Safest way to delete workers when TCP server is closing
-
- the connects should be done when
thread
andworkerClient
are created - you forgot the "almost" part.
- the connects should be done when
-
@VRonin
I made a small example illustrating the problem:threadex.h
#ifndef THREADEX_H #define THREADEX_H #include <QThread> #include <QDebug> class ThreadEx : public QThread { Q_OBJECT public: explicit ThreadEx(QObject *parent = nullptr) : QThread(parent) { qDebug() << "thread: " << this << "created in: " << QThread::currentThread(); } ~ThreadEx() { qDebug() << "thread: " << this << "deleted in: " << QThread::currentThread(); } }; #endif // THREADEX_H
main.cpp
#include <QApplication> #include <QWidget> #include "threadex.h" int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { QApplication a(argc, argv); ThreadEx *thread = new ThreadEx; QObject::connect(thread, &ThreadEx::finished, thread, &ThreadEx::deleteLater); QObject::connect(qApp, &QApplication::aboutToQuit, thread, &ThreadEx::quit); QObject::connect(qApp, &QApplication::aboutToQuit, []() { qDebug() << "aboutToQuit()"; }); thread->wait(); // don't know why i should block here, but this always returns true QWidget widget; widget.show(); return a.exec(); }
Output:
thread: ThreadEx(0x768ca0) created in: QThread(0x605fe0) aboutToQuit()
ThreadEx::~ThreadEx()
is not getting called. How can i be sure that cleanup was successfull and there is no running thread left?Just for clarification:
QObject::deleteLater()
documentation says thatThe object will be deleted when control returns to the event loop
. Does that mean that deletion of allQObjects
viadeleteLater()
is controlled byQApplication
main event loop? -
@dream_captain said in Safest way to delete workers when TCP server is closing:
thread->wait();
why do you call wait?
-
@dream_captain
Good Morning,
wait
will always return true, if the thread is not started, and in your example, the thread is not started. you simply call wait on it.To expand your basic example:
#include <QApplication> #include <QWidget> #include "threadex.h" int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { QApplication a(argc, argv); ThreadEx *thread = new ThreadEx; QObject::connect(thread, &ThreadEx::finished, thread, &ThreadEx::deleteLater); QObject::connect(qApp, &QApplication::aboutToQuit, thread, &ThreadEx::quit); QObject::connect(qApp, &QApplication::aboutToQuit, []() { qDebug() << "aboutToQuit()"; }); thread.start(); .... .... thread->quit(); thread->wait(); QWidget widget; widget.show(); return a.exec(); }
-
@J.Hilk
Oh, I admit that i simply forget to start the thread. But shouldn't the deletion of thread be handled by QApplication in the snippet below? If i've understood the documentation correctly, there is no need to callquit()
andwait()
explicitly.int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { QApplication a(argc, argv); ThreadEx *thread = new ThreadEx; QObject::connect(thread, &ThreadEx::finished, thread, &ThreadEx::deleteLater); QObject::connect(qApp, &QApplication::aboutToQuit, thread, &ThreadEx::quit); QObject::connect(qApp, &QApplication::aboutToQuit, []() { qDebug() << "aboutToQuit()"; }); thread->start(); QWidget widget; widget.show(); return a.exec(); }
Still no ThreadEx destructor.
-
@dream_captain Well, I'm not entierly sure,
I took inspiration from the example in the docs:
class Worker : public QObject { Q_OBJECT QThread workerThread; public slots: void doWork(const QString ¶meter) { // ... emit resultReady(result); } signals: void resultReady(const QString &result); }; class Controller : public QObject { Q_OBJECT QThread workerThread; public: Controller() { Worker *worker = new Worker; worker->moveToThread(&workerThread); connect(&workerThread, SIGNAL(finished()), worker, SLOT(deleteLater())); connect(this, SIGNAL(operate(QString)), worker, SLOT(doWork(QString))); connect(worker, SIGNAL(resultReady(QString)), this, SLOT(handleResults(QString))); workerThread.start(); } ~Controller() { workerThread.quit(); workerThread.wait(); } public slots: void handleResults(const QString &); signals: void operate(const QString &); };
-
Updated example with Worker object.
worker.h
#ifndef WORKER_H #define WORKER_H #include <QObject> #include <QDebug> #include <QThread> class Worker : public QObject { Q_OBJECT public: explicit Worker(QObject *parent = nullptr) : QObject(parent) { qDebug() << "worker: " << this << "created in: " << QThread::currentThread(); } ~Worker() { qDebug() << "worker: " << this << "deleted in: " << QThread::currentThread(); } }; #endif // WORKER_H
threadex.h
#ifndef THREADEX_H #define THREADEX_H #include <QThread> #include <QDebug> class ThreadEx : public QThread { Q_OBJECT public: explicit ThreadEx(QObject *parent = nullptr) : QThread(parent) { qDebug() << "thread: " << this << "created in: " << QThread::currentThread(); } ~ThreadEx() { qDebug() << "thread: " << this << "deleted in: " << QThread::currentThread(); } }; #endif // THREADEX_H
main.cpp
#include <QApplication> #include <QWidget> #include "threadex.h" #include "worker.h" int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { QApplication a(argc, argv); ThreadEx *thread = new ThreadEx; Worker *worker = new Worker; worker->moveToThread(thread); QObject::connect(thread, &ThreadEx::finished, thread, &ThreadEx::deleteLater); QObject::connect(thread, &ThreadEx::finished, worker, &Worker::deleteLater); QObject::connect(qApp, &QApplication::aboutToQuit, thread, &ThreadEx::quit); QObject::connect(qApp, &QApplication::aboutToQuit, []() { qDebug() << "aboutToQuit()"; }); thread->start(); QWidget widget; widget.show(); return a.exec(); }
Output:
thread: ThreadEx(0x748d90) created in: QThread(0x606fe0) worker: Worker(0x733020) created in: QThread(0x606fe0) aboutToQuit() worker: Worker(0x733020) deleted in: ThreadEx(0x748d90)
Looks like
QApplication
process Worker'sdeleteLater()
fine, but don't want to process ThreadEx'sdeleteLater()
. -
@dream_captain said in Safest way to delete workers when TCP server is closing:
But shouldn't the deletion of thread be handled by QApplication in the snippet below?
If you do not start the thread finished() signal will not be emitted and deleteLater() slot will not be called.
So, if you do not delete the thread explicitly using "delete" it will not be deleted.
Who and why should delete it in this case - it does not even have a parent? QApplication does not do memory management.