Signal slow for the first few times. (Pyqt5)

Igor86

i Just tried with Python 3.10.10 and pyqt5 5.15.10

same problem..

jeremy_k

PyQt's slot decorator is documented as reducing the amount of memory used and is slightly faster. I haven't attempted to verify the statement, but it looks like a cheap experiment to try.

Another experiment is to "prime" the worker thread by sending an unrelated signal to determine if the delay is related to the thread, the worker object, or the particular slot.

JonB · i Just tried with Python 3.10.10 and pyqt5 5.15.10

@Igor86
I agree with both of @jeremy_k's points to try.

Also, would you be prepared to give it a quick go using PySide2 (equivalent to PyQt5, so not PySide6 which is PyQt6)? Usually there is barely anything to change. If by chance PySide2 does not behave like this it would indicate a PyQt5 issue.

Igor86

@JonB thank you, i am trying the pyside option you posted, but i am having difficulties as i am getting this error: cannot import name 'uic' from 'PySide2'

any idea on what i have to do in this case? i am an occasional python progger and not experienced at all.. thank you

JonB

@Igor86 said in Signal slow for the first few times. (Pyqt5):

cannot import name 'uic' from 'PySide2'

Unfortunately that is to do with the one major difference between PyQt and PySide if you are using .ui file from Designer. I can't remember what you have to change, easy for you if you are a programmer but not if not and I don't use PyQt/PySide regularly to tell you, so you may have to leave this test. Unless a Python person wants to tell you what to alter....

Igor86

@jeremy_k @JonB the problem was solved by adding the @pyqtSlot decorator.

Thank you very much for your help!

jeremy_k

@Igor86 Thanks for running and reporting on the experiment.

JonB

@Igor86
Glad that sorted you out. I nearly suggested @pyqtslot but could not see from the description why that would make such an initial difference of several seconds, and still wonder now why that should be, but there you are.

Igor86

@JonB it looks like the problem is here again. but it was indeed away yesterday when i tested it several times.. the only differenche is that now i have enabled the hard disk lock in windows. so am going to investigate if that makes a difference.

JonB

@Igor86
Hmmm. I hope @pyqtslot does somehow work for you, just I wonder how it could possibly make a difference of seconds in your situation. I would wonder whether something else might be going on, as you say to do with first time reboot. In your output there is Got Crate ID between the emission and the receipt, so something else is going on in your code other than what you have shown?

"between 3 and 6 seconds" is an enormous delay in computer terms. I find it hard to believe that whatever @pyqtslot does it could cost so much without it. If, say, https://stackoverflow.com/a/45842186/489865 or https://stackoverflow.com/a/40330912/489865 or https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1123088/PyQt-signal-slot-connection-performance are right in their description I can't see how it would achieve that. To me it sounds more like: the slot will only print its output once the processor switches from the worker thread back to the main thread. If something on your system is "very busy" (hardware? memory paging?), first time after reboot, the OS may be unable to do that in a timely manner?