Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. Qt for Python
  4. TypeError with PySide 6.5.0 for multiple inheritance of MainWindow
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

TypeError with PySide 6.5.0 for multiple inheritance of MainWindow

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Qt for Python
28 Posts 5 Posters 8.7k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JonBJ JonB

    @StarterKit said in TypeError with PySide 6.5.0 for multiple inheritance of MainWindow:

    Finally I decided to encaplusate logging.Handler in my class and now I like it more than before :)

    That is indeed the best, but earlier you said

    But your handler should be a descendant of logging.Handler.

    Anyway, sounds good :)

    S Offline
    S Offline
    StarterKit
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @JonB said in TypeError with PySide 6.5.0 for multiple inheritance of MainWindow:

    That is indeed the best, but earlier you said

    I thought one more time about it and decided that there is a better desing option possible :) Not a big change but I moved 2 more methods inside my class and it looks good after all :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • J Offline
      J Offline
      jonton
      wrote on last edited by
      #19

      We have hit this issue too. PySide 6.5.0 appears to use the signature of the last super-class that is initialised for both of them. The example we have is:

          def __init__(self, rootDataModel, parent):
              super(QtCore.QObject, self).__init__(self)
              StateSource.__init__(self, parent, "model")
      

      This results in a runtime error of:

          QtCore.QObject.__init__(self)
      TypeError:__init__() missing 2 required positional arguments: 'parent' and 'name'
      

      If I reverse the order of initialisation to:

          def __init__(self, rootDataModel, parent):
              StateSource.__init__(self, parent, "model")
              super(QtCore.QObject, self).__init__(self)
      

      Then the error reports that the StateSource initialiser only should have a single parameter.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J jonton

        We have hit this issue too. PySide 6.5.0 appears to use the signature of the last super-class that is initialised for both of them. The example we have is:

            def __init__(self, rootDataModel, parent):
                super(QtCore.QObject, self).__init__(self)
                StateSource.__init__(self, parent, "model")
        

        This results in a runtime error of:

            QtCore.QObject.__init__(self)
        TypeError:__init__() missing 2 required positional arguments: 'parent' and 'name'
        

        If I reverse the order of initialisation to:

            def __init__(self, rootDataModel, parent):
                StateSource.__init__(self, parent, "model")
                super(QtCore.QObject, self).__init__(self)
        

        Then the error reports that the StateSource initialiser only should have a single parameter.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        jonton
        wrote on last edited by
        #20

        @jonton

        This makes me think it's a new bug that has been introduced into the handling of multiple inheritance in PySide.

        I don't know enough about the inner workings of PySide, perhaps someone on this forum can shed some light on it?

        JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J jonton

          @jonton

          This makes me think it's a new bug that has been introduced into the handling of multiple inheritance in PySide.

          I don't know enough about the inner workings of PySide, perhaps someone on this forum can shed some light on it?

          JonBJ Online
          JonBJ Online
          JonB
          wrote on last edited by
          #21

          @jonton
          There was some "fix" for 6.5.0/6.6.0 in https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/PYSIDE-2294, though I don't know what was "fixed" exactly.
          Have you read that one? Should you comment there?

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • JonBJ JonB

            @jonton
            There was some "fix" for 6.5.0/6.6.0 in https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/PYSIDE-2294, though I don't know what was "fixed" exactly.
            Have you read that one? Should you comment there?

            J Offline
            J Offline
            jonton
            wrote on last edited by
            #22

            Thanks @JonB

            That does sound like the same issue, but as you say it's not clear in the discussion whether there is actually a fix in 6.6.0 or not?

            I'll check in with them there.

            Cheers,

            Jon

            JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J jonton

              Thanks @JonB

              That does sound like the same issue, but as you say it's not clear in the discussion whether there is actually a fix in 6.6.0 or not?

              I'll check in with them there.

              Cheers,

              Jon

              JonBJ Online
              JonBJ Online
              JonB
              wrote on last edited by JonB
              #23

              @jonton
              It is deffo the same issue! :) It was reported against 6.4. I don't understand because I read it as it was "fixed" in both 6.5.0 & 6.6.0, whatever fixing in "both" means, but I think you are saying you are having a problem in 6.5. I don't know whether that is the original problem OR they did some fix for that which you have, but now you have/that has introduced a (new?) problem with your super() case.

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • JonBJ JonB

                @jonton
                It is deffo the same issue! :) It was reported against 6.4. I don't understand because I read it as it was "fixed" in both 6.5.0 & 6.6.0, whatever fixing in "both" means, but I think you are saying you are having a problem in 6.5. I don't know whether that is the original problem OR they did some fix for that which you have, but now you have/that has introduced a (new?) problem with your super() case.

                J Offline
                J Offline
                jonton
                wrote on last edited by jonton
                #24

                I'm certainly having the problem in 6.5.0, whereas the code works in 6.4.3 correctly.

                It looks like the change that came into 6.5.0 was this:

                https://github.com/pyside/pyside-setup/commit/e8095467f7d0332cc0987e7c541de9906e19fece

                And this has caused the regression?

                JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J jonton

                  I'm certainly having the problem in 6.5.0, whereas the code works in 6.4.3 correctly.

                  It looks like the change that came into 6.5.0 was this:

                  https://github.com/pyside/pyside-setup/commit/e8095467f7d0332cc0987e7c541de9906e19fece

                  And this has caused the regression?

                  JonBJ Online
                  JonBJ Online
                  JonB
                  wrote on last edited by JonB
                  #25

                  @jonton
                  I would not begin to know the implications of the changes you see.

                  It sounds like:

                  • There was a problem with multiple inheritance at 6.4 which they fixed at 6.5, or they just changed/improved it, per the changes.

                  • Now at 6.5 that may be fixed/improved, but other cases, such as yours and @StarterKit's, go wrong, where they used to be OK at 6.4.

                  I do not truly understand the discussion in https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/PYSIDE-2294 or what the conclusion was. You may need to post there, or raise a new issue.

                  One thing: I see you use super(QtCore.QObject, self).__init__(self) in both your cases. But @SGaist wrote

                  This is wrong, self shall not be part of the arguments passed to the function called when using super.
                  super().init(parent=parent)

                  So is not that the issue?

                  At this point I am passing here, as it's becoming a Python issue I am not sufficiently familiar with.

                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • JonBJ JonB

                    @jonton
                    I would not begin to know the implications of the changes you see.

                    It sounds like:

                    • There was a problem with multiple inheritance at 6.4 which they fixed at 6.5, or they just changed/improved it, per the changes.

                    • Now at 6.5 that may be fixed/improved, but other cases, such as yours and @StarterKit's, go wrong, where they used to be OK at 6.4.

                    I do not truly understand the discussion in https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/PYSIDE-2294 or what the conclusion was. You may need to post there, or raise a new issue.

                    One thing: I see you use super(QtCore.QObject, self).__init__(self) in both your cases. But @SGaist wrote

                    This is wrong, self shall not be part of the arguments passed to the function called when using super.
                    super().init(parent=parent)

                    So is not that the issue?

                    At this point I am passing here, as it's becoming a Python issue I am not sufficiently familiar with.

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    jonton
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    @JonB

                    Thanks for all the help with this, it's been invaluable. I found the root cause of our problem. The order that the base classes are inherited in affects the Method Resolution Order, which confuses the new system.

                    I think it points to an error in PySide 6.5.0, but I don't have enough knowledge of the inner workings of Python and PySide to make a call on this. I'll put a note on the issue page that you pointed to.

                    The PR to fix this in USD is here, which goes into an explanation of the issue:

                    https://github.com/PixarAnimationStudios/USD/pull/2392

                    JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • J jonton

                      @JonB

                      Thanks for all the help with this, it's been invaluable. I found the root cause of our problem. The order that the base classes are inherited in affects the Method Resolution Order, which confuses the new system.

                      I think it points to an error in PySide 6.5.0, but I don't have enough knowledge of the inner workings of Python and PySide to make a call on this. I'll put a note on the issue page that you pointed to.

                      The PR to fix this in USD is here, which goes into an explanation of the issue:

                      https://github.com/PixarAnimationStudios/USD/pull/2392

                      JonBJ Online
                      JonBJ Online
                      JonB
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      @jonton said in TypeError with PySide 6.5.0 for multiple inheritance of MainWindow:

                      I'll put a note on the issue page that you pointed to.

                      Please do so. I don't know whether they will say it is a 6.5.0 issue or whether they will say your code is wrong/the behaviour you see is correct.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S StarterKit

                        Hi all,
                        It appears I got a problem after PySide upgrade from 6.4.3 to 6.5.0.
                        Here is a minimal example - it does nothing special, just displays a window and a label in it. The structure of the code is similar to the one I use in real project where UI is created with help of Qt Designer generated files.
                        This code works fine with PySide 6.4.3, but with PySide 6.5.0 it raises an error.
                        The error:

                        window = MainWindow()
                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                        File "main.py", line 11, in __init__
                          QMainWindow.__init__(self, parent=None)
                        TypeError: object.__init__() takes exactly one argument (the instance to initialize)
                        

                        The code:

                        from PySide6.QtWidgets import QApplication, QMainWindow, QLabel
                        
                        class Ui_X_MainWindow(object):
                            def setupUi(self, MainWindow):
                                MainWindow.resize(400, 300)
                                self.lbl = QLabel(self)
                        
                        class MainWindow(QMainWindow, Ui_X_MainWindow):
                            def __init__(self):
                                QMainWindow.__init__(self, parent=None)
                                self.setupUi(self)
                                self.lbl.setText("XXX")
                        
                        app = QApplication([])
                        window = MainWindow()
                        window.show()
                        app.exec()
                        
                        Q Offline
                        Q Offline
                        qqiq
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #28

                        I have same problem. The problem for me is that the PySide6.5.0 I installed does not match the python version I used. My python version is 3.10, while the python version for installed PySide is 3.7 when using pip to install.

                        Collecting PySide6
                        Using cached PySide6-6.5.0-cp37-abi3-win_amd64.whl (7.2 kB)

                        No idea why it use 3.7

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Pl45m4P Pl45m4 referenced this topic on

                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups
                        • Search
                        • Get Qt Extensions
                        • Unsolved