Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. Qt Creator and other tools
  4. A Sincere Request: Please Bring AI Assistant to the Open-Source Edition of Qt Creator
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

A Sincere Request: Please Bring AI Assistant to the Open-Source Edition of Qt Creator

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Qt Creator and other tools
2 Posts 2 Posters 53 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JasonWongJ Offline
    JasonWongJ Offline
    JasonWong
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    I have been a devoted Qt and Qt Creator user for more than ten years and truly appreciate the value this framework and IDE bring to cross-platform development. Nevertheless, the AI Assistant is currently available only in the commercial edition, leaving many in the open-source (GPL/LGPL) community disappointed.

    Intelligent coding assistants are now a staple of modern development. VS Code, Cursor, and other mainstream IDEs already integrate either cloud-based or on-device language models. By comparison, Qt Creator currently offers only basic GitHub Copilot completion, which falls short of today’s AI-augmented workflows. Even if I am willing to host an LLM locally (e.g., through Ollama or another self-hosted solution), the open-source edition simply cannot enable the AI Assistant.

    In my daily work I rely heavily on models like OpenAI Codex and GPT. Because Qt Creator lacks such support, I must push my projects to Git and continue coding in cloud IDEs just to leverage AI—yet the productivity gains remain undeniable.

    Therefore, I kindly ask Qt to consider:

    Is there a roadmap for bringing AI Assistant to the open-source edition of Qt Creator?

    If cloud-computing cost is the primary concern, could open-source users be allowed to connect their own local LLM back-ends?

    Given that individual developers and small companies cannot easily afford the high commercial license, would Qt consider a more flexible pricing model—such as a separate subscription for the AI plug-in?

    If AI Assistant remains exclusive to the commercial edition, Qt Creator risks losing a significant portion of its loyal individual developer base as AI capabilities become standard elsewhere. I sincerely hope the Qt team will listen to the community and open the door to AI features for the open-source edition—or at least provide a clear roadmap and viable alternatives. Thank you for your consideration!

    jsulmJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • JasonWongJ JasonWong

      I have been a devoted Qt and Qt Creator user for more than ten years and truly appreciate the value this framework and IDE bring to cross-platform development. Nevertheless, the AI Assistant is currently available only in the commercial edition, leaving many in the open-source (GPL/LGPL) community disappointed.

      Intelligent coding assistants are now a staple of modern development. VS Code, Cursor, and other mainstream IDEs already integrate either cloud-based or on-device language models. By comparison, Qt Creator currently offers only basic GitHub Copilot completion, which falls short of today’s AI-augmented workflows. Even if I am willing to host an LLM locally (e.g., through Ollama or another self-hosted solution), the open-source edition simply cannot enable the AI Assistant.

      In my daily work I rely heavily on models like OpenAI Codex and GPT. Because Qt Creator lacks such support, I must push my projects to Git and continue coding in cloud IDEs just to leverage AI—yet the productivity gains remain undeniable.

      Therefore, I kindly ask Qt to consider:

      Is there a roadmap for bringing AI Assistant to the open-source edition of Qt Creator?

      If cloud-computing cost is the primary concern, could open-source users be allowed to connect their own local LLM back-ends?

      Given that individual developers and small companies cannot easily afford the high commercial license, would Qt consider a more flexible pricing model—such as a separate subscription for the AI plug-in?

      If AI Assistant remains exclusive to the commercial edition, Qt Creator risks losing a significant portion of its loyal individual developer base as AI capabilities become standard elsewhere. I sincerely hope the Qt team will listen to the community and open the door to AI features for the open-source edition—or at least provide a clear roadmap and viable alternatives. Thank you for your consideration!

      jsulmJ Offline
      jsulmJ Offline
      jsulm
      Lifetime Qt Champion
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @JasonWong Keep in mind that this is user forum.
      You should ask on Qt developer mailing list or file a change request in Qt bug tracker.

      https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

      1 Reply Last reply
      1

      • Login

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • Users
      • Groups
      • Search
      • Get Qt Extensions
      • Unsolved