Is Qt for webassembly die?
-
@lorn-potter said in Is Qt for webassembly die?:
Having to register an account for the convenience of getting to download ready made binaries, when the source code is available to use is hardly a good reason to be mad, IMHO. I dunno, seemed much ado about nothing.
Your eyes are blinded, many developers got pissed off by this stupid decisions. They cancel this action in 2015 because many developers don't like it, today they do it again, for me, this sound like the company is going to bankrupt soon, that is why they are so desperately to collect data of the users in order to sell the company with higher prices. Don't forget this company do not earn a penny in last few years. I repeat, how could a framework develop to ease the pain of developers sells well when the managers of the company are so damn arrogant, refuse to listen to the voices, the real need of the developers? They should fail.
What trick? I offered proof that widgets are in fact, being worked on.
I am not an idiot, other developers not idiots either. We all know Qt company do not intent to put much efforts into QWidget long time ago, compare with qml and QtQuick. It is still maintaining and sometimes with some small features added, that is all.
You know what I am trying to talk, stop your trick, unless you are trying to fool idiots.
@tham Please stop talking this way!
We want to have a forum with civilised discussions.
Read https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conductAlso, this is user forum, if you want to discuss this topic with QtCompany then please contact the company.
-
@tham Please stop talking this way!
We want to have a forum with civilised discussions.
Read https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conductAlso, this is user forum, if you want to discuss this topic with QtCompany then please contact the company.
@jsulm said in Is Qt for webassembly die?:
Also, this is user forum, if you want to discuss this topic with QtCompany then please contact the company.
Hahahaha, you think those arrogant managers really care about the feeling of developers? They only care about money, and trying their best to kill Qt, now KDE already infected by the "virus" spread by Qt company.
They will erase the posts they don't like, just check out this page. This company deserve to die, the sooner the better.
-
@jsulm said in Is Qt for webassembly die?:
Also, this is user forum, if you want to discuss this topic with QtCompany then please contact the company.
Hahahaha, you think those arrogant managers really care about the feeling of developers? They only care about money, and trying their best to kill Qt, now KDE already infected by the "virus" spread by Qt company.
They will erase the posts they don't like, just check out this page. This company deserve to die, the sooner the better.
@tham said in Is Qt for webassembly die?:
@jsulm said in Is Qt for webassembly die?:
Also, this is user forum, if you want to discuss this topic with QtCompany then please contact the company.
Hahahaha, you think those arrogant managers really care about the feeling of developers? They only care about money, and trying their best to kill Qt, now KDE already infected by the "virus" spread by Qt company.
They will erase the posts they don't like, just check out this page. This company deserve to die, the sooner the better.
They don't do it on this forum at least, that I can assure you of.
We all know Qt company do not intent to put much efforts into QWidget long time ago, compare with qml and QtQuick. It is still maintaining and sometimes with some small features added, that is all.
Yes that even described in official module statuses: QtWidgets module is done. It only receives small updates and bug fixes - but there are no plans to deprecate or remove it. And besides, amount of "efforts" put into QML is not that big nowadays. Check out the changelogs, it's mostly bug fixes and small additions.
Anyway, your question was about future of Qt WebAssembly, and Lorn has answered that it's not dying. It may not be receiving enough attention in your view (in mine too), but it's not getting deprecated.
(Z(:^
-
@tham said in Is Qt for webassembly die?:
@jsulm said in Is Qt for webassembly die?:
Also, this is user forum, if you want to discuss this topic with QtCompany then please contact the company.
Hahahaha, you think those arrogant managers really care about the feeling of developers? They only care about money, and trying their best to kill Qt, now KDE already infected by the "virus" spread by Qt company.
They will erase the posts they don't like, just check out this page. This company deserve to die, the sooner the better.
They don't do it on this forum at least, that I can assure you of.
We all know Qt company do not intent to put much efforts into QWidget long time ago, compare with qml and QtQuick. It is still maintaining and sometimes with some small features added, that is all.
Yes that even described in official module statuses: QtWidgets module is done. It only receives small updates and bug fixes - but there are no plans to deprecate or remove it. And besides, amount of "efforts" put into QML is not that big nowadays. Check out the changelogs, it's mostly bug fixes and small additions.
Anyway, your question was about future of Qt WebAssembly, and Lorn has answered that it's not dying. It may not be receiving enough attention in your view (in mine too), but it's not getting deprecated.
@sierdzio said in Is Qt for webassembly die?:
Anyway, your question was about future of Qt WebAssembly, and Lorn has answered that it's not dying. It may not be receiving enough attention in your view (in mine too), but it's not getting deprecated.
Ok, I knew this already, just get upset by the lie, if Qt company don't stop their nonsense, a fork of Qt may happen, and I will be happy to contribute to the project if that really happen. TQtC deserve to die, the sooner the better
-
@sierdzio said in Is Qt for webassembly die?:
Anyway, your question was about future of Qt WebAssembly, and Lorn has answered that it's not dying. It may not be receiving enough attention in your view (in mine too), but it's not getting deprecated.
Ok, I knew this already, just get upset by the lie, if Qt company don't stop their nonsense, a fork of Qt may happen, and I will be happy to contribute to the project if that really happen. TQtC deserve to die, the sooner the better
@tham said in Is Qt for webassembly die?:
Ok, I knew this already, just get upset by the lie, if Qt company don't stop their nonsense, a fork of Qt may happen, and I will be happy to contribute to the project if that really happen. TQtC deserve to die, the sooner the better
No one has lied to you. If you do not like using Qt, then go away and stop trolling here.
Freelance Software Engineer, Platform Maintainer QtWebAssembly, Maintainer QtSensors
Author, Hands-On Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5 http://bit.ly/HandsOnMobileEmbedded -
@tham said in Is Qt for webassembly die?:
Ok, I knew this already, just get upset by the lie, if Qt company don't stop their nonsense, a fork of Qt may happen, and I will be happy to contribute to the project if that really happen. TQtC deserve to die, the sooner the better
No one has lied to you. If you do not like using Qt, then go away and stop trolling here.
@lorn-potter said in Is Qt for webassembly die?:
@tham said in Is Qt for webassembly die?:
Ok, I knew this already, just get upset by the lie, if Qt company don't stop their nonsense, a fork of Qt may happen, and I will be happy to contribute to the project if that really happen. TQtC deserve to die, the sooner the better
No one has lied to you. If you do not like using Qt, then go away and stop trolling here.
If you want to help Qt company kill Qt, then go away and stop trolling here. Qt company is tearing apart the communities, it is the devil which killing the project, I like Qt but not their strategy.
-
@tham said in Is Qt for webassembly die?:
Ok, I knew this already, just get upset by the lie, if Qt company don't stop their nonsense, a fork of Qt may happen, and I will be happy to contribute to the project if that really happen. TQtC deserve to die, the sooner the better
No one has lied to you. If you do not like using Qt, then go away and stop trolling here.
-
@lorn-potter Are you happy for Qt company to tear up the community? I bet you are, keep trolling, Qt company, I will be very happy to see this company died
@tham Please stop with personal attacks! We are here a community of volunteers and most of us are not working for QtCompany (most probably @lorn-potter is also not working for QtCompany). Please read and follow https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct
-
As the discussion is getting rude here, let's close this topic for good.
