Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. Constructor syntax in Qt in mainwindow.cpp
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Constructor syntax in Qt in mainwindow.cpp

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved General and Desktop
16 Posts 5 Posters 2.4k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Swati777999S Swati777999

    @jsulm I don't understand how the member variables are represented in the declaration of the constructor with commas.

    :QMainWindow(parent),
    name(0),
    place(0),
    thing(0),
    about(0)
    

    Generally, in C++ , any function is declared as
    void custom_func (arg1,arg2......argn)
    {
    ............
    }

    Please clarify the above syntax of Qt constructor declaration.

    JonBJ Online
    JonBJ Online
    JonB
    wrote on last edited by JonB
    #5

    @Swati777999 said in Constructor syntax in Qt in mainwindow.cpp:

    Generally, in C++ , any function is declared as
    void custom_func (arg1,arg2......argn)
    {

    This is a plain C function declaration. The example you are asking about is for a C++ class method, and inheriting from a base class.

    It does not declare the variables in the comma-list, it merely initializes them. They must be declared as class members, as @jsulm has shown. In this particular case it is just equivalent to:

     MainWindow::MainWindow(QWidget *parent)
     : QMainWindow(parent)
    {
         name = 0;
         place = 0;
         thing = 0;
         about = 0;
        ...
    }
    
    Swati777999S 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • Swati777999S Swati777999

      @jsulm I don't understand how the member variables are represented in the declaration of the constructor with commas.

      :QMainWindow(parent),
      name(0),
      place(0),
      thing(0),
      about(0)
      

      Generally, in C++ , any function is declared as
      void custom_func (arg1,arg2......argn)
      {
      ............
      }

      Please clarify the above syntax of Qt constructor declaration.

      KroMignonK Offline
      KroMignonK Offline
      KroMignon
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      @Swati777999 said in Constructor syntax in Qt in mainwindow.cpp:

      I don't understand how the member variables are represented in the declaration of the constructor with commas.

      As told by @jsulm : this is C++ basic knowledge: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/constructor

      As Qt is a C++ framework, it will really help you, and save from frustrations, to to first learn C++ basics.

      It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. (Sherlock Holmes)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jsulmJ jsulm

        @Swati777999 said in Constructor syntax in Qt in mainwindow.cpp:

        I don't understand how the member variables are represented in the declaration of the constructor with commas.

        Please learn C++! You are asking absolute basics!

        class SomeClass
        {
        public:
            SomeClass():
                a(1),
                b("Some String")
            {}
        private:
            int a;
            std::string b;
        };
        
        Swati777999S Offline
        Swati777999S Offline
        Swati777999
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        @jsulm I'm familiar with the private variables declaration in your code not with the function declared in the public section.

        I've taken up courses of C++ in one of my undergraduate curriculum but have never found the syntax of C++ function like this before. So, put this question.

        “ In order to be irreplaceable, one must always be different” – Coco Chanel

        KroMignonK jsulmJ 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • Swati777999S Swati777999

          @jsulm I'm familiar with the private variables declaration in your code not with the function declared in the public section.

          I've taken up courses of C++ in one of my undergraduate curriculum but have never found the syntax of C++ function like this before. So, put this question.

          KroMignonK Offline
          KroMignonK Offline
          KroMignon
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          @Swati777999 said in Constructor syntax in Qt in mainwindow.cpp:

          have never found the syntax of C++ function like this before

          Because this is not a function but a class constructor declaration.

          It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. (Sherlock Holmes)

          Swati777999S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Swati777999S Swati777999

            @jsulm I'm familiar with the private variables declaration in your code not with the function declared in the public section.

            I've taken up courses of C++ in one of my undergraduate curriculum but have never found the syntax of C++ function like this before. So, put this question.

            jsulmJ Offline
            jsulmJ Offline
            jsulm
            Lifetime Qt Champion
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            @Swati777999 said in Constructor syntax in Qt in mainwindow.cpp:

            syntax of C++ function like this before

            This syntax is only valid for C++ constructors, not normal functions/methods.
            A C++ course should actually cover this basic thing.
            Please follow the link provided by @KroMignon

            https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • JonBJ JonB

              @Swati777999 said in Constructor syntax in Qt in mainwindow.cpp:

              Generally, in C++ , any function is declared as
              void custom_func (arg1,arg2......argn)
              {

              This is a plain C function declaration. The example you are asking about is for a C++ class method, and inheriting from a base class.

              It does not declare the variables in the comma-list, it merely initializes them. They must be declared as class members, as @jsulm has shown. In this particular case it is just equivalent to:

               MainWindow::MainWindow(QWidget *parent)
               : QMainWindow(parent)
              {
                   name = 0;
                   place = 0;
                   thing = 0;
                   about = 0;
                  ...
              }
              
              Swati777999S Offline
              Swati777999S Offline
              Swati777999
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              @JonB Your syntax is what I had expected and seen many times before. This is how the variables are initialized.

              “ In order to be irreplaceable, one must always be different” – Coco Chanel

              jsulmJ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Swati777999S Swati777999

                @JonB Your syntax is what I had expected and seen many times before. This is how the variables are initialized.

                jsulmJ Offline
                jsulmJ Offline
                jsulm
                Lifetime Qt Champion
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                @Swati777999 said in Constructor syntax in Qt in mainwindow.cpp:

                This is how the variables are initialized.

                This is a possibility. But in proper C++ projects this is not the way members are initialised. Such code would not get approved in projects I work on unless there is really a need to do it this way.
                Correct way to initialise members is using the syntax you were asking about. So, I suggest you learn and use it. This is also nothing new, exists in C++ for ages already.

                https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • KroMignonK KroMignon

                  @Swati777999 said in Constructor syntax in Qt in mainwindow.cpp:

                  have never found the syntax of C++ function like this before

                  Because this is not a function but a class constructor declaration.

                  Swati777999S Offline
                  Swati777999S Offline
                  Swati777999
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  @KroMignon Precisely, a constructor is a member function of a class.

                  “ In order to be irreplaceable, one must always be different” – Coco Chanel

                  jsulmJ KroMignonK 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • Swati777999S Swati777999

                    @KroMignon Precisely, a constructor is a member function of a class.

                    jsulmJ Offline
                    jsulmJ Offline
                    jsulm
                    Lifetime Qt Champion
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    @Swati777999 said in Constructor syntax in Qt in mainwindow.cpp:

                    a constructor is a member function of a class

                    It is a special member function of a class

                    https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                    jsulmJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Swati777999S Swati777999

                      @KroMignon Precisely, a constructor is a member function of a class.

                      KroMignonK Offline
                      KroMignonK Offline
                      KroMignon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      @Swati777999 said in Constructor syntax in Qt in mainwindow.cpp:

                      Precisely, a constructor is a member function of a class.

                      I don't understand what your goal is?
                      You ask a question about very basic C++ syntax, for which you've got answer and pointer to C++ documentation to get more detailed explanation, but you don't seems to accept those responses.
                      Why?
                      Do I hurt you in any way?

                      It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. (Sherlock Holmes)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jsulmJ jsulm

                        @Swati777999 said in Constructor syntax in Qt in mainwindow.cpp:

                        a constructor is a member function of a class

                        It is a special member function of a class

                        jsulmJ Offline
                        jsulmJ Offline
                        jsulm
                        Lifetime Qt Champion
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        @jsulm Here an explanation why this specual syntax is better:

                        class A
                        {
                        public:
                            A() { std::cout << "A" << std::endl; }
                            A(int) { std::cout << "A(int)" << std::endl; }
                        };
                        
                        class B
                        {
                        public:
                            B() { a = A(1); }
                        
                        private:
                            A a;
                        };
                        
                        B b;
                        

                        In the above code you will see that both A constructors are called, even though you are creating only one A instance explicetly. Reason is that members are initialised for you if you don't do it explicetly. In this case a is initialised using default constructor first, but then you create a new one using the other constructor and assign it to a.
                        If you change

                        B() { a = A(1); }
                        

                        to

                        B()
                            : a(1)
                        {  }
                        

                        you will see that only one constructor is called. So, it is more efficient to use the special constructor syntax.

                        https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • jsulmJ jsulm

                          @jsulm Here an explanation why this specual syntax is better:

                          class A
                          {
                          public:
                              A() { std::cout << "A" << std::endl; }
                              A(int) { std::cout << "A(int)" << std::endl; }
                          };
                          
                          class B
                          {
                          public:
                              B() { a = A(1); }
                          
                          private:
                              A a;
                          };
                          
                          B b;
                          

                          In the above code you will see that both A constructors are called, even though you are creating only one A instance explicetly. Reason is that members are initialised for you if you don't do it explicetly. In this case a is initialised using default constructor first, but then you create a new one using the other constructor and assign it to a.
                          If you change

                          B() { a = A(1); }
                          

                          to

                          B()
                              : a(1)
                          {  }
                          

                          you will see that only one constructor is called. So, it is more efficient to use the special constructor syntax.

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          mpergand
                          wrote on last edited by mpergand
                          #16

                          To go along with @jsulm
                          With const and reference variables, using the initializer list is mandatory.

                          class B
                          {
                          public:
                              B() 
                                  { 
                                  a = A(1);
                                  str="hello";  // error
                                  }
                          
                          private:
                              A a;
                              const string str;
                          };
                          

                          Funny enough, that way you can initialize a const var two times !

                          class B
                          {
                          public:
                              B() : str("hello2") 
                                  { 
                                  a = A(1);
                          
                                  }
                          
                          private:
                              A a;
                              const string str="hello";  // since  c++11
                          };
                          
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          3

                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups
                          • Search
                          • Get Qt Extensions
                          • Unsolved