Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. OS timestamps
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

OS timestamps

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved General and Desktop
14 Posts 3 Posters 824 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    ted19b
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Hello,

    thank you for the reply

    I use version 5.15.0 of Qt on Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS

    for deleting the folder on the command line:
    rm -r dir/

    For deleting the folder with Qt:

    QDir dir(path_directory_to_delete);
    bool isDelete = dir.removeRecursively();
    Q_ASSERT(isDelete);

    thanks

    JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T ted19b

      Hello,

      thank you for the reply

      I use version 5.15.0 of Qt on Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS

      for deleting the folder on the command line:
      rm -r dir/

      For deleting the folder with Qt:

      QDir dir(path_directory_to_delete);
      bool isDelete = dir.removeRecursively();
      Q_ASSERT(isDelete);

      thanks

      JonBJ Offline
      JonBJ Offline
      JonB
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      @ted19b
      Well you can see the implementation at https://code.woboq.org/qt5/qtbase/src/corelib/io/qdir.cpp.html#_ZN4QDir17removeRecursivelyEv

      What is a B timestamp?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Offline
        T Offline
        ted19b
        wrote on last edited by ted19b
        #5

        Hi,

        @JonB Though not specified by POSIX, Linux on EXT4 and FreeBSD on UFS2 store the date of creation (B).

        JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T ted19b

          Hi,

          @JonB Though not specified by POSIX, Linux on EXT4 and FreeBSD on UFS2 store the date of creation (B).

          JonBJ Offline
          JonBJ Offline
          JonB
          wrote on last edited by JonB
          #6

          @ted19b
          In that case, could you explain what the C timestamp is, and how that differs from the B one? M is Modification, A is Access, C is creation and B seems to be Creation too? I am interested :)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Offline
            T Offline
            ted19b
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Hi,

            @JonB POSIX specifies MAC timestamps:

            Each file has three distinct associated timestamps: the time of last data access, the time of last data modification, and the time the file status last changed. These values are returned in the file characteristics structure struct stat, as described in <sys/stat.h>.

            Data access (A) is when the file data is read, data modification (M) when the file data is modified, and file status changed (C) when the file metadata is changed (chown, chmod, new hardlink updating the link count…).

            JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T ted19b

              Hi,

              @JonB POSIX specifies MAC timestamps:

              Each file has three distinct associated timestamps: the time of last data access, the time of last data modification, and the time the file status last changed. These values are returned in the file characteristics structure struct stat, as described in <sys/stat.h>.

              Data access (A) is when the file data is read, data modification (M) when the file data is modified, and file status changed (C) when the file metadata is changed (chown, chmod, new hardlink updating the link count…).

              JonBJ Offline
              JonBJ Offline
              JonB
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              @ted19b
              Sorry I do get MAC, as per stat. What I am not understanding is what your B is and how it differs from C? Is it that the extra B remains fixed as date of creation, while C varies a bit more? TBH I didn't know C changed from e.g. chown, I thought C was your B....

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • JonBJ JonB

                @ted19b
                Sorry I do get MAC, as per stat. What I am not understanding is what your B is and how it differs from C? Is it that the extra B remains fixed as date of creation, while C varies a bit more? TBH I didn't know C changed from e.g. chown, I thought C was your B....

                T Offline
                T Offline
                ted19b
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                @JonB

                sorry for the late reply. Indeed that's the idea. The B records the date of creation of the file and it doesn't change anymore.

                While the C is updated according to the operations we can perform on the file.

                for example: we have a tmp.txt file in a src/ folder.
                copy this file to a dst/ folder will update the C timestamps of the src/ folder

                JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T ted19b

                  @JonB

                  sorry for the late reply. Indeed that's the idea. The B records the date of creation of the file and it doesn't change anymore.

                  While the C is updated according to the operations we can perform on the file.

                  for example: we have a tmp.txt file in a src/ folder.
                  copy this file to a dst/ folder will update the C timestamps of the src/ folder

                  JonBJ Offline
                  JonBJ Offline
                  JonB
                  wrote on last edited by JonB
                  #10

                  @ted19b
                  Thanks for all this information. I am old-time Unix user(!), very familiar with the MAC timestamps, never heard of your B one.

                  So, please help: I am Ubuntu. lsblk -f says my disk is ext4. I don't see an option to ls to display this B stamp, and what system call (like stat) accesses it, please?

                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • JonBJ JonB

                    @ted19b
                    Thanks for all this information. I am old-time Unix user(!), very familiar with the MAC timestamps, never heard of your B one.

                    So, please help: I am Ubuntu. lsblk -f says my disk is ext4. I don't see an option to ls to display this B stamp, and what system call (like stat) accesses it, please?

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    ted19b
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    @JonB

                    I think this article contains the answers to all your questions.

                    https://www.sans.org/blog/understanding-ext4-part-2-timestamps/

                    JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • T ted19b

                      @JonB

                      I think this article contains the answers to all your questions.

                      https://www.sans.org/blog/understanding-ext4-part-2-timestamps/

                      JonBJ Offline
                      JonBJ Offline
                      JonB
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @ted19b
                      Thanks for this. My Ubuntu 20.04's stat is still one version too old to report this B. I didn't want to download anything, I used

                      debugfs -R 'stat <'`stat -c %i /etc/profile`'>' /dev/sda5
                      

                      to see the Birth/crtime. Don't know what you use. Very interesting.

                      Anyway, I imagine like I said you'll want to look at the source code I referenced to follow its behaviour. I admit that glancing I can't see why parent would have its B/crtime changed, presumably that should only happen when something is created and I can't see that. I'd be interested to hear if you analyze/debug the code why that is occurring!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T Offline
                        T Offline
                        ted19b
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        finally after analysing the implementation, the result is rather what I was hoping for, namely

                        parent_dir/ shows that the MC timestamps have been updated.

                        This means that the problem certainly comes from my code.

                        thank you all.

                        For those of you who may be interested in timestamp analysis, especially in the field of security, I think this article may be of interest to you.

                        https://medium.com/@quoscient/mac-b-timestamps-across-posix-implementations-linux-openbsd-freebsd-1e2d5893e4f

                        JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • T ted19b

                          finally after analysing the implementation, the result is rather what I was hoping for, namely

                          parent_dir/ shows that the MC timestamps have been updated.

                          This means that the problem certainly comes from my code.

                          thank you all.

                          For those of you who may be interested in timestamp analysis, especially in the field of security, I think this article may be of interest to you.

                          https://medium.com/@quoscient/mac-b-timestamps-across-posix-implementations-linux-openbsd-freebsd-1e2d5893e4f

                          JonBJ Offline
                          JonBJ Offline
                          JonB
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          @ted19b
                          I'm the person who's interested in this :) Thanks for all your replies/links.

                          This means that the problem certainly comes from my code.

                          Glad you have discovered this. When I looked at the https://code.woboq.org/qt5/qtbase/src/corelib/io/qdir.cpp.html#_ZN4QDir17removeRecursivelyEv implementation I could only see it doing non-creationtime operations, so your findings now correspond :)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups
                          • Search
                          • Get Qt Extensions
                          • Unsolved