uninitialized data passed to QStringList QCoreApplication::arguments()

[jsulm]

@rparon said in uninitialized data passed to QStringList QCoreApplication::arguments():

cv_new

What is it? Do you have custom memory management? Could the problem be related to that?

[rparon]

Hi JonB,
thank you for the comment, I understand your point of view , yes I am debugging the launch, the vars are passed correctly to QGuiApplication(argc, (char**) argv) but then there are many other lines of code... and finally the app calls QCoreApplication::arguments() passing wrong data... sure I could put memory breakpoints to inspect possible operations on these vars... but it would take a lot of time to do that and I hope there is a shorter solution... what I need is to make sure they are properly initialized (before the call from QCoreApplication::arguments() ...

[JonB]

@rparon said in uninitialized data passed to QStringList QCoreApplication::arguments():

what I need is to make sure they are properly initialized (before the call from QCoreApplication::arguments() ...

As I said, I do not know what this means. You need to show some minimal reproducible example. The code you showed should work e.g. if it's the main() of a program. If not you have done something wrong, perhaps after you called QGuiApplication(argc, (char**) argv) and before QGuiApplication::exec().

Do you change argc or argv? Very importantly, is your QGuiApplication::exec() really in the same function as the argv[] variable? If it's actually in a different function your code will crash. QCoreApplication::arguments() will get its answer from QGuiApplication's idea of the values you pass to it. If they have been corrupted you will lose. I don't see much of a shortcut to putting in a couple of breakpoints at judicious points, don't put in thousands just "divide and conquer" your code and refine depending where it goes wrong.

[rparon]

Hi jsulm,
it is standard memory management :

#define  cv_new new

as far as I know Qt should work without problems with that but I don't know if it may create problems with automatic initialization of vars.. (I don't know the details of QCore...)

[JonB]

@rparon
So "standard" that cv_new does not even show up in Google (other than as a username!)? What file is that in? Have you seen anyone else using cv_new in place of new?

Given that definition it is not germane to whatever your issue is.

[rparon]

Hi JonB,
yes, it is all the code in main {...} , note it is a dll but that should not create problems except maybe when catching signals from (in this case) Windows system... I confirm that argc, argv passed to QGuiApplication(argc, (char**) argv) do not change...
From your answers I presume there is not a public method to reset / clear / redefine these vars
I would think the vars argc, argv passed to QGuiApplication(..) are the same passed from Qt to QStringList QCoreApplication::arguments() ....
so the problem could be to identify where these are modified...

[jsulm]

@rparon You should really post a reproducer, so that others can take a look and also debug.
I really doubt it is a Qt issue, else no Qt app would work.

[JonB]

@rparon
Although you may really need a repro....
From your screenshot, can you please start by clicking the Show Call Stack and showing us (clearly) the stack, in case there is any useful clue there.

And what is the pppx.dll? Is that your DLL? The props.exe? Is that a main program of yours using the DLL?

In the screenshot the whole #if defined(Q_OS_WIN) is "dimmed", indicating to me that symbol is not defined. Yet since the error shows "DLL"s are you not on Windows?

[rparon]

Hi JonB,
thanks to C preprocessor, in that case cv_news is the same of new, but I understand your perplexity :-)
Yes, those are the names of the dll and executable.
About the Call Stack, sure, I attach the screenshot for your review....

[rparon]

Hi jsulm,
as you can judge from the code (that is the dll main) I adopt the standard procedures to work with Qt objects,
I wonder if I am not managing properly some initialization...

[JonB]

@rparon
FWIW: You claim you get the error during your result = qapp_pt->exec();. I think the call stack shows that is not the case and it dies during

QmlEngine->load(QUrl(QStringLiteral("qrc:/GuiModule/mydll/resource/Main.qml")));

What is the function ppx.dll!edS(int stream)?

Can you please print out QCoreApplication::arguments() immediately above that line in your code. Is it right at that point? If so I am unconvinced the argc, argv it is looking at have anything to do with your argc, argv here.

[rparon]

Hi JonB,
correct, the problem appears executing QmlEngine->load(....)
the function pppx.dll!edS(int stream) includes all the code to load Qt (see above)

int argc = 1;
const char* argv[] = {"MyDll"," "," "};
qapp_pt = cv_new QGuiApplication(argc, (char**) argv);
.......
result = qapp_pt->exec();

as far as I can see QCoreApplication::arguments() is not called before QmlEngine->load(QUrl...)....

[JonB]

@rparon said in uninitialized data passed to QStringList QCoreApplication::arguments():

as far as I can see QCoreApplication::arguments() is not called before QmlEngine->load(QUrl...)....

I asked you to paste

qDebug() << QCoreApplication::arguments();

into your code immediately above

QmlEngine->load(QUrl...)

[rparon]

Hi JonB,
I have included the direct call just before load()

QmlEngine = cv_new QQmlApplicationEngine();
if (QmlEngine == NULL)
   {
   return(result);
   }

// direct call to inspect argc, argv
QStringList c = QCoreApplication::arguments(); 

// run QMLEngine and load Main.qml,
// note that only upper case file names are exported by default	
QmlEngine->load(QUrl(QStringLiteral("qrc:/GuiModule/pppx/resource/Main.qml")));

indeed the var argc shows a wrong value : -6213....
now the area of investigation is somewhat restricted.... I'll try to go further calling the same just after

qapp_pt = cv_new QGuiApplication(argc, (char**) argv);

to see what is happening , could it be related with new operator ?

[rparon]

a trick that I am testing is to put the initializing argc, argv values

int argc = 1;
const char* argv[] = {"MyDll"," "," "};

as extern (equivalent to static)
this seems to solve the problem but I am surprised that Qt doesn't make an internal copy...
indeed I did assume that (the internal copy) and never presumed they must be static...
were you aware of that ?

[Kent-Dorfman]

@rparon said in uninitialized data passed to QStringList QCoreApplication::arguments():

a trick that I am testing is to put the initializing argc, argv values

int argc = 1;
const char* argv[] = {"MyDll"," "," "};

as extern (equivalent to static)
this seems to solve the problem but I am surprised that Qt doesn't make an internal copy...
indeed I did assume that (the internal copy) and never presumed they must be static...
were you aware of that ?

command line arguments are (from the perspective of the child) considered to be immutable, so I'm not aware of many apps that copy them, as why would you, unless you want to modify them?

[Christian Ehrlicher]

@rparon said in uninitialized data passed to QStringList QCoreApplication::arguments():

int argc = 1;

This is still wrong as you pass one parameter...

No reproducer, no fix of the obvious errors so no help from my side.

[Kent-Dorfman]

@Christian-Ehrlicher said in uninitialized data passed to QStringList QCoreApplication::arguments():

@rparon said in uninitialized data passed to QStringList QCoreApplication::arguments():

int argc = 1;

This is still wrong as you pass one parameter...

No reproducer, no fix of the obvious errors so no help from my side.

the "Willingness to help" argument aside, I'm curious about your problem with the argc assignment, from a purely technical point of view.

So what if the argv list is longer than one element. The argc is an arbitrary limit that must not be greater than the number of elements in the list, lest you access out of bound memory. Sure, it is "SUPPOSE" to be the actual length of the argv list but in the context of this test, does it matter?

[Christian Ehrlicher]

@Kent-Dorfman said in uninitialized data passed to QStringList QCoreApplication::arguments():

tual length of the argv list but in the context of this test, does it matter?

The first argument is always the executable name. And I doubt it's what the first arg here is. He wants a parameter or whatever. Otherwise why fiddle around with QCoreApplication::arguments?
but we just have to guess due to a missing reproduce.

[rparon]

I understand the different points of view, to clarify :

int argc = 1;
const char* argv[] = {"MyDll"," "," "};

is based on Qt documentation

argc must be greater than zero and argv must contain at least one valid character string, argc = 1 is a correct value.

Converting vars from local to global / extern seems to solve the problem