Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. Qt Creator and other tools
  4. Using CMake (was "fake Qt installation")
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Using CMake (was "fake Qt installation")

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Qt Creator and other tools
23 Posts 4 Posters 3.5k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K kuzulis

    QBS is still not dead, it is now being actively developed by the open source community and has a many changes.

    For QBS, it’s not a problem that CMake is the default Qt build system, it still supports in QtCreator. QBS is not only for Qt, but for everything else, especially for a bare metal programming (especially it is a best choose for a DIY projects, because it support a lot of architectures and toolchains).

    jsulmJ Offline
    jsulmJ Offline
    jsulm
    Lifetime Qt Champion
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @kuzulis OK, didn't know QBS is actively developed

    https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Offline
      K Offline
      kuzulis
      Qt Champions 2020
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      @jsulm ,

      Surprize:

      • https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/project:qbs%252Fqbs+status:merged
      • https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/project:qbs%252Fqbs+status:open

      :))

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K kuzulis

        Try QBS instead of CMake and do not suffer (if no any special requirements). In this case you don't need in this hard manipulations (with CMake you need in a custom toolchain file, in a separate Make or Ninja utilities and so on)...

        PS: F.e. I use QBS with ESP8266 && non-os-sdk and all fine. :)

        mzimmersM Offline
        mzimmersM Offline
        mzimmers
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        @kuzulis thank you for the suggestion. The application I've written makes full use of the ESP IDF, which I believe is exclusively CMake. I don't think converting the entire build system to QBS is the right way to go. I'll continue to plod ahead with the CMake effort, since it appears to be the wave of the future. I do appreciate the suggestion, though.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0

        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups
        • Search
        • Get Qt Extensions
        • Unsolved