QProcess and Ctrl-Z + BG on Linux
-
I have a Qt gui application that runs on Linux.
It is a QApplication that uses QProcess to do some work when a button is clicked. The finished signal on the QProcess is connected to a slot.
connect(workerProcess, SIGNAL(finished(int,QProcess::ExitStatus)), this, SLOT(onWorkerFinished(int,QProcess::ExitStatus)));
Things work fine when I run the program normally on commandline
% myProgramor run it in the background
% myProgram&However, if I run it normally, then suspend it using Ctrl-Z and put it in the background, things stop working
% myprogram
Ctrl+Z
bgThe GUI still responds. But when I click the button, it seems to start the QProcess but the slot connected to the "finished" signal never gets called.
Not sure what's going on. Does suspending the application and putting it in the background somehow mess the signal/slot connection?
Would appreciate any help to fix this?
Thanks
-
@Sameer
I am slightly surprised anything Ui works while in suspended, but never tried it. Then you are saying your code spawns aQProcess
, but when suspended user can still click a button and start it? Does not sound possible, prove it.Basically I would not expect anything to happen when you try to interact with a suspended process, Qt or not.
-
@JonB said in QProcess and Ctrl-Z + BG on Linux:
I am slightly surprised anything Ui works while in suspended
The process is put into background (bg), so the terminal is not blocked. So, the app is not suspended.
-
@jsulm
Sorry, but you are incorrect :) [See my EDIT at end, where I correct myself and apologise, I had not seen that the OP had usedbg
after Ctrl+Z.] Been using Ctrl+Z from terminal processes since (probably) before you were born ;-)ctrl+z stops the process and returns you to the current shell. You can now type fg to continue process, or type bg to continue the process in the background.
See here:
jon@ubuntu-22:~$ sleep 500 ^Z [1]+ Stopped sleep 500 jon@ubuntu-22:~$ ps -lu jon | grep sleep 0 T 1000 2967 2424 0 80 0 - 4256 do_sig pts/0 00:00:00 sleep jon@ubuntu-22:~$ bg [1]+ sleep 500 & jon@ubuntu-22:~$ ps -lu jon | grep sleep 0 S 1000 2967 2424 0 80 0 - 4256 do_sys pts/0 00:00:00 sleep jon@ubuntu-22:~$
Note the following:
- After pressing Ctrl+Z the shell responds with
Stopped
. Stopped means ... stopped! Not running. - The
ps
showsT
for the state of thesleep
. That is for "stopped". - It is only when I type
bg
("background") that the process is put into the background and at that point allowed to continue. It is only now that it will run but pause if it tries to do input or output. Note theps
now shows the process onS
, which is for "sleeping", i.e. running but happening to be sleeping at present.
The OP mentioned nothing about asking the shell to put it into the background after pressing Ctrl+Z.
Try the following:
- From a terminal run
gedit
. At this point you can type characters into it. - Now press Ctrl+Z. Shell reports
gedit
is "Stopped". Now try typing into its window: nothing happens, the characters are not even echoed. Thegedit
is stopped and does not accept any input! (After a while Ubuntu/desktop manager reports "program is not responding".) - Now type
bg
. You can interact with thegedit
again :)
EDIT
Ohhh, I never saw the OP typedbg
! That's the trouble with people not using Code to mark this. Now I see it in the title too. Sorry!OK, my apologies, we are talking about after typing
bg
here, right? That changes things!@Sameer
I might investigate this behaviour. As you say, in principle Ctrl+Z followed bybg
ought be the same as running it with&
from the start. However, one difference is that it receives two Linux signals in the former case, might depend how they were handled.Could you make two things clear:
- Your code includes
workerProcess
. Is this just the name for yourQProcess
, what I want to know is whether your code here involves any threads? I will assume/hope not. - You press the button which runs
QProcess::start()
after you have done the suspend/background, right?
Also, for the record, what is the process you are spawning from
QProcess
? Is is a non-UI program which (might do) stdin/stdout (likegcc
), or is it a process that will use the desktop windowing system (likegedit
)? - After pressing Ctrl+Z the shell responds with
-
@JonB said in QProcess and Ctrl-Z + BG on Linux:
The OP mentioned nothing about asking the shell to put it into the background after pressing Ctrl+Z.
well, the original post reads
However, if I run it normally, then suspend it using Ctrl-Z and put it in the background, things stop working
% myprogram
Ctrl+Z
bgTo the original question: I understand you send the GUI process in the background, which launches another process via QProcess. Is the sub-process running already when you send the GUI process to the background? If yes, what's the state of it after you sent the GUI process in the background? Is it actually exiting then later on, and just the finished() signal is missing?
A minimal reproducible example might help. I'm not ruling out a Qt defect, as the QProcess logic is sometimes a bit special, but it doesn't seem like a known issue at least...
-
@Sameer , @jsulm , @kkoehne
To make up for my earlier misunderstanding, have tried following standalone code:#include <QApplication> #include <QDebug> #include <QLayout> #include <QObject> #include <QProcess> #include <QPushButton> #include <QWidget> class MyWidget : public QWidget { private: QProcess *proc; public slots: void onClicked() { proc = new QProcess; QObject::connect(proc, &QProcess::started, this, []() { qDebug() << "Process started"; } ); QObject::connect(proc, QOverload<int, QProcess::ExitStatus>::of(&QProcess::finished), this, []() { qDebug() << "Process finished"; } ); proc->start("sleep", { "10"} ); } }; int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { QApplication a(argc, argv); MyWidget w; w.setLayout(new QVBoxLayout); QPushButton *pb = new QPushButton("QProcess"); w.layout()->addWidget(pb); w.show(); QObject::connect(pb, &QPushButton::clicked, &w, &MyWidget::onClicked); return a.exec(); }
Qt 5.15 (I don't have Qt6), Ubuntu 22.04. Run from terminal. Press Ctrl+Z there after launching, then
bg
. Then press the button. I do see in the terminal from the debug outputProcess started
followed byProcess finished
10 seconds later. So it works normally.Suggest you first try this, does it work for you? If it does compare against your code to find a difference.
-
@JonB OP here. My apologies. I didn't have notifications on. So didn't see these useful responses till today.
I am still trying to solve this problem.
To answer your questions- workerProcess is just the name of the QProcess. No threads involved?
- I DO press the button which starts the workerProcess AFTER the suspend/background
- The worker process is doing non UI stuff.
Hope this answers your questions. Desperately seeking help on this.
-
@JonB
I tried your simple example and it works as expected. I see both the started and finished slots being called even after suspending the application with ctrl+Z and putting it in background.However same thing doesn't seem to happen in my code. Unfortunately my code is too complex to put here. But I tried the following experiment.
Where I start my process, I also started a test process similar to your example.
m_testProcess = new QProcess; QObject::connect(m_testProcess, &QProcess::started, this, []() { qDebug() << "m_testProcess started"; } ); QObject::connect(m_testProcess, QOverload<int, QProcess::ExitStatus>::of(&QProcess::finished), this, []() { qDebug() << "m_testProcess finished"; } ); m_testProcess->start("sleep", { "1"} );
Before Ctrl-Z + bg, I see both started and finished messages.
After Ctrl-Z + bg, I see the started message but not the finished message.Any idea what might be going on?
-
@SameerK said in QProcess and Ctrl-Z + BG on Linux:
However same thing doesn't seem to happen in my code. Unfortunately my code is too complex to put here.
I think you know the likely response here! If code works in simple case but not in your "complex" case then probably nobody can guess. You really need to comment out swathes of code till you can find where the different behaviour seems to emanate from.
A couple of tests here. I don't know what we will make of the answers, but let's gather the information:
- Where you do your test you say you do this
sleep()
as well as your process. Eliminate your process for a while, just in case that somehow interferes. - Instead of going
bg
after the Ctrl+Z tryfg
instead. Any difference? - When you do not get the
QProcess::finished
signal, useps
to find the current state of the sub-process. Is it running? Suspended? Zombied? Removed from running processes and no longer found? - Attach slot to signal void QProcess::stateChanged(QProcess::ProcessState newState). What state changes do you get?
- When setting off sub-process start a
QTimer
for, say, once per second. Have it report QProcess::ProcessState QProcess::state() const. What state does that repeatedly report?
- Where you do your test you say you do this
-
@JonB said in QProcess and Ctrl-Z + BG on Linux:
These were very useful suggestions.
- Where you do your test you say you do this
sleep()
as well as your process. Eliminate your process for a while, just in case that somehow interferes.
Did this. Still the same result. - Instead of going
bg
after the Ctrl+Z tryfg
instead. Any difference?
Doingfg
insteadbg
produces same result. - When you do not get the
QProcess::finished
signal, useps
to find the current state of the sub-process. Is it running? Suspended? Zombied? Removed from running processes and no longer found?
Shows up as follows withps
- [sleep] <defunct> - Attach slot to signal void QProcess::stateChanged(QProcess::ProcessState newState). What state changes do you get?
I get Starting and Running, nothing afterwards.
Debug: m_runProcess stateChanged - QProcess::Starting
Debug: m_runProcess stateChanged - QProcess::Running
Debug: m_runProcess started - When setting off sub-process start a
QTimer
for, say, once per second. Have it report QProcess::ProcessState QProcess::state() const. What state does that repeatedly report?
Tried this. It reports the process as "Running"
- Where you do your test you say you do this
-
@SameerK said in QProcess and Ctrl-Z + BG on Linux:
Shows up as follows withps - [sleep] <defunct>
Not sure. From what you say I think the
sleep
sub-process has exited but not been waited on by its parent. Qt parent still thinks process is running, hence nofinished
.Really I'm afraid as you know we have demonstrated in a small test program that it behaves OK there. I think you will have to find out what differs in your real program.
-
Yes that's what seems to be happening.
Another thing I discovered. This happens only with an explicit Ctrl+Z.
If I send a SIGSTOP to the main application process from another terminal and then put it into background, things are fine. -
@SameerK
I had meant to mention testing that. That's ridiculous. But again I'm afraid I don't know what it tells us, nor what you can do about it. I reiterate that since it does not happen on my small test program you are going to have to find out what is different in your complex situation, somehow. -
@JonB I went back to your small test program and ran another experiment and now I can get that to fail too!!!
Invoke test application
Ctrl-Z
bg
Press button
Things work fine (Get both started and finished signals)Invoke test application
Press button
Things work fine (Get both started and finished signals)
Ctrl-Z
bg
Press button
Things don't work anymore (Get started signal but no finished signal!!!)Btw, I am using Qt5.12 and on RedHat Enterprise Linux 8.6