Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. Mobile and Embedded
  4. Qt on Android 2.3 seems promising
QtWS25 Last Chance

Qt on Android 2.3 seems promising

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Mobile and Embedded
21 Posts 15 Posters 28.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    jaak
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Users doesn't care what language / tool an application is written in. So I don't think a Qt version for Android in anyway affect sales for Nokia. But some people do think that Qt shouldn't be used to create applications for a competitors platform. I think such an argument is baseless. Also I don't understand how the problem of differentiation happens, since on Android, only third part apps will be written in Qt. The UI layer of the phone will always be Android native code. If an app becomes so popular, it will be available on all platforms and user don't care for Qt or dalvik or ... sdk. If Qt is ported to Android, then
    Qt will be the primary platform for mobile development. Qt will be the king.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Offline
      D Offline
      dangelog
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      [quote]Users doesn’t care what language / tool an application is written in. So I don’t think a Qt version for Android in anyway affect sales for Nokia.[/quote]

      User don't, developers and companies do! If one wants to reach the largest market share for its application, the "Write once / deploy on symbian+maemo+meego+android+..." strategy is winning.

      Software Engineer
      KDAB (UK) Ltd., a KDAB Group company

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        jaak
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        [quote author="peppe" date="1292579820"][quote]Users doesn’t care what language / tool an application is written in. So I don’t think a Qt version for Android in anyway affect sales for Nokia.[/quote]

        User don't, developers and companies do! If one wants to reach the largest market share for its application, the "Write once / deploy on symbian+maemo+meego+android+..." strategy is winning.[/quote]

        Exactly. It will be a big win for mobile developers.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Offline
          C Offline
          changsheng230
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          Ha, No one votes for "Bad" :) , though Nokia did not invest it.

          Chang Sheng
          常升

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Offline
            D Offline
            dreevespracticeinsight.net
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            What is important for Qt developers is "write once and run everywhere". I am a Nokia commercial customer. Ultimately Nokia benefits from meeting the needs of its customers.

            So supporting Qt on Android platforms is good.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Offline
              R Offline
              robson.ramiro
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              I think that nokia is spending a big oportunity to come in, strong, a fight against iOS to gain more market share.

              I´m tried to use Lighthouse, but without success... (problems posted on site)

              If anyone have way to make it works I´ll appreciate a lot!

              []s

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Offline
                D Offline
                doubitchou
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                I am in the same case as David one : the need to commercialy deploy the same app for all platform and actually what we are doing is a java app for android and blackberry phones, Xcode for Ipad/Ipod mobiles, Qt for the others platforms.

                So when Win7 mobile seems to avoid Qt apps now, why having "C.O.D.E." and in that case with android would be a bad thing ?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  mohsen
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  i vote for Android too

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Schneidi
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    I can't wait to start developing on Android systems.
                    So I hope that the lighhouse project will get some support.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Offline
                      D Offline
                      DenisKormalev
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      Scheidi, you can start it now. Necessitas is not a "started-yesterday" project so it can be used in development now (we used it without any critical problems, but of course it is non-stable software so you should double test it before production)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        subin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        Please don't forget to update here too!
                        https://www.facebook.com/qt.android

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups
                        • Search
                        • Get Qt Extensions
                        • Unsolved