LGPL for commercial proprietary library
-
I understand well if I need distribute proprietary application with LGPL and Qt. But how can I distribute a commercial library using Qt? Is this possible? Well, I made a small toolkit with some functions. It uses Qt5. I build it as DLL for Windows and SO for *NIXes. Can I sell it under LGPL without source code and without Qt libraries? Or should I include Qt libraries nevertheless?
If somebody read any article about this specific situation - please give me link. Or may be somebody here can ask this from Qt support. This case is not clearly covered by Qt docs.
-
Your library may still fall under the terms of an 'Application' as it is defined in the LGPL. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-3.0.en.html
-
-
@Gourmet said in LGPL for commercial proprietary library:
@SGaist said in LGPL for commercial proprietary library:
Felgo seems to do it.
What is most interesting - Are you sure Felgo uses LGPL instead of commercial Qt license?
I don't know. A question you should ask them.
