Why new QT Creator is way much slow than it's previous versions?
-
I have been using QT Creator 4 and 5 but I recently installed QT Creator 6. I actually don't know the reasons and haven't seen any of these things. But This version feels so terrible to me. I used to run QT 5 on dual core and now I got ryzen 5 and twice the memory but it feels so much laggy. Auto completion takes more than 10 seconds and analyzer takes more amount. And there isn't much changes in overall experience over QT Creator 5.(this is not problem but why release simple changes as major version by this big company)
Are you all facing same thing or is it only me who is facing this?
-
@Thank-You said in Why new QT Creator is way much slow than it's previous versions?:
Are you all facing same thing or is it only me who is facing this?
Yes, there are a bug in QtC6 (related to the code auto completion which takes ~ x1.5-3 times more time for parsing). I don't remember that bug number.
-
@Thank-You hard to tell, really.
I remember being frustrated with the speed when I updated to the first version of QtCreator 6 being available, I had to alter some settings regarding autocompletion and adjust them. It was better. Currently I am using QtC 6.0.1, works like it should.
-
@Thank-You said in Why new QT Creator is way much slow than it's previous versions?:
@kuzulis
I am curious to know about code analyzer too. -
@kuzulis said in Why new QT Creator is way much slow than it's previous versions?:
@Thank-You said in Why new QT Creator is way much slow than it's previous versions?:
@kuzulis
I am curious to know about code analyzer too.
This appears to be related to the clang code model, correct? So I expect if one uses the "classical" code model this shouldn't be an issue (I just skimmed over the comments without reading them in detail)?
-
@kshegunov said in Why new QT Creator is way much slow than it's previous versions?:
This appears to be related to the clang code model, correct? So I expect if one uses the "classical" code model this shouldn't be an issue (I just skimmed over the comments without reading them in detail)?
I'm not sure, but, probably - yes.