Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. how to load a dynamic library on demand from a QT method
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

how to load a dynamic library on demand from a QT method

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved General and Desktop
21 Posts 5 Posters 10.3k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Q Qt Enthusiast

    What is use of QLibrary::ResolveAllSymbolsHint

    raven-worxR Offline
    raven-worxR Offline
    raven-worx
    Moderators
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @Qt-Enthusiast said in how to load a dynamic library on demand from a QT method:

    What is use of QLibrary::ResolveAllSymbolsHint

    this just resolves all symbols at load time, as said in the docs.
    But still you need a pointer to the function you want to call.

    --- SUPPORT REQUESTS VIA CHAT WILL BE IGNORED ---
    If you have a question please use the forum so others can benefit from the solution in the future

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • hskoglundH Offline
      hskoglundH Offline
      hskoglund
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      Hi, you can use a function pointer like this:

      auto f = (void (*))(Tcl_Interp *) QLibrary("/path/to/libmy.so").resolve("My_Init");
      
      f(&my_tcl_struct);     // calls your function
      
      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • Q Offline
        Q Offline
        Qt Enthusiast
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        for each Call to Qt function I need to have a function pointer correct ?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • hskoglundH Offline
          hskoglundH Offline
          hskoglund
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Sure, but if you only call a function once, you don't need to save the pointer, just use it directly, say like this:

          ((void (*))(Tcl_Interp *) QLibrary("/path/to/libmy.so").resolve("My_Init"))(&my_tcl_struct);
          

          Hope I got all the parentheses right :-)

          kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Q Offline
            Q Offline
            Qt Enthusiast
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            after that can I call QT code dirrectlt

            QTreewidget* tree = new QTreeWidget()..

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Q Offline
              Q Offline
              Qt Enthusiast
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              I do not need to link the QT library in my QExecutable

              kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • hskoglundH hskoglund

                Sure, but if you only call a function once, you don't need to save the pointer, just use it directly, say like this:

                ((void (*))(Tcl_Interp *) QLibrary("/path/to/libmy.so").resolve("My_Init"))(&my_tcl_struct);
                

                Hope I got all the parentheses right :-)

                kshegunovK Offline
                kshegunovK Offline
                kshegunov
                Moderators
                wrote on last edited by kshegunov
                #14

                @hskoglund
                That's why I usually typedef the type locally, looks simpler (and since I despise auto I'm a happy man not using it):

                typedef void (*MyInitPtr)(Tcl_Interp *);
                MyInitPtr My_Init = reinterpret_cast<MyInitPtr>( QLibrary("/path/to/libmy.so").resolve("My_Init") );
                if (My_Init)
                    My_Init(&my_tcl_struct);
                

                @Qt-Enthusiast

                after that can I call QT code dirrectlt

                No, and you won't be able to accomplish that with QLibrary, it's a bit more involved than resolving a simple C-linkage function.

                Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                Q 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • kshegunovK kshegunov

                  @hskoglund
                  That's why I usually typedef the type locally, looks simpler (and since I despise auto I'm a happy man not using it):

                  typedef void (*MyInitPtr)(Tcl_Interp *);
                  MyInitPtr My_Init = reinterpret_cast<MyInitPtr>( QLibrary("/path/to/libmy.so").resolve("My_Init") );
                  if (My_Init)
                      My_Init(&my_tcl_struct);
                  

                  @Qt-Enthusiast

                  after that can I call QT code dirrectlt

                  No, and you won't be able to accomplish that with QLibrary, it's a bit more involved than resolving a simple C-linkage function.

                  Q Offline
                  Q Offline
                  Qt Enthusiast
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  Two questions

                  1 ) Do not need to link the QT library in my final Executable
                  2) also Can u write a sample application how will multiple calls to many Qt functions codes can be called after

                  typedef void (*MyInitPtr)(Tcl_Interp *);
                  MyInitPtr My_Init = reinterpret_cast<MyInitPtr>( QLibrary("/path/to/libmy.so").resolve("My_Init") );
                  if (My_Init)
                  My_Init(&my_tcl_struct);

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Q Qt Enthusiast

                    I do not need to link the QT library in my QExecutable

                    kshegunovK Offline
                    kshegunovK Offline
                    kshegunov
                    Moderators
                    wrote on last edited by kshegunov
                    #16

                    @Qt-Enthusiast

                    Okay, @mrjj encouraged me to give you the full reasoning why those shenanigans are bad. Hence, I'm going to do so. Suppose you have a class MyClass with declaration in "myclass.h":

                    class MyClass
                    {
                    public:
                        MyClass();
                        ~MyClass();
                    
                        void myMethod(int);
                    }
                    

                    and you want to call myMethod(int) of a newly created object of that class. But also suppose that class is compiled into a dynamic library myclasslib.so for all intents and purposes of this discussion. Suppose that the fully decorated symbols' names for the methods of this class are as follows:

                    • MyClass::MyClass$constrDecoration for MyClass::MyClass
                    • MyClass::MyClass$destrDecoration for MyClass::~MyClass
                    • MyClass::MyClass$methodDecoration for MyClass::myMethod(int)

                    So this is how you can create an object, call it's constructor, call the method and finally call the destructor and free the allocated memory (code is not tested, but should be working in principle):

                    #include "myclass.h"
                    
                    int main()
                    {
                        MyClass * obj = reinterpret_cast<MyClass *>(::malloc(sizeof(MyClass))); // Allocate the object
                        // Define two types for a pointer to method with and without an argument
                        typedef void (MyClass::*MyMethodNoArgPtr)();
                        typedef void (MyClass::*MyMethodIntArgPtr)(int);
                    
                        // Get the library
                        QLibrary myLib("myclasslib.so"); //< This is the binary, in which the code for `MyClass` is compiled
                        // Resolve the constructor, destructor and myMethod (notice the fully decorated symbols' names)
                        MyMethodNoArgPtr _construct = reinterpret_cast<MyMethodNoArgPtr>(myLib.resolve("MyClass::MyClass$constrDecoration"));
                        MyMethodNoArgPtr _destruct = reinterpret_cast<MyMethodNoArgPtr>(myLib.resolve("MyClass::MyClass$destrDecoration"));
                        MyMethodIntArgPtr myMethod  = reinterpret_cast<MyMethodIntArgPtr>(myLib.resolve("MyClass::MyClass$methodDecoration"));
                    
                        // Wow, now we can actually call what we need
                        (obj->*_construct)(); //< Call the constructor
                        (obj->*myMethod)(10); //< Call MyClass::myMethod(10)
                        (obj->*_destruct)()   //< Call the destructor
                    
                        // We can free the memory now
                        ::free(obj);
                        return 0;
                    }
                    

                    This all would be equivalent to:

                    #include "myclass.h"
                    
                    int main()
                    {
                        MyClass * obj = new MyClass();
                        obj->myMethod(10);
                        delete obj;
                    
                        return 0;
                    }
                    

                    if we were to leave the loader to do what it's supposed to do!

                    Oh, and by the way, this gets even more complicated when the objects have virtual tables (which QObject derived classes do).

                    Two questions

                    1. Do not need to link the QT library in my final Executable

                    If you use Qt, you do.

                    1. also Can u write a sample application how will multiple calls to many Qt functions codes can be called after

                    I don't understand the question. What multiple calls to which many Qt functions do you have in mind?

                    Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • Q Offline
                      Q Offline
                      Qt Enthusiast
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      because it application as big appilcation of Qt code

                      kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Q Qt Enthusiast

                        because it application as big appilcation of Qt code

                        kshegunovK Offline
                        kshegunovK Offline
                        kshegunov
                        Moderators
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        @Qt-Enthusiast
                        I don't follow.

                        Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Q Offline
                          Q Offline
                          Qt Enthusiast
                          wrote on last edited by kshegunov
                          #19

                          for example

                          I have GUI application which has 1 lacs of QT code

                          for example

                             QTreeWidget *w  = new QTreeWidget;
                            QLabel * w = new QLablep
                          
                              class myTreeView:public QTreView {
                               Q_Object
                             };
                          

                          My question is If my load the dynamic library like

                          is there direct way algorithm is

                          void loadSharedObject() {  
                              //load the
                              // Call the function names directly
                              // no extra code for resolving the function /symbols names   
                              // for example  
                               fun1()
                               fun2()
                           }
                          
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Q Offline
                            Q Offline
                            Qt Enthusiast
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            My question is If my load the dynamic library like

                            is there direct way algorithm is

                            void loadSharedObject() {
                            //load the
                            // Call the function names directly
                            // no extra code for resolving the function /symbols names
                            // for example
                            fun1()
                            fun2()
                            }

                            because the dyanamic libary in my is QLibrary

                            kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Q Qt Enthusiast

                              My question is If my load the dynamic library like

                              is there direct way algorithm is

                              void loadSharedObject() {
                              //load the
                              // Call the function names directly
                              // no extra code for resolving the function /symbols names
                              // for example
                              fun1()
                              fun2()
                              }

                              because the dyanamic libary in my is QLibrary

                              kshegunovK Offline
                              kshegunovK Offline
                              kshegunov
                              Moderators
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              @Qt-Enthusiast said in how to load a dynamic library on demand from a QT method:

                              // Call the function names directly
                              // no extra code for resolving the function /symbols names
                              // for example

                              No there isn't a way to do that. This is what linkers and loaders were created for. You can't leave a bunch of unresolved symbols that are supposed to be explicitly loaded at runtime, it just doesn't work that way.

                              Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2

                              • Login

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups
                              • Search
                              • Get Qt Extensions
                              • Unsolved