Nullpointer passed when using pointer to const object as parameter for c++ method called from qml

  • Consider the following minimal example:

    #include <QApplication>
    #include <QQmlApplicationEngine>
    #include <QtQml>
    #include "test.h"
    int main(int argc, char *argv[])
        QApplication app(argc, argv);
        qmlRegisterType<Test>("nanotron.test.test", 1, 0, "Test");
        QQmlApplicationEngine engine;
        return app.exec();


    #ifndef TEST_H
    #define TEST_H
    #include <QObject>
    class Test : public QObject
        Q_PROPERTY(int member MEMBER m_member NOTIFY memberChanged)
        explicit Test(QObject *parent = 0);
        Q_INVOKABLE void print(const Test* other);
        void memberChanged();
    public slots:
        int m_member;
    Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(const Test*)
    #endif // TEST_H


    #include "test.h"
    #include <QDebug>
    Test::Test(QObject *parent) : QObject(parent)
    void Test::print(const Test *other)
        qWarning() << "Value of test object's meber:" << other->m_member;


    import QtQuick 2.5
    import QtQuick.Controls 1.4
    import nanotron.test.test 1.0
    ApplicationWindow {
        visible: true
        width: 640
        height: 480
        title: qsTr("Hello World")
        Component {
            id: testComponent
            Test {
        menuBar: MenuBar {
            Menu {
                title: qsTr("File")
                MenuItem {
                    text: qsTr("&Open")
                    onTriggered: {
                        var test1 = testComponent.createObject()
                        var test2 = testComponent.createObject()
                        test1.member = 4711
                MenuItem {
                    text: qsTr("Exit")
                    onTriggered: Qt.quit();
        Label {
            text: qsTr("Hello World")
            anchors.centerIn: parent

    When I run this and click on File -> Open the program crashes. In the debugger I can see that NULL is passed to the print method of the test class. I can trace it back to the qt_metacall method of the moc class that is generated for test.
    When I remove the const from the parameter in print, i.e change

    Q_INVOKABLE void print(const Test* other);


    Q_INVOKABLE void print(Test* other);


    void Test::print(const Test *other)


    void Test::print(Test *other)


    Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(const Test*)



    it works fine.

    Can someone explain this to me? Is it a bug? Is it expected? Is it possible to use pointers to const objects when passing parameters from QML to c++?

  • Come on!
    Nobody any idea?
    What could be the reason for changing a valid pointer to a null pointer on the callers side when the signature of the parameter is const ptr??
    Is it just me?
    Can anybody reproduce this???

  • Lifetime Qt Champion

    Hi and welcome to devnet,

    You should use qmlRegisterType<const Test>("nanotron.test.test", 1, 0, "Test");

  • Thank you very much!
    I guessed it must be something trivial. Of course I have to register the exact type that I want to use with the meta type system.
    I'm not sure if like the fact that registering the wrong type leads to a null pointer being passed. Do you happen to know what is the reason for that? Is it the unchecked result of a dynamic cast? I certainly would prefer, if an exception could be raised in that case. Do you think this would be possible to add?

  • Lifetime Qt Champion

    You're welcome !

    No I don't, sorry, I haven't touched the internals of the QtQuick/QML modules.

    That's a question you should bring to the interest mailing list. You'll find there Qt's developers/maintainers(this forum is more user oriented)

Log in to reply

Looks like your connection to Qt Forum was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.