I am looking again for possible solutions around a recurring software development challenge. I have found previous clarification requests like the following. 2010-04-22: custom widgets: passing new parameters to constructor (not only QWidget *parent) 2015-08-25: Using UI design files and having a custom widget with custom constructor QT I would like to achieve the complete initialisation for specific objects by the usual constructor execution even if there are parameters involved which have not got a default value. How good is this aspect supported by available development tools (including for graphical user interface design)?

Hi I have noticed another software development challenge for this programming interface because I came along the need to pass references to specific widget constructors in a hierarchy (and not only to a single widget). The normal solution for using RAII ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_acquisition_is_initialization ) is to avoid using Designer and construct the GUI in code. That way anything is possible. I am curious to know how such an approach would look like. The basic structure would be like (pseudo code) CustomWidget * CreateMyClass(QStandardItemModel &SomeModel) { QUiLoader loader; QFile file(":/forms/myform.ui"); file.open(QFile::ReadOnly); QWidget *myWidget = loader.load(&file, this); CustomWidget *realOne=qobject_cast<CustomWidget *>(myWidget ) if ( ! realOne) { reportError();return nullptr;} // safety check realOne->setModel(SomeModel); // fixup the data return realOne; } My concrete use case would be “ ResultsView(QStandardItemModel& sim, QWidget* parent) ”. But to use & would demand that the model would stay alive for the lifespan of ResultsView and where should Creator put it? Generate some global variables ? Where should Creator get the Mydata from ? The extra data will be passed during the usual control flow by the affected classes. The development tools would need to be extended once more. I cannot see this be possible. You would have to register hooks for all classes that could specify as text templates how the constructor should look and be generated. The only workaround i know is to setup any models/data members after the setupUI() call in the constructor. Only option would be to default construct one … Can any further software design options be considered? Will parameter packs eventually become relevant here? I doubt such feature will be added. However we are a user forum and the Qt devs hang out at http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo

Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

QtWS: Super Early Bird Tickets Available!

Creating custom widgets based on constructors with parameters without default values

Unsolved General and Desktop

17 Posts 4 Posters 5.9k Views

E Offline

E Offline
elfring
replied to mrjj on last edited by

#8

I doubt such feature will be added.

🔮 Can improvements be achieved for the tool “user interface compiler” anyhow?
A 1 Reply Last reply
0
A Offline

A Offline
aha_1980 Lifetime Qt Champion
replied to elfring on last edited by

#9

@elfring

Can improvements be achieved for the tool “user interface compiler” anyhow?

Why not? As always with open source, you can modify it according to your need (with respect to the license, of course).

If your improvements look reasonable for the developers, they might be added to further versions too. If you have such intentions, you should really discuss them with the developers on the Qt development mailing list.

Regards
Qt has to stay free or it will die.

E 1 Reply Last reply
0
E Offline

E Offline
elfring
replied to aha_1980 on last edited by

#10

If your improvements look reasonable for the developers, …

Do “Qt users” care any more for the creation of non-default-constructible widgets (including views)?
A 1 Reply Last reply
0
A Offline

A Offline
aha_1980 Lifetime Qt Champion
replied to elfring on last edited by

#11

Hi @elfring,

Different users have different needs and write different software.

As said by @mrjj before, all can be done in code without designer. You can even create basic dialogs in Designer and complete them in your code. You can extend Designer with own widgets. You can write your own code generator...

So much possibilities :)
Qt has to stay free or it will die.

E 3 Replies Last reply
1
E Offline

E Offline
elfring
replied to aha_1980 on last edited by

#12

…, all can be done in code without designer.

I would appreciate if the visual design tool can work together with available user interface compilers to get the creation of non-default-constructible widgets (including views) working in a safe and convenient way.
Does this aspect require another update for the Qt program “uic” (or even a replacement)?

You can even create basic dialogs in Designer and complete them in your code.

Will any more examples be published where such approaches can be insufficient for safe application object configurations?
1 Reply Last reply
0
E Offline
E Offline
elfring
replied to aha_1980 on last edited by

#13
You can write your own code generator...
- Have you ever heard about concrete approaches to perform the desired data processing for Qt Designer's UI file format (or the QML file format) by a corresponding C++ class template library?
- Will source code introspection take the handling of non-default-constructible widgets (including views) better into account then?
1 Reply Last reply
0
E Offline
E Offline
elfring
replied to aha_1980 on last edited by

#14
…, all can be done in code without designer.
- Can Qt users (or developers) become more interested in the support for object construction without default parameters?
- Would you like to see extensions for data format descriptions and corresponding development tools?
J 1 Reply Last reply
0
J Offline

J Offline
jsulm Lifetime Qt Champion
replied to elfring on last edited by

#15

@elfring said in Creating custom widgets based on constructors with parameters without default values:

Can Qt users (or developers) become more interested in the support for object construction without default parameters?

You should ask Qt developers ( @aha_1980 already gave you the link), not in this user forum...
https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

E 1 Reply Last reply
0
E Offline

E Offline
elfring
replied to jsulm on last edited by

#16

You should ask Qt developers …

I am curious on how the clarification will evolve for the topic “Support for object creation based on constructors with parameters without default values”.
M 1 Reply Last reply
0
M Offline
M Offline
mrjj Lifetime Qt Champion
replied to elfring on last edited by mrjj

#17
@elfring
Hi
- I am curious on how the clarification will evolve
Me too.
As what you wish for - takes a huge amount of code and forces a preconceived structure on the users
and its going from very complicated and involving to plain impossible in scope :)

In 30 years of programming, i have not seen any WYSIWYG editor that supported adding
unknown classes to static code generation for GUI instance construction.
1 Reply Last reply
2