Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. Qt Creator and other tools
  4. Why is Qt Creator so terrible?
Qt 6.11 is out! See what's new in the release blog

Why is Qt Creator so terrible?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Qt Creator and other tools
11 Posts 8 Posters 3.5k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    UltimateOrb
    wrote on last edited by
    #2
    This post is deleted!
    JoeCFDJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U UltimateOrb

      This post is deleted!

      JoeCFDJ Offline
      JoeCFDJ Offline
      JoeCFD
      wrote on last edited by JoeCFD
      #3

      @UltimateOrb Do not complain too much since it is free. On Windows, you can try to use VS + Qt Plugin if you do not like Qt Creator. On Linux, I guess you do not have other better choices.

      If you have an issue, file a bug and Qt guys will fix it.

      U E 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      • JoeCFDJ JoeCFD

        @UltimateOrb Do not complain too much since it is free. On Windows, you can try to use VS + Qt Plugin if you do not like Qt Creator. On Linux, I guess you do not have other better choices.

        If you have an issue, file a bug and Qt guys will fix it.

        U Offline
        U Offline
        UltimateOrb
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        @JoeCFD A very strange position. Take a look at the capabilities of Android Studio. It's free. I'm disappointed in QT (((

        JoeCFDJ J.HilkJ 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • U UltimateOrb

          @JoeCFD A very strange position. Take a look at the capabilities of Android Studio. It's free. I'm disappointed in QT (((

          JoeCFDJ Offline
          JoeCFDJ Offline
          JoeCFD
          wrote on last edited by JoeCFD
          #5

          @UltimateOrb Google has many more resources than Qt to make Android Studio much better. However, Google does not have a nice package like Qt. Android is not great either.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • U UltimateOrb

            I'm just starting to program in QML. The documentation on the site is poor. It's not logical. QML Creator is similar to a simple text editor. For example:

            c862282d-e954-447a-9fc8-bf52073a8d58-image.png

            Why does the IDE offer me a Text object for gradient. It won't work. Where is the good "Code completion"? Why doesn't it check the type?

            1 Offline
            1 Offline
            1XU7
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            @UltimateOrb
            Qt creator si sweet, but ir You don't like ides, try vim, this a verte good choice, i use vim with no highlight no intellisense, no autocompletion,...

            Is perfect

            JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • 1 1XU7

              @UltimateOrb
              Qt creator si sweet, but ir You don't like ides, try vim, this a verte good choice, i use vim with no highlight no intellisense, no autocompletion,...

              Is perfect

              JonBJ Online
              JonBJ Online
              JonB
              wrote on last edited by JonB
              #7

              @1XU7 said in Why is Qt Creator so terrible?:

              i use vim with no highlight no intellisense, no autocompletion,...

              Probably not what the OP has in mind, judging by their posts ;-)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U UltimateOrb

                @JoeCFD A very strange position. Take a look at the capabilities of Android Studio. It's free. I'm disappointed in QT (((

                J.HilkJ Online
                J.HilkJ Online
                J.Hilk
                Moderators
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                @UltimateOrb no need to be disappointed. Keep in mind, QML is the QtCompanies very own mockup language. You can't just throw the clang code model at it and everything works out of the box.

                I think it's actually amazing in what QtCreator already can do as an editor with QML. Though some key features, like refactoring, are missing I imagine those are more difficult to implement than we may think.


                Be aware of the Qt Code of Conduct, when posting : https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct


                Q: What's that?
                A: It's blue light.
                Q: What does it do?
                A: It turns blue.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • leenamiettinenL Offline
                  leenamiettinenL Offline
                  leenamiettinen
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  @UltimateOrb We are working on supporting the QML Language Server (QMLLS), but it is still experimental: https://doc.qt.io/qtcreator/creator-language-servers.html#qml-language-server

                  After I turned it on as described in the docs , I do not get suggestions for the gradient value, unless I start adding the Gradient type. I agree that the code completion should be more helpful.

                  If you press F1 on the Rectangle type, you'll get help for it next to the editor, with an example on how to specify gradients.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • JoeCFDJ JoeCFD

                    @UltimateOrb Do not complain too much since it is free. On Windows, you can try to use VS + Qt Plugin if you do not like Qt Creator. On Linux, I guess you do not have other better choices.

                    If you have an issue, file a bug and Qt guys will fix it.

                    E Offline
                    E Offline
                    Enrico Trudu
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    @JoeCFD QtCreator can be free, but there is also a payable version. The non-free version is crappy and unreliable like the free one, as far as you know? Because I understand that it is a very complex software, but it mess with very simple things. And seems to me, searching through the forum, that the (apparently simplest) bugs cannot be solved, because cannot be replicated, most of the time. And this triggers a sense of FUD.

                    aha_1980A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • E Enrico Trudu

                      @JoeCFD QtCreator can be free, but there is also a payable version. The non-free version is crappy and unreliable like the free one, as far as you know? Because I understand that it is a very complex software, but it mess with very simple things. And seems to me, searching through the forum, that the (apparently simplest) bugs cannot be solved, because cannot be replicated, most of the time. And this triggers a sense of FUD.

                      aha_1980A Offline
                      aha_1980A Offline
                      aha_1980
                      Lifetime Qt Champion
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      @Enrico-Trudu Do you have any examples for your complaints?

                      And yes, fixing bugs that cannot be reproduced is nearly impossible. Therefore good reproducers are needed. Writing "why is everything to terrible" is no good report.

                      Regards

                      Qt has to stay free or it will die.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1

                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups
                      • Search
                      • Get Qt Extensions
                      • Unsolved