Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak
Forum Update on Monday, May 27th 2025

Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved General and Desktop
79 Posts 7 Posters 18.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sitesvS sitesv

    @mrjj
    If I would use this code in while(1) of the 'main' function of the console app - there is NO memory leak.

    mrjjM Offline
    mrjjM Offline
    mrjj
    Lifetime Qt Champion
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @sitesv
    but you only create the thread once , so it should be the same ?

    sitesvS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mrjjM mrjj

      @sitesv
      but you only create the thread once , so it should be the same ?

      sitesvS Offline
      sitesvS Offline
      sitesv
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      @mrjj said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

      but you only create the thread once ,

      Yes.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mrjjM Offline
        mrjjM Offline
        mrjj
        Lifetime Qt Champion
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Hi
        Hmm really strange then.
        Is this on windows ?
        I did something similar on linux and didnt notice it would leak 4K

        sitesvS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sitesvS sitesv

          @mrjj said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

          Hi
          How do you know there is a leak ?

          By system monitor...
          A leak is about 4k/sec. I have been checking for a few minutes...

          Christian EhrlicherC Offline
          Christian EhrlicherC Offline
          Christian Ehrlicher
          Lifetime Qt Champion
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          @sitesv said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

          By system monitor...

          This is no valid memory leak checker. Use a correct to to find leaks like e.g. valgrind.

          Qt Online Installer direct download: https://download.qt.io/official_releases/online_installers/
          Visit the Qt Academy at https://academy.qt.io/catalog

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • mrjjM mrjj

            Hi
            Hmm really strange then.
            Is this on windows ?
            I did something similar on linux and didnt notice it would leak 4K

            sitesvS Offline
            sitesvS Offline
            sitesv
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            @mrjj said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

            Is this on windows ?

            Linux

            @Christian-Ehrlicher
            Is it correct, If a memory value is increasing for a few minutes?

            Christian EhrlicherC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sitesvS sitesv

              @mrjj said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

              Is this on windows ?

              Linux

              @Christian-Ehrlicher
              Is it correct, If a memory value is increasing for a few minutes?

              Christian EhrlicherC Offline
              Christian EhrlicherC Offline
              Christian Ehrlicher
              Lifetime Qt Champion
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              @sitesv A system monitor is not a valid tool for such an investigation. It may be a hint that there is something wrong but nothing more. The system monitor only shows what the OS gave the process, but the OS may not free resources immediately but only when it needs it later on so use a correct tool for this.

              Qt Online Installer direct download: https://download.qt.io/official_releases/online_installers/
              Visit the Qt Academy at https://academy.qt.io/catalog

              sitesvS 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • Christian EhrlicherC Christian Ehrlicher

                @sitesv A system monitor is not a valid tool for such an investigation. It may be a hint that there is something wrong but nothing more. The system monitor only shows what the OS gave the process, but the OS may not free resources immediately but only when it needs it later on so use a correct tool for this.

                sitesvS Offline
                sitesvS Offline
                sitesv
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                @Christian-Ehrlicher
                Checked app by Valgrind. There is no memory leak...
                Thank you. I hope there really are no errors.

                mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • sitesvS sitesv

                  @Christian-Ehrlicher
                  Checked app by Valgrind. There is no memory leak...
                  Thank you. I hope there really are no errors.

                  mrjjM Offline
                  mrjjM Offline
                  mrjj
                  Lifetime Qt Champion
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  @sitesv
                  I would leave it running for like 48 hours and see it would stabilize.
                  If its related to actually running the process on Os level, it might only allocate up to some max.

                  sitesvS 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • Christian EhrlicherC Offline
                    Christian EhrlicherC Offline
                    Christian Ehrlicher
                    Lifetime Qt Champion
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    Since Qt cleans up a lot of stuff during exit maybe also stop the application started with valgrind with CTRL+C and take a look at the reachable memory in the valgrind output to see if there is something interesting (start valgrind with '--show-reachable=yes')

                    Qt Online Installer direct download: https://download.qt.io/official_releases/online_installers/
                    Visit the Qt Academy at https://academy.qt.io/catalog

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • mrjjM mrjj

                      @sitesv
                      I would leave it running for like 48 hours and see it would stabilize.
                      If its related to actually running the process on Os level, it might only allocate up to some max.

                      sitesvS Offline
                      sitesvS Offline
                      sitesv
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      @mrjj, @Christian-Ehrlicher
                      Thank you!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sitesvS Offline
                        sitesvS Offline
                        sitesv
                        wrote on last edited by sitesv
                        #17

                        Hi!
                        Made a simple test:

                        void mythread::run(){
                            while(work){
                                bool boolRESULT;
                                QString output_str;
                                QByteArray output;
                                QStringList output_strlst;
                                QTextCodec *codec;
                                QString exe_path = "/bin/ping";;
                                QStringList arguments;
                                arguments << "127.0.0.1" << "-c" << "1";
                        
                                if(myProcess == nullptr) myProcess = new QProcess;
                                myProcess->start(exe_path, arguments);
                                myProcess->waitForFinished(500);
                        
                                output = myProcess->readAll();
                                output_str = codec->toUnicode(output);
                                output_strlst = output_str.split("\r\n");
                        
                                myProcess->close();
                                 
                                boolRESULT = false;
                                for (int i = 0; i < output_strlst.count(); i++){
                                    boolRESULT = output_strlst[i].contains("ttl",Qt::CaseInsensitive);
                                    if (boolRESULT) break;
                                }
                                emit setStatus(boolRESULT);
                           
                                msleep(1000);
                            }
                        }
                        

                        Valgrind output:
                        ...
                        ==23633== 2,400 bytes in 15 blocks are still reachable in loss record 2,049 of 2,114
                        ==23633== at 0x4C2BBEF: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
                        ==23633== by 0x6267251: resizeSignalVector (qobject_p.h:297)
                        ==23633== by 0x6267251: QObjectPrivate::addConnection(int, QObjectPrivate::Connection*) (qobject.cpp:330)
                        ==23633== by 0x6268A18: QMetaObjectPrivate::connect(QObject const*, int, QMetaObject const*, QObject const*, int, QMetaObject const*, int, int*) (qobject.cpp:3453)
                        ==23633== by 0x626FD58: QObject::connect(QObject const*, char const*, QObject const*, char const*, Qt::ConnectionType) (qobject.cpp:2911)
                        ==23633== by 0x61BFB1F: QProcessPrivate::startProcess() (qprocess_unix.cpp:384)
                        ==23633== by 0x61BA34D: QProcessPrivate::start(QFlagsQIODevice::OpenModeFlag) (qprocess.cpp:2246)
                        ==23633== by 0x61BA582: QProcess::start(QString const&, QStringList const&, QFlagsQIODevice::OpenModeFlag) (qprocess.cpp:2094)
                        ==23633== by 0x10BBBF: mythread::run() (mythread.cpp:19)

                        ==23633== by 0x605A3B4: QThreadPrivate::start(void*) (qthread_unix.cpp:342)
                        ==23633== by 0x6A164A3: start_thread (pthread_create.c:456)
                        ==23633== by 0x75B1D0E: clone (clone.S:97)
                        ...

                        mythread.cpp 19 line is:

                        myProcess->start(exe_path, arguments);
                        

                        My log by system monitor:

                        • 16:50 4300 KB
                        • 17:06 4790 KB
                        • 17:20 5200 KB
                        • 17:30 5552 KB

                        Any ideas?

                        KroMignonK JonBJ 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • sitesvS sitesv

                          Hi!
                          Made a simple test:

                          void mythread::run(){
                              while(work){
                                  bool boolRESULT;
                                  QString output_str;
                                  QByteArray output;
                                  QStringList output_strlst;
                                  QTextCodec *codec;
                                  QString exe_path = "/bin/ping";;
                                  QStringList arguments;
                                  arguments << "127.0.0.1" << "-c" << "1";
                          
                                  if(myProcess == nullptr) myProcess = new QProcess;
                                  myProcess->start(exe_path, arguments);
                                  myProcess->waitForFinished(500);
                          
                                  output = myProcess->readAll();
                                  output_str = codec->toUnicode(output);
                                  output_strlst = output_str.split("\r\n");
                          
                                  myProcess->close();
                                   
                                  boolRESULT = false;
                                  for (int i = 0; i < output_strlst.count(); i++){
                                      boolRESULT = output_strlst[i].contains("ttl",Qt::CaseInsensitive);
                                      if (boolRESULT) break;
                                  }
                                  emit setStatus(boolRESULT);
                             
                                  msleep(1000);
                              }
                          }
                          

                          Valgrind output:
                          ...
                          ==23633== 2,400 bytes in 15 blocks are still reachable in loss record 2,049 of 2,114
                          ==23633== at 0x4C2BBEF: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
                          ==23633== by 0x6267251: resizeSignalVector (qobject_p.h:297)
                          ==23633== by 0x6267251: QObjectPrivate::addConnection(int, QObjectPrivate::Connection*) (qobject.cpp:330)
                          ==23633== by 0x6268A18: QMetaObjectPrivate::connect(QObject const*, int, QMetaObject const*, QObject const*, int, QMetaObject const*, int, int*) (qobject.cpp:3453)
                          ==23633== by 0x626FD58: QObject::connect(QObject const*, char const*, QObject const*, char const*, Qt::ConnectionType) (qobject.cpp:2911)
                          ==23633== by 0x61BFB1F: QProcessPrivate::startProcess() (qprocess_unix.cpp:384)
                          ==23633== by 0x61BA34D: QProcessPrivate::start(QFlagsQIODevice::OpenModeFlag) (qprocess.cpp:2246)
                          ==23633== by 0x61BA582: QProcess::start(QString const&, QStringList const&, QFlagsQIODevice::OpenModeFlag) (qprocess.cpp:2094)
                          ==23633== by 0x10BBBF: mythread::run() (mythread.cpp:19)

                          ==23633== by 0x605A3B4: QThreadPrivate::start(void*) (qthread_unix.cpp:342)
                          ==23633== by 0x6A164A3: start_thread (pthread_create.c:456)
                          ==23633== by 0x75B1D0E: clone (clone.S:97)
                          ...

                          mythread.cpp 19 line is:

                          myProcess->start(exe_path, arguments);
                          

                          My log by system monitor:

                          • 16:50 4300 KB
                          • 17:06 4790 KB
                          • 17:20 5200 KB
                          • 17:30 5552 KB

                          Any ideas?

                          KroMignonK Offline
                          KroMignonK Offline
                          KroMignon
                          wrote on last edited by KroMignon
                          #18

                          @sitesv said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

                          Made a simple test:

                          You are aware that doing so (subclassing QThread and redefining slot run()), there will be not QEventLoop to handle signals/slots for all QObjects running in this thread?
                          For example QTimer::singleShot() will not work.

                          It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. (Sherlock Holmes)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • sitesvS sitesv

                            Hi!
                            Made a simple test:

                            void mythread::run(){
                                while(work){
                                    bool boolRESULT;
                                    QString output_str;
                                    QByteArray output;
                                    QStringList output_strlst;
                                    QTextCodec *codec;
                                    QString exe_path = "/bin/ping";;
                                    QStringList arguments;
                                    arguments << "127.0.0.1" << "-c" << "1";
                            
                                    if(myProcess == nullptr) myProcess = new QProcess;
                                    myProcess->start(exe_path, arguments);
                                    myProcess->waitForFinished(500);
                            
                                    output = myProcess->readAll();
                                    output_str = codec->toUnicode(output);
                                    output_strlst = output_str.split("\r\n");
                            
                                    myProcess->close();
                                     
                                    boolRESULT = false;
                                    for (int i = 0; i < output_strlst.count(); i++){
                                        boolRESULT = output_strlst[i].contains("ttl",Qt::CaseInsensitive);
                                        if (boolRESULT) break;
                                    }
                                    emit setStatus(boolRESULT);
                               
                                    msleep(1000);
                                }
                            }
                            

                            Valgrind output:
                            ...
                            ==23633== 2,400 bytes in 15 blocks are still reachable in loss record 2,049 of 2,114
                            ==23633== at 0x4C2BBEF: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
                            ==23633== by 0x6267251: resizeSignalVector (qobject_p.h:297)
                            ==23633== by 0x6267251: QObjectPrivate::addConnection(int, QObjectPrivate::Connection*) (qobject.cpp:330)
                            ==23633== by 0x6268A18: QMetaObjectPrivate::connect(QObject const*, int, QMetaObject const*, QObject const*, int, QMetaObject const*, int, int*) (qobject.cpp:3453)
                            ==23633== by 0x626FD58: QObject::connect(QObject const*, char const*, QObject const*, char const*, Qt::ConnectionType) (qobject.cpp:2911)
                            ==23633== by 0x61BFB1F: QProcessPrivate::startProcess() (qprocess_unix.cpp:384)
                            ==23633== by 0x61BA34D: QProcessPrivate::start(QFlagsQIODevice::OpenModeFlag) (qprocess.cpp:2246)
                            ==23633== by 0x61BA582: QProcess::start(QString const&, QStringList const&, QFlagsQIODevice::OpenModeFlag) (qprocess.cpp:2094)
                            ==23633== by 0x10BBBF: mythread::run() (mythread.cpp:19)

                            ==23633== by 0x605A3B4: QThreadPrivate::start(void*) (qthread_unix.cpp:342)
                            ==23633== by 0x6A164A3: start_thread (pthread_create.c:456)
                            ==23633== by 0x75B1D0E: clone (clone.S:97)
                            ...

                            mythread.cpp 19 line is:

                            myProcess->start(exe_path, arguments);
                            

                            My log by system monitor:

                            • 16:50 4300 KB
                            • 17:06 4790 KB
                            • 17:20 5200 KB
                            • 17:30 5552 KB

                            Any ideas?

                            JonBJ Offline
                            JonBJ Offline
                            JonB
                            wrote on last edited by JonB
                            #19

                            @sitesv
                            In addition, from @KroMignon no QEventLoop also means no deleting/disposing/freeing of Qt objects.

                            On a side note: nothing to do with your findings, but for the record

                             arguments << "127.0.0.1" << "-c 1";
                            

                            is wrong: -c & 1 are separate arguments, it ought to be << "-c" << "1". You are lucky it works as one argument.

                            sitesvS 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • sitesvS Offline
                              sitesvS Offline
                              sitesv
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              @KroMignon @JonB
                              Are there any methods to do this correctly?
                              If I do this in the main thread: the app will freeze while QProcess execution - this is unacceptable for me.

                              KroMignonK 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • sitesvS sitesv

                                @KroMignon @JonB
                                Are there any methods to do this correctly?
                                If I do this in the main thread: the app will freeze while QProcess execution - this is unacceptable for me.

                                KroMignonK Offline
                                KroMignonK Offline
                                KroMignon
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                @sitesv said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

                                Are there any methods to do this correctly?

                                I don't say this is incorrect.
                                I depends what you want to achieve.
                                If you don't need an event queue, it works. If you are using signals/slots, this will not work.

                                I do not know what is the purpose of this code extract, so maybe it is the best way to do.

                                It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. (Sherlock Holmes)

                                sitesvS 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • KroMignonK KroMignon

                                  @sitesv said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

                                  Are there any methods to do this correctly?

                                  I don't say this is incorrect.
                                  I depends what you want to achieve.
                                  If you don't need an event queue, it works. If you are using signals/slots, this will not work.

                                  I do not know what is the purpose of this code extract, so maybe it is the best way to do.

                                  sitesvS Offline
                                  sitesvS Offline
                                  sitesv
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  @KroMignon said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

                                  If you don't need an event queue, it works. If you are using signals/slots, this will not work.

                                  I don't know, but from this qthread in my main app I emit signal... and it is emitted... slot is from the main thread. QThread starts by start() method.
                                  The problem for me is memory leak only.

                                  KroMignonK 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • JonBJ JonB

                                    @sitesv
                                    In addition, from @KroMignon no QEventLoop also means no deleting/disposing/freeing of Qt objects.

                                    On a side note: nothing to do with your findings, but for the record

                                     arguments << "127.0.0.1" << "-c 1";
                                    

                                    is wrong: -c & 1 are separate arguments, it ought to be << "-c" << "1". You are lucky it works as one argument.

                                    sitesvS Offline
                                    sitesvS Offline
                                    sitesv
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    @JonB said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

                                    In addition, from @KroMignon no QEventLoop also means no deleting/disposing/freeing of Qt objects.

                                    QCoreApplication::processEvents would help?

                                    @JonB said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

                                    is wrong: -c & 1 are separate arguments, it ought to be << "-c" << "1". You are lucky it works as one argument.

                                    Thank you! Fixed.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • sitesvS sitesv

                                      @KroMignon said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

                                      If you don't need an event queue, it works. If you are using signals/slots, this will not work.

                                      I don't know, but from this qthread in my main app I emit signal... and it is emitted... slot is from the main thread. QThread starts by start() method.
                                      The problem for me is memory leak only.

                                      KroMignonK Offline
                                      KroMignonK Offline
                                      KroMignon
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #24

                                      @sitesv said in Executing QProcess in QThread: memory leak:

                                      I don't know, but from this qthread in my main app I emit signal... and it is emitted... slot is from the main thread. QThread starts by start() method.
                                      The problem for me is memory leak only.

                                      For my comprehension of QObject and QThread (cf Threads and QObjects), your implementation is not really Qt friendly.

                                      If I right understand what you want to achieve: you want to run "ping" a regular interval and be informed when ping has failed.

                                      To do this, I would create a QObject class which handles the ping requests and eventually moves this class instance to a dedicated thread to avoid lock on main thread.

                                      Something like:

                                      class PingTester : public QObject
                                      {
                                          Q_OBJECT
                                      
                                      public:
                                          explicit PingTester(QObject* parent = nullptr): QObject(parent), m_timer(new QTimer(this))
                                          {
                                              m_timer->setInterval(30*1000); // per default 30 seconds
                                              m_timer->setSingleShot(false);
                                              connect(m_timer, &QTimer::timeout, this, &PingTester::doPing);
                                          }
                                      
                                          void setInterval(int interval) { m_timer->setInterval(interval); }
                                      
                                      public slots:
                                           void start()
                                           {
                                               if(QThread::currentThrea() != thread())
                                               {
                                                    QTimer::singleShot(this, 0, &PingTester::start);
                                                    return;
                                               }
                                               if(!m_timer->isActive())
                                                   m_timer->start();
                                           }
                                           void stop()
                                           {
                                               if(QThread::currentThrea() != thread())
                                               {
                                                    QTimer::singleShot(this, 0, &PingTester::stop);
                                                    return;
                                               }
                                               if(m_timer->isActive())
                                                   m_timer->stop();
                                           }
                                           
                                      private slots:
                                          void doPing();
                                      
                                      signals:
                                          void pingFailure();
                                          void pingSuccess();
                                      
                                      private:
                                           QTimer* m_timer;
                                      };
                                      

                                      It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. (Sherlock Holmes)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • SGaistS Offline
                                        SGaistS Offline
                                        SGaist
                                        Lifetime Qt Champion
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #25

                                        Hi,

                                        Can you explain why exactly do you need that ping ?

                                        Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
                                        Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • sitesvS Offline
                                          sitesvS Offline
                                          sitesv
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #26

                                          @SGaist
                                          ping needs to check the availability of pc from the internal network. I thought that this is the simplest way to do this.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups
                                          • Search
                                          • Get Qt Extensions
                                          • Unsolved