Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak

[KroMignon]

@sitesv said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

Made a simple test:

You are aware that doing so (subclassing QThread and redefining slot run()), there will be not QEventLoop to handle signals/slots for all QObjects running in this thread?
For example QTimer::singleShot() will not work.

[JonB]

@sitesv
In addition, from @KroMignon no QEventLoop also means no deleting/disposing/freeing of Qt objects.

On a side note: nothing to do with your findings, but for the record

 arguments << "127.0.0.1" << "-c 1";

is wrong: -c & 1 are separate arguments, it ought to be << "-c" << "1". You are lucky it works as one argument.

[sitesv]

@KroMignon @JonB
Are there any methods to do this correctly?
If I do this in the main thread: the app will freeze while QProcess execution - this is unacceptable for me.

[KroMignon]

@sitesv said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

Are there any methods to do this correctly?

I don't say this is incorrect.
I depends what you want to achieve.
If you don't need an event queue, it works. If you are using signals/slots, this will not work.

I do not know what is the purpose of this code extract, so maybe it is the best way to do.

[sitesv]

@KroMignon said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

If you don't need an event queue, it works. If you are using signals/slots, this will not work.

I don't know, but from this qthread in my main app I emit signal... and it is emitted... slot is from the main thread. QThread starts by start() method.
The problem for me is memory leak only.

[sitesv]

@JonB said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

In addition, from @KroMignon no QEventLoop also means no deleting/disposing/freeing of Qt objects.

QCoreApplication::processEvents would help?

@JonB said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

is wrong: -c & 1 are separate arguments, it ought to be << "-c" << "1". You are lucky it works as one argument.

Thank you! Fixed.

[KroMignon]

@sitesv said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

I don't know, but from this qthread in my main app I emit signal... and it is emitted... slot is from the main thread. QThread starts by start() method.
The problem for me is memory leak only.

For my comprehension of QObject and QThread (cf Threads and QObjects), your implementation is not really Qt friendly.

If I right understand what you want to achieve: you want to run "ping" a regular interval and be informed when ping has failed.

To do this, I would create a QObject class which handles the ping requests and eventually moves this class instance to a dedicated thread to avoid lock on main thread.

Something like:

class PingTester : public QObject
{
    Q_OBJECT

public:
    explicit PingTester(QObject* parent = nullptr): QObject(parent), m_timer(new QTimer(this))
    {
        m_timer->setInterval(30*1000); // per default 30 seconds
        m_timer->setSingleShot(false);
        connect(m_timer, &QTimer::timeout, this, &PingTester::doPing);
    }

    void setInterval(int interval) { m_timer->setInterval(interval); }

public slots:
     void start()
     {
         if(QThread::currentThrea() != thread())
         {
              QTimer::singleShot(this, 0, &PingTester::start);
              return;
         }
         if(!m_timer->isActive())
             m_timer->start();
     }
     void stop()
     {
         if(QThread::currentThrea() != thread())
         {
              QTimer::singleShot(this, 0, &PingTester::stop);
              return;
         }
         if(m_timer->isActive())
             m_timer->stop();
     }
     
private slots:
    void doPing();

signals:
    void pingFailure();
    void pingSuccess();

private:
     QTimer* m_timer;
};

[SGaist]

Hi,

Can you explain why exactly do you need that ping ?

[sitesv]

@SGaist
ping needs to check the availability of pc from the internal network. I thought that this is the simplest way to do this.

[Christian Ehrlicher]

But why a thread then?

[sitesv]

@KroMignon Thank you for your variant.
I have some Qs;
Why you are using QTimer for this purpose?
doPing() is represents my code with using QProcess?
This class should create in the main thread?

[sitesv]

@Christian-Ehrlicher said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

But why a thread then?

I need to check availability constantly during the program. I thought the QThread is a good way to do this...

[Christian Ehrlicher]

QProcess is asynchronous.

[sitesv]

@Christian-Ehrlicher said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

QProcess is asynchronous.

"waitForFinished" is not help?

[Christian Ehrlicher]

@sitesv said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

"waitForFinished" is not help?

Why do you want to make a asynchronous object blocking? Please read the QProcess docs and use the proper signals.

[SGaist]

The thing is: you just ping in the void, you do not even do anything with that information so why even ping ?

[sitesv]

@SGaist said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

The thing is: you just ping in the void, you do not even do anything with that information so why even ping ?

I just skipped this code, it is unimportant... It receives an answer, analyzes it, and emits a signal to the main thread. And this is works.

[JonB]

@sitesv
As @Christian-Ehrlicher has said. You are using this thread to run a QProcess, and you call waitForFinished() on it. You would be better just running QProcess asynchronously from your main thread, and acting on signals. Then perhaps any thread memory issue will go away.

[sitesv]

@JonB
I will try it.

[SGaist]

@sitesv said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

@SGaist said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

The thing is: you just ping in the void, you do not even do anything with that information so why even ping ?

I just skipped this code, it is unimportant... It receives an answer, analyzes it, and emits a signal to the main thread. And this is works.

Well, do not skip that kind of details when asking questions, it can hide the issue you are asking help for and it does not allow people to understand what is really happening.