Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. creating list with variable number of entries
Qt 6.11 is out! See what's new in the release blog

creating list with variable number of entries

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved General and Desktop
26 Posts 5 Posters 6.1k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mrjjM mrjj

    @mzimmers

    Hi , yes normally a new without delete is a leak but the design for the delegate is that you create editor and
    the View deletes it when finished editing.

    1. you dont assign the parent when you new it
      QLineEdit *ql = new QLineEdit(parent)
      Any widget without a parent becomes a window.

    2. fix 1 and 2 is non issue i think :)

    mzimmersM Offline
    mzimmersM Offline
    mzimmers
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    @mrjj Oh, that's a thing of beauty. Thanks for the reminder on that.

    And you're correct, adding the parent to the creation of the QLineEdit eliminated the new window.

    This issue is mostly fixed now, but there's still a bit of tuning I need to do:

    1. When editing a line, pressing the enter key exits the window. This is logical, but probably not what a lot of users expect. I need to cause it to exit the editor (I think). I think I could fix this by overriding the EditorEvent() method, but I don't know what I'd furnish for the model argument.
    2. It appears that the editor also remains open when the user clicks on a different line. Basically, the same issue as above (I think).

    Thanks again...

    mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mzimmersM mzimmers

      @mrjj Oh, that's a thing of beauty. Thanks for the reminder on that.

      And you're correct, adding the parent to the creation of the QLineEdit eliminated the new window.

      This issue is mostly fixed now, but there's still a bit of tuning I need to do:

      1. When editing a line, pressing the enter key exits the window. This is logical, but probably not what a lot of users expect. I need to cause it to exit the editor (I think). I think I could fix this by overriding the EditorEvent() method, but I don't know what I'd furnish for the model argument.
      2. It appears that the editor also remains open when the user clicks on a different line. Basically, the same issue as above (I think).

      Thanks again...

      mrjjM Offline
      mrjjM Offline
      mrjj
      Lifetime Qt Champion
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      @mzimmers
      Hi
      I don't recall pressing enter would do anything but finish editing so not sure all code is as it should be.
      Can you check your code against
      https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26614678/validating-user-input-in-a-qtableview
      As this is the same you want to do, using a Validator.
      It don't matters its other type of view. The delegate is the same.

      mzimmersM 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • mrjjM mrjj

        @mzimmers
        Hi
        I don't recall pressing enter would do anything but finish editing so not sure all code is as it should be.
        Can you check your code against
        https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26614678/validating-user-input-in-a-qtableview
        As this is the same you want to do, using a Validator.
        It don't matters its other type of view. The delegate is the same.

        mzimmersM Offline
        mzimmersM Offline
        mzimmers
        wrote on last edited by mzimmers
        #19

        My code had some minor differences, but I changed them to match the example, and the behavior is the same.

        I did realize something, though -- I still had my itemClicked() signal calling a slot that used openPersistentEditor(). I'm guessing that this wasn't what I wanted. But when I disabled this, I get no editor at all. Here's where I use the delegate:

            ICdelegate *icDelegate = new ICdelegate;
            ui->listWidgetServers->setItemDelegate(icDelegate);
        

        Does this look OK to you?
        EDIT:
        PS: I didn't mention that I took SGaist's suggestion above to mean that the only method I overrode was createEditor() -- is this correct?
        UPDATE:
        here's my slot for when the item is double-clicked:

        connect(ui->listWidgetServers, &QListWidget::itemDoubleClicked, this, &Informacast::editItem);
        void Informacast::editItem(QListWidgetItem *item)
        {
            Qt::ItemFlags flags;
            flags = item->flags();
            flags |= Qt::ItemIsEditable;
            item->setFlags(Qt::ItemIsEditable);
            ui->listWidgetServers->editItem(item);
        }
        

        Still not editable, though the coloring changes:
        icast.PNG
        I feel that I'm close to getting this to work, but am overlooking something.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • SGaistS Offline
          SGaistS Offline
          SGaist
          Lifetime Qt Champion
          wrote on last edited by
          #20

          AFAIR, items are editable by defaults.

          Did you set the edit triggers ?

          Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
          Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

          mzimmersM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • SGaistS SGaist

            AFAIR, items are editable by defaults.

            Did you set the edit triggers ?

            mzimmersM Offline
            mzimmersM Offline
            mzimmers
            wrote on last edited by mzimmers
            #21

            @SGaist I hate to disagree with you (mostly because you're always right), but here's my slot:

            void Informacast::editItem(QListWidgetItem *item)
            {
                Qt::ItemFlags flags;
                flags = item->flags();
                if ((flags & Qt::ItemIsEditable) == 0)
                {
                    flags |= Qt::ItemIsEditable;
                }
                item->setFlags(Qt::ItemIsEditable);
                ui->listWidgetServers->setEditTriggers(QAbstractItemView::DoubleClicked);
                ui->listWidgetServers->editItem(item);
            }
            

            When I step through this in the debugger, I hit the line where I assign the editable flag.

            To answer your question: no, I hadn't set the edit triggers. But now I am, and the behavior is still the same. In looking at the EditTrigger enums, I don't see another one that I need to set; am I overlooking something?

            EDIT: from a debugging session, it appears that the DoubleClicked was already set.

            JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mzimmersM mzimmers

              @SGaist I hate to disagree with you (mostly because you're always right), but here's my slot:

              void Informacast::editItem(QListWidgetItem *item)
              {
                  Qt::ItemFlags flags;
                  flags = item->flags();
                  if ((flags & Qt::ItemIsEditable) == 0)
                  {
                      flags |= Qt::ItemIsEditable;
                  }
                  item->setFlags(Qt::ItemIsEditable);
                  ui->listWidgetServers->setEditTriggers(QAbstractItemView::DoubleClicked);
                  ui->listWidgetServers->editItem(item);
              }
              

              When I step through this in the debugger, I hit the line where I assign the editable flag.

              To answer your question: no, I hadn't set the edit triggers. But now I am, and the behavior is still the same. In looking at the EditTrigger enums, I don't see another one that I need to set; am I overlooking something?

              EDIT: from a debugging session, it appears that the DoubleClicked was already set.

              JonBJ Offline
              JonBJ Offline
              JonB
              wrote on last edited by JonB
              #22

              @mzimmers said in creating list with variable number of entries:

              item->setFlags(Qt::ItemIsEditable);

              This resets all your flags, to editable only. Yet you earlier picked up the existing flags. I have a feeling you intended

              item->setFlags(flags);
              

              to enable editability? I have no idea whether this is relevant to your issue, it's just a code observation.

              mzimmersM 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • JonBJ JonB

                @mzimmers said in creating list with variable number of entries:

                item->setFlags(Qt::ItemIsEditable);

                This resets all your flags, to editable only. Yet you earlier picked up the existing flags. I have a feeling you intended

                item->setFlags(flags);
                

                to enable editability? I have no idea whether this is relevant to your issue, it's just a code observation.

                mzimmersM Offline
                mzimmersM Offline
                mzimmers
                wrote on last edited by
                #23

                @JonB ding ding ding we have a winner! Good catch there. I was going to ask whether the setFlags worked that way, but I got distracted by all my other mistakes.

                Now, the item is editable, but...my validator doesn't seem to be taking effect. I think I know why, but I'm not sure what to do about it. Here's my class:

                class ICdelegate : public QStyledItemDelegate
                {
                    Q_OBJECT
                private:
                public:
                    explicit ICdelegate(QObject *parent = nullptr) :
                        QStyledItemDelegate(parent)
                    {
                    }
                    QLineEdit *createEditor(QWidget *parent, const QStyleOptionViewItem &option,
                                          const QModelIndex &index) const override
                    {
                        // some junk code to disable compiler warnings about unused variables.
                        const QModelIndex xxx(index);
                        if (xxx == index)
                        {
                            ;
                        }
                        const QStyleOptionViewItem yyy(option);
                
                        QLineEdit *qle;
                        qle = new QLineEdit(parent);
                        qle->setValidator(new IpValidator);
                
                        return (qle);
                    }
                };
                

                Am I doing something wrong with qle? I tried making it a member variable, but got a compiler error.

                Thanks...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • SGaistS Offline
                  SGaistS Offline
                  SGaist
                  Lifetime Qt Champion
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #24

                  Try with:

                  
                  qle->setValidator(new IpValidator(qle));
                  

                  Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
                  Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                  mzimmersM 1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • SGaistS SGaist

                    Try with:

                    
                    qle->setValidator(new IpValidator(qle));
                    
                    mzimmersM Offline
                    mzimmersM Offline
                    mzimmers
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    @SGaist another winner! The validator is now invoked. So, do I understand this to mean that the call to setValidator isn't sufficient to associate the QLineEdit with its validator; the validator uses its parent as the basis for what to operate on?

                    As a side benefit, pressing "enter" no longer dismisses the dialog. I think this problem is solved (but I'm not going to so mark it quite yet).

                    Thanks to everyone who helped with this.

                    JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • mzimmersM mzimmers

                      @SGaist another winner! The validator is now invoked. So, do I understand this to mean that the call to setValidator isn't sufficient to associate the QLineEdit with its validator; the validator uses its parent as the basis for what to operate on?

                      As a side benefit, pressing "enter" no longer dismisses the dialog. I think this problem is solved (but I'm not going to so mark it quite yet).

                      Thanks to everyone who helped with this.

                      JonBJ Offline
                      JonBJ Offline
                      JonB
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #26

                      @mzimmers
                      I'm waiting for The Master's answer on this too :) I looked up the docs and I do not see where it indicates this is required, and OK your validator may leak but I don't see it will die...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups
                      • Search
                      • Get Qt Extensions
                      • Unsolved