETTYPE], msgtypeText[MSG_SCAN_REQUEST]);
                
                    sm.send(msg.encodeXml());
                }
                void Worker::process()
                {
                    cout << "worker::process() started." << endl;
                    int len;
                //    running.ref(); // set to value of 1
                //    while (true)
                //    {
                        len = sm.recv(buffIn, sizeof(buffIn));
                        if (len >= 0)
                        {
                            buffIn[len] = '\0';
                            msg.decodeXml(buffIn);
                            emit(newMessage(&msg));
                
                            // if message is a heartbeat, send an ack.
                            if (msg.getType() == MSG_HEARTBEAT)
                            {
                                sendHeartbeatAck();
                                updateDeviceTable(msg);
                            }
                        }
                        else
                        {
                            SocketState ss = sm.getSocketState();
                            if (ss == SOCKET_DISCONNECTED)
                            {
                                //sm.init();
                            }
                        }
                //        Sleep(10);
                //    }
                    //emit reachedEndOfThread();
                }
                

                The test for whether the exit works is if the window disappears, and the debugger exits. It doesn't. The test for how often process() is called is the cout at the top of the routine.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mzimmersM mzimmers

                  Noted, but I don't think that's causing my quit button to be ignored, is it?

                  I just realized my process() routine is only called once. Is there something wrong with my pollTimer?

                  Worker::Worker(QObject *parent) : QObject (parent), devices(parent), pollTimer(this)
                  {
                      QObject::connect(&pollTimer, &QTimer::timeout, this, &Worker::process);
                      pollTimer.setInterval(100);
                  }
                  void Worker::start()
                  {
                      pollTimer.start();
                  }
                  
                  kshegunovK Offline
                  kshegunovK Offline
                  kshegunov
                  Moderators
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #47

                  @mzimmers said in need ideas for list/table implementation:

                  Noted, but I don't think that's causing my quit button to be ignored, is it?

                  Probably not, although it would eventually cause a segafault somewhere.

                  I just realized my process() routine is only called once. Is there something wrong with my pollTimer?

                  Not that I can see. Are you sure this:

                  len = sm.recv(buffIn, sizeof(buffIn));
                  

                  isn't blocking? (also the reason for my question why aren't you using Qt's sockets)

                  Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • VRoninV VRonin

                    This is weird... can you post the entire worker.h and worker.cpp?

                    Hmm...it's not working.

                    How are you testing if it's working or not?

                    P.S.
                    No need to give parents to stack-allocated QObjects like devices or pollTimer
                    edit: wrong in this case, without a parent the objects will belong to the thread calling Worker constructor and not be moved with it

                    kshegunovK Offline
                    kshegunovK Offline
                    kshegunov
                    Moderators
                    wrote on last edited by kshegunov
                    #48

                    @VRonin said in need ideas for list/table implementation:

                    No need to give parents to stack-allocated QObjects like devices or pollTimer

                    That is incorrect! It's quite needed.

                    Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • mzimmersM Offline
                      mzimmersM Offline
                      mzimmers
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #49

                      The socket call might block, but only for a few seconds. I just stepped through the code, and discovered that worker::start() is never called. In main, I have:

                          worker->moveToThread(thread);
                           ...
                          thread->start();
                      

                      Am I supposed to explicitly call worker::start()?

                      No good reason for using native sockets; I'm just re-using code that I implemented on the target device (which sadly doesn't have Qt [yet]). But I'm fairly sure they're not the problem here. Remember this was (sort of) working once, before VRonin MOG'd me and I started making changes.

                      kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mzimmersM mzimmers

                        The socket call might block, but only for a few seconds. I just stepped through the code, and discovered that worker::start() is never called. In main, I have:

                            worker->moveToThread(thread);
                             ...
                            thread->start();
                        

                        Am I supposed to explicitly call worker::start()?

                        No good reason for using native sockets; I'm just re-using code that I implemented on the target device (which sadly doesn't have Qt [yet]). But I'm fairly sure they're not the problem here. Remember this was (sort of) working once, before VRonin MOG'd me and I started making changes.

                        kshegunovK Offline
                        kshegunovK Offline
                        kshegunov
                        Moderators
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #50

                        Am I supposed to explicitly call worker::start()?

                        No, not really. Do you have that:

                        QObject::connect(thread, &QThread::started, worker, &Worker::start);
                        

                        before calling thread->start();?

                        Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • mzimmersM Offline
                          mzimmersM Offline
                          mzimmers
                          wrote on last edited by mzimmers
                          #51

                          Well, I didn't (the slot was process, not start), but I do now...same result.

                          Is there a way to see whether this slot is actually getting invoked:

                              QObject::connect(&widget, &Widget::quitButtonPushed, thread, &QThread::quit);
                          

                          I have verified the signal in the debugger.

                          EDIT:

                          Wait a minute: I just realized I'm doing this a little differently than I have in the past, in that the worker, not the widget is in the new thread. I think maybe I am exiting the worker, but I still have to stop the main/widget thread. Since main() isn't a Qt object, I can't use connect, so what's the recommended technique here?

                          kshegunovK 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • mzimmersM mzimmers

                            Well, I didn't (the slot was process, not start), but I do now...same result.

                            Is there a way to see whether this slot is actually getting invoked:

                                QObject::connect(&widget, &Widget::quitButtonPushed, thread, &QThread::quit);
                            

                            I have verified the signal in the debugger.

                            EDIT:

                            Wait a minute: I just realized I'm doing this a little differently than I have in the past, in that the worker, not the widget is in the new thread. I think maybe I am exiting the worker, but I still have to stop the main/widget thread. Since main() isn't a Qt object, I can't use connect, so what's the recommended technique here?

                            kshegunovK Offline
                            kshegunovK Offline
                            kshegunov
                            Moderators
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #52

                            @mzimmers said in need ideas for list/table implementation:

                            Is there a way to see whether this slot is actually getting invoked:

                            Subclass QThread for the testing purposes and override run(). In the run implementation only do:

                            void MyThread::run()
                            {
                                int ret = QThread::exec();
                                qDebug() << "ret"; //< If you get to here with the debugger, then the `quit` was called.
                            }
                            

                            Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mzimmersM mzimmers

                              Well, I didn't (the slot was process, not start), but I do now...same result.

                              Is there a way to see whether this slot is actually getting invoked:

                                  QObject::connect(&widget, &Widget::quitButtonPushed, thread, &QThread::quit);
                              

                              I have verified the signal in the debugger.

                              EDIT:

                              Wait a minute: I just realized I'm doing this a little differently than I have in the past, in that the worker, not the widget is in the new thread. I think maybe I am exiting the worker, but I still have to stop the main/widget thread. Since main() isn't a Qt object, I can't use connect, so what's the recommended technique here?

                              kshegunovK Offline
                              kshegunovK Offline
                              kshegunov
                              Moderators
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #53

                              @mzimmers said in need ideas for list/table implementation:

                              Wait a minute: I just realized I'm doing this a little differently than I have in the past, in that the worker, not the widget is in the new thread. I think maybe I am exiting the worker, but I still have to stop the main/widget thread. Since main() isn't a Qt object, I can't use connect, so what's the recommended technique here?

                              You have QApplication for that purpose and you can get it from anywhere with QCoreApplication::instance(). Connect the quit button to the application quit slot as well as to the thread quit slot. Don't forget to wait for the worker thread to finish (call QThread::wait) before exiting the application.

                              Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                              mzimmersM 1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • VRoninV Offline
                                VRoninV Offline
                                VRonin
                                wrote on last edited by VRonin
                                #54

                                emit newMessage(&msg) is (probably) still a race condition, msg.decodeXml might (and almost surely does) get called before the slots connected to the signal had the time to read the last one. Either serialise access inside Message via stuff like QReadWriteLock or emit passing by value

                                "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
                                ~Napoleon Bonaparte

                                On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • kshegunovK kshegunov

                                  @mzimmers said in need ideas for list/table implementation:

                                  Wait a minute: I just realized I'm doing this a little differently than I have in the past, in that the worker, not the widget is in the new thread. I think maybe I am exiting the worker, but I still have to stop the main/widget thread. Since main() isn't a Qt object, I can't use connect, so what's the recommended technique here?

                                  You have QApplication for that purpose and you can get it from anywhere with QCoreApplication::instance(). Connect the quit button to the application quit slot as well as to the thread quit slot. Don't forget to wait for the worker thread to finish (call QThread::wait) before exiting the application.

                                  mzimmersM Offline
                                  mzimmersM Offline
                                  mzimmers
                                  wrote on last edited by mzimmers
                                  #55

                                  @kshegunov so my exit button now triggers two calls:

                                      QApplication a(argc, argv);
                                      Widget widget;
                                      QThread* thread = new QThread;
                                    ...
                                      QObject::connect(&widget, &Widget::quitButtonPushed, thread, &QThread::quit);
                                      QObject::connect(&widget, &Widget::quitButtonPushed, &a, &QApplication::quit);
                                  

                                  Regarding QThread::wait(), according to the docs:

                                  Blocks the thread until either of these conditions is met

                                  (where one of the conditions is the thread finishes)

                                  So, presumably, what documentation means is that the routine blocks the deletion of the thread, not the thread itself, right? So I can call the wait() routine like this?

                                      widget.show();
                                      thread->start();
                                      thread->wait();
                                      rc = a.exec();
                                  

                                  EDIT:

                                  wrong.

                                  OK, so where should the thread wait call go?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • VRoninV Offline
                                    VRoninV Offline
                                    VRonin
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #56

                                    You can connect &QThread::finished insetad of &Widget::quitButtonPushed to &QApplication::quit for the application to wait for the thread to finish before closing down

                                    "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
                                    ~Napoleon Bonaparte

                                    On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • mzimmersM Offline
                                      mzimmersM Offline
                                      mzimmers
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #57

                                      Perfect. Thanks for the help on threads.

                                      And speaking of threads, this one has gone afield enough that I think it's best to consider it finished. Thanks to everyone who provided input on this.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0

                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups
                                      • Search
                                      • Get Qt Extensions
                                      • Unsolved