little bug when creating Q_OBJECT C++ classes
-
If I create a C++ based on the Q_OBJECT I have a little problem. I add a Q_PROPERTY with myVariable name. Then I do refactor->create missing members.
Then I compile and get an error in some C++ file starting with moc_"my class name". The error is that setMyVariable or setmyVariable does not exist. Essentially it's an issue with code that is automatically generated. The "convention" is to name a variable or function with the first word in the name starting lower case and any further words capitalized. Because functions are automatically generated by putting a word in front of the variable name, in one instance the first word of the variable name is capitalized as it is now the second word and in the other case this is missed.
I don't know if there is a better place to report bugs?
@Groundbounce Better to show some code about how Property is applied.
-
C Christian Ehrlicher moved this topic from General and Desktop on
-
I start typing Q_PROPERTY and the Qt IDE suggests the standard list of variable and functions, I hit enter, I set the variable type to int and the variable name to myVariable.
Then I right click Q_PROPERTY and select refactor->create missing members, I then build the empty project with the empty class and the error around the exact spelling of setmyVariable() or setMyVariable are reported by the compiler in the moc_myclass.cpp file. This file is not created by me and is not in my source directory, it is auto generated and put into the build directory, I assume it deals with signals etc for me.
-
I remember having some similar issues in previous QtCreator versions.
Are you up to date with your QtCreator? what version are you using? -
Version 15.01. I always install updates.
I take it the warnings about the moc_.... file not being part of the project is nothing to worry about.
-
I think I have the answer: https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/manual/cmake-qt.7.html#automoc
So if I am guessing correctly cmake is doing something for Qt in generating code and the Qt IDE is doing another part. They don't both follow the same convention....
-
I think I have the answer: https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/manual/cmake-qt.7.html#automoc
So if I am guessing correctly cmake is doing something for Qt in generating code and the Qt IDE is doing another part. They don't both follow the same convention....
@Groundbounce said in little bug when creating Q_OBJECT C++ classes:
They don't both follow the same convention....
Since QtCreator is an IDE and cmake a build system I don't know what you mean with 'convention'...
The naming of a function is neither a problem of an IDE nor the build system. -
The function is auto generated, the function name used in autogenerated files does not match the prototype in the Q_PROPERTY declaration.
-
The function is auto generated, the function name used in autogenerated files does not match the prototype in the Q_PROPERTY declaration.
@Groundbounce said in little bug when creating Q_OBJECT C++ classes:
The function is auto generated, the function name used in autogenerated files does not match the prototype in the Q_PROPERTY declaration.
Since the generation is done from the header file and Q_PROPERTY they can't differ. As soon as you modify the header, the moc file is re-generated.
-
Well, they do! I have simply followed the instructions on Qt academy - for what they are worth..... on first build, it fails. I'm sure there is more that needs doing than what was in the tutorial, something about AUTOMOC maybe?. I suspect that like the incorrect instructions for the QRC system I will spend several hours figuring it out for myself, and like any good programmer, keep that knowledge to myself!
-
The issue is that QT Creator does not capitalize the first letter of the variable when it adds a word to the start when using the refractor menu option.
The MOC file has it automatically renamed. As the MOC file is constantly regenerated I will need to correct the function definitions and declarations.
