Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. Qt Creator and other tools
  4. set<int> in Qt creator and debugger
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

set<int> in Qt creator and debugger

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Qt Creator and other tools
creator 4.2.1windows 10 iotsetintmingwbug-17653
29 Posts 3 Posters 13.0k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K koahnig

    @mrjj
    No, I simply used the maintenance tool and used the second entry (updating/upgrading?).
    Therefore, there could be also some updates invloved for the other tools. I did not pay attention, but it is probably save to assume that the installation for Qt5.4.2 stayed as it was.

    mrjjM Offline
    mrjjM Offline
    mrjj
    Lifetime Qt Champion
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @koahnig
    Hi i used the update option and updated ONLY Creator.
    ( and some docs that was not de-selectable)

    And i have issue now
    alt text

    So it seems a bug in 4.2.1 .

    Soo where is my downgrade option ? :)

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • mrjjM mrjj

      @koahnig
      Hi i used the update option and updated ONLY Creator.
      ( and some docs that was not de-selectable)

      And i have issue now
      alt text

      So it seems a bug in 4.2.1 .

      Soo where is my downgrade option ? :)

      K Offline
      K Offline
      koahnig
      wrote on last edited by
      #20

      @mrjj

      Bad luck, I guess. ;)

      At least I know that this is not an issue with my specific machine.

      Somehow it would be good to have parallel installations of Qt creator as well. However, the implications might be huge.

      Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

      mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K koahnig

        @mrjj

        Bad luck, I guess. ;)

        At least I know that this is not an issue with my specific machine.

        Somehow it would be good to have parallel installations of Qt creator as well. However, the implications might be huge.

        mrjjM Offline
        mrjjM Offline
        mrjj
        Lifetime Qt Champion
        wrote on last edited by
        #21

        @koahnig
        Its really reproducible.
        Just tried in virtual. Same result.

        In theory , there should be nothing stopping us from having multiple Creators but
        i wonder if a 3.6 version can load the plugins of 4.2.1

        K 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mrjjM mrjj

          @koahnig
          Its really reproducible.
          Just tried in virtual. Same result.

          In theory , there should be nothing stopping us from having multiple Creators but
          i wonder if a 3.6 version can load the plugins of 4.2.1

          K Offline
          K Offline
          koahnig
          wrote on last edited by
          #22

          @mrjj

          I doubt that creator 3.6 can load plugins of version 4.2.1.

          I had wasted a while ago my time with enhancing the doxygen plugin. My rational was that at least I can use while doing a complete compilation of creator with all plugins. However, I had found out that another plugin, which I was relying on, changed interface. Adding the mostly non-existing documentation for feaures and interfaces completes in my opinion the nightmare.

          Do you know if you can use plugins the other way around (e.g. 3.6 plugins in 4.2)?
          Respectively, can you mix MinGW plugins with VS plugins?
          The latter one is probably killed by incompatibility of different compilers, or is that assumption wrong?

          Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

          mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K koahnig

            @mrjj

            I doubt that creator 3.6 can load plugins of version 4.2.1.

            I had wasted a while ago my time with enhancing the doxygen plugin. My rational was that at least I can use while doing a complete compilation of creator with all plugins. However, I had found out that another plugin, which I was relying on, changed interface. Adding the mostly non-existing documentation for feaures and interfaces completes in my opinion the nightmare.

            Do you know if you can use plugins the other way around (e.g. 3.6 plugins in 4.2)?
            Respectively, can you mix MinGW plugins with VS plugins?
            The latter one is probably killed by incompatibility of different compilers, or is that assumption wrong?

            mrjjM Offline
            mrjjM Offline
            mrjj
            Lifetime Qt Champion
            wrote on last edited by
            #23

            @koahnig
            yes i assume only minor version will work.
            I have 2 creators installed currently. seems to work.
            Im not sure how compatible the plugins are but going to try an older creator:)

            We cannot use mingw plugins unless creator is compiled with mingw. I made such version to make
            testing Designer plugins easier. but to run in the normal creator it must be compiled with vs 2013 or 2015 for 5.8

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Offline
              K Offline
              koahnig
              wrote on last edited by
              #24

              I am wondering if this has something to do with the debugging problems?
              0_1485853394828_upload-12d41ddf-a50c-4398-a830-be85302d58b5

              I am pretty sure that the settings where ok prior to creator update.

              Also this looks strange
              0_1485853551174_upload-d74f8f2c-6ed3-46fe-b244-ccb57ea6b692

              Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

              mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K koahnig

                I am wondering if this has something to do with the debugging problems?
                0_1485853394828_upload-12d41ddf-a50c-4398-a830-be85302d58b5

                I am pretty sure that the settings where ok prior to creator update.

                Also this looks strange
                0_1485853551174_upload-d74f8f2c-6ed3-46fe-b244-ccb57ea6b692

                mrjjM Offline
                mrjjM Offline
                mrjj
                Lifetime Qt Champion
                wrote on last edited by
                #25

                @koahnig
                Image upload is broken :)

                K 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mrjjM mrjj

                  @koahnig
                  Image upload is broken :)

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  koahnig
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #26

                  @mrjj

                  Here are the links first pciture
                  Second picture
                  Is my handling wrong or is it a general issue with the upload?

                  Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

                  mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K koahnig

                    @mrjj

                    Here are the links first pciture
                    Second picture
                    Is my handling wrong or is it a general issue with the upload?

                    mrjjM Offline
                    mrjjM Offline
                    mrjj
                    Lifetime Qt Champion
                    wrote on last edited by mrjj
                    #27

                    @koahnig
                    Its general issue. The image is in fact uploaded to cloud server but sadly that area is only
                    available to the users on that Host. So it remains visible for some time to the poster and "some"
                    and then its gone.

                    K 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mrjjM mrjj

                      @koahnig
                      Its general issue. The image is in fact uploaded to cloud server but sadly that area is only
                      available to the users on that Host. So it remains visible for some time to the poster and "some"
                      and then its gone.

                      K Offline
                      K Offline
                      koahnig
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #28

                      @mrjj

                      If I undertand you correctly I would need to install a previous version of Qt creator separately through creator install.exe. Are you aware of any downsides when you are downgrading from the buggy version?
                      E.g. are there conflicts through the various files holding settings?

                      As noted before, I am not really happy to downgrade of potential version conflicts, but as it looks to me, it might be the best alternative. I need to debug structures based on std::map now. The same problem there. Probably not surprising I guess.

                      Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

                      kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K koahnig

                        @mrjj

                        If I undertand you correctly I would need to install a previous version of Qt creator separately through creator install.exe. Are you aware of any downsides when you are downgrading from the buggy version?
                        E.g. are there conflicts through the various files holding settings?

                        As noted before, I am not really happy to downgrade of potential version conflicts, but as it looks to me, it might be the best alternative. I need to debug structures based on std::map now. The same problem there. Probably not surprising I guess.

                        kshegunovK Offline
                        kshegunovK Offline
                        kshegunov
                        Moderators
                        wrote on last edited by kshegunov
                        #29

                        @koahnig said in set<int> in Qt creator and debugger:

                        E.g. are there conflicts through the various files holding settings?

                        There might be, you will probably at least need to reconfigure the project's kits (i.e. deleting the *.pro.user files). I'd try to load them directly first though, it might work fine.

                        @koahnig said in set<int> in Qt creator and debugger:

                        The same problem there.

                        It's the same data structure, so no surprise at all, indeed.

                        Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1

                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups
                        • Search
                        • Get Qt Extensions
                        • Unsolved