Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. Qt MinGW 64-bit

Qt MinGW 64-bit

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved General and Desktop
mingw64-bit
15 Posts 6 Posters 6.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    satysin
    wrote on 14 Jan 2017, 19:47 last edited by
    #3

    @koahnig

    Thank you for the warm welcome :)

    Yeah I am using the 32-bit build which is fine for now but I just found it a little strange that in 2017 they still don't provide an official 64-bit build for MinGW when they do for MSVC.

    Would be great if Digia could provide one in the future, perhaps for Qt 5.8?

    K 1 Reply Last reply 14 Jan 2017, 19:56
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      mrjj
      Lifetime Qt Champion
      wrote on 14 Jan 2017, 19:53 last edited by mrjj
      #4

      well they also stopped making a 32 bit linux. It all depends on download stats
      etc and the huge cost of making pre-compiled.

      mingw is always treated a bit as the stepchild (from all)
      as most projects is using visual studio and its de facto standard for windows development.
      Also the new web engine stuff is NOT supported in mingw.

      So it makes more sense to focus on 32/64 for VS for PRO development and
      mingw for the more casual and works out of the box experience.

      But yes, it might come. Like 32 out and only 64 bit.
      Most new windows are 64 bit and xp is finally dying.

      S 1 Reply Last reply 14 Jan 2017, 20:00
      1
      • S satysin
        14 Jan 2017, 19:47

        @koahnig

        Thank you for the warm welcome :)

        Yeah I am using the 32-bit build which is fine for now but I just found it a little strange that in 2017 they still don't provide an official 64-bit build for MinGW when they do for MSVC.

        Would be great if Digia could provide one in the future, perhaps for Qt 5.8?

        K Offline
        K Offline
        koahnig
        wrote on 14 Jan 2017, 19:56 last edited by
        #5

        @satysin

        I do not know anything about the release plans for a 64 bit version.
        I believe the choices for 64 bits are too many. I think there has been an extended discussion in the past.

        From development point I was not convinced that it is a good idea to continue with 64 bit MinGW version. I was a bit surprised when I had noticed that at that time it was slower especially when debugging. However, that have been because of machine limitations. The debug versions were relatively large. Presumably I could tweak the parameters for speeding up. Anyway, as long as I do not see a real need, it does not make sense to switch for me.

        Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • M mrjj
          14 Jan 2017, 19:53

          well they also stopped making a 32 bit linux. It all depends on download stats
          etc and the huge cost of making pre-compiled.

          mingw is always treated a bit as the stepchild (from all)
          as most projects is using visual studio and its de facto standard for windows development.
          Also the new web engine stuff is NOT supported in mingw.

          So it makes more sense to focus on 32/64 for VS for PRO development and
          mingw for the more casual and works out of the box experience.

          But yes, it might come. Like 32 out and only 64 bit.
          Most new windows are 64 bit and xp is finally dying.

          S Offline
          S Offline
          satysin
          wrote on 14 Jan 2017, 20:00 last edited by
          #6

          @mrjj Yes I guess I should just go with MSVC then. I have Visual Studio 2017 RC installed but currently the Qt installer does not detect it, I assume this is because they do not have a Qt build for it yet.

          M K 2 Replies Last reply 14 Jan 2017, 20:03
          0
          • S satysin
            14 Jan 2017, 20:00

            @mrjj Yes I guess I should just go with MSVC then. I have Visual Studio 2017 RC installed but currently the Qt installer does not detect it, I assume this is because they do not have a Qt build for it yet.

            M Offline
            M Offline
            mrjj
            Lifetime Qt Champion
            wrote on 14 Jan 2017, 20:03 last edited by mrjj
            #7

            @satysin

            Yes. The Qt must match the VS version. ( due to DLL loading)
            I think VS2015 is the newest. ( didnt check)

            Its not very hard to compile qt with minge 64 but it does take long time.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • S satysin
              14 Jan 2017, 20:00

              @mrjj Yes I guess I should just go with MSVC then. I have Visual Studio 2017 RC installed but currently the Qt installer does not detect it, I assume this is because they do not have a Qt build for it yet.

              K Offline
              K Offline
              koahnig
              wrote on 14 Jan 2017, 20:04 last edited by
              #8

              @satysin

              When go MSVC, make sure that can install a compatible, pre-compiled version of Qt libs. Otherwise you have to do a compilation yourself as well.

              Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                satysin
                wrote on 14 Jan 2017, 21:10 last edited by
                #9

                Thank you all. I have marked as solved.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  SGaist
                  Lifetime Qt Champion
                  wrote on 14 Jan 2017, 21:23 last edited by
                  #10

                  Hi and welcome to devnet,

                  Certainly not with 5.8. However there was a thread talking about that here.

                  As to why there was not yet a MinGW64, the answer is always the same: it's about manpower and hardware.

                  The CI has its limits and is already under heavy pressure building Qt for the 5.6 to 5.8 branches as well as dev. Each pre-built package is also tested. For Windows alone it means 5 different versions to generate and test.

                  Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
                  Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                  S 1 Reply Last reply 15 Jan 2017, 09:27
                  1
                  • S SGaist
                    14 Jan 2017, 21:23

                    Hi and welcome to devnet,

                    Certainly not with 5.8. However there was a thread talking about that here.

                    As to why there was not yet a MinGW64, the answer is always the same: it's about manpower and hardware.

                    The CI has its limits and is already under heavy pressure building Qt for the 5.6 to 5.8 branches as well as dev. Each pre-built package is also tested. For Windows alone it means 5 different versions to generate and test.

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    satysin
                    wrote on 15 Jan 2017, 09:27 last edited by satysin
                    #11

                    @SGaist Yes I can understand the difficulties in supporting yet another build. Also with MSVC now being "free" for open source projects (with Visual Studio Community) I guess it means MinGW will see a drop in users going forward.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      SGaist
                      Lifetime Qt Champion
                      wrote on 15 Jan 2017, 21:47 last edited by
                      #12

                      Not necessarily, some people prefer to stay with OpenSource Tools and keep the same compiler as much as possible.

                      Also, to get started with Qt on Windows, the MinGW build is ideal since it doesn't require to go somewhere else for additional downloads and setup like Visual Studio does. You just have to select MinGW in the additional software in the installer. Furthermore, it's only been recently that the C++ tools can be downloaded independently, otherwise you had to install the whole of VS just to get the compiler and you also need to install the debugging tools separately. And by whole of VS, you also have to be sure to check C++ otherwise it's installed without it.

                      And from a compatibility point of view, the various versions of VS are not compatible with each others so you always have to ensure that you have all C++ dependencies built correctly.

                      Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
                      Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Y Offline
                        Y Offline
                        yigene
                        wrote on 8 Jan 2018, 13:53 last edited by
                        #13

                        32bit could crash when it reach to 4GB memory right

                        don't like that as we have some vendor products which is 32bit and then the process crash when it reach to 4GB memory!

                        M jsulmJ 2 Replies Last reply 8 Jan 2018, 14:12
                        0
                        • Y yigene
                          8 Jan 2018, 13:53

                          32bit could crash when it reach to 4GB memory right

                          don't like that as we have some vendor products which is 32bit and then the process crash when it reach to 4GB memory!

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          mrjj
                          Lifetime Qt Champion
                          wrote on 8 Jan 2018, 14:12 last edited by
                          #14

                          @yigene

                          Well anything can crash when it runs out of memory
                          and the app is not programmed correctly to handle it.
                          So if you run a 64 bit app on 32 bit OS with 1 GB ram it could just as easy crash as 32 bit version.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Y yigene
                            8 Jan 2018, 13:53

                            32bit could crash when it reach to 4GB memory right

                            don't like that as we have some vendor products which is 32bit and then the process crash when it reach to 4GB memory!

                            jsulmJ Offline
                            jsulmJ Offline
                            jsulm
                            Lifetime Qt Champion
                            wrote on 9 Jan 2018, 06:50 last edited by
                            #15

                            @yigene To add to @mrjj : does your app need that amount of memory? If not and it does not have memory leaks than there is no real reason to have it as 64bit.

                            https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0

                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Groups
                            • Search
                            • Get Qt Extensions
                            • Unsolved