Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. General talk
  3. The Lounge
  4. How large SSD should I buy for open source developing?
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

How large SSD should I buy for open source developing?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved The Lounge
19 Posts 9 Posters 3.0k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • fcarneyF Offline
    fcarneyF Offline
    fcarney
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @jronald said in How large SSD should I buy for open source developing?:

    nuclear polution problem in japan

    ? Where did you here this? They check for radioactivity at most ports in most countries now. This is part of preventing nuclear proliferation. I highly doubt that it would be in their exports.

    C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

    Kent-DorfmanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • fcarneyF fcarney

      @jronald said in How large SSD should I buy for open source developing?:

      nuclear polution problem in japan

      ? Where did you here this? They check for radioactivity at most ports in most countries now. This is part of preventing nuclear proliferation. I highly doubt that it would be in their exports.

      Kent-DorfmanK Offline
      Kent-DorfmanK Offline
      Kent-Dorfman
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      @fcarney said in How large SSD should I buy for open source developing?:

      ? Where did you here this? They check for radioactivity at most ports in most countries now. This is part of preventing nuclear proliferation. I highly doubt that it would be in their exports.

      Because of the way the media works in Japan, people don't realize how bad Fukushima really was. In the weeks that followed, the background atmospheric radiation levels went up significantly around the globe. There is a lot of monitoring of atmospheric radiation here because shale rock fracturing is a way they reclaim natural gas from the these rocks, and the shales are slightly radio-active due to uranium decay in them, which out-gasses as radon. Japan produce exports may have some low-level contamination in them based on what metals are present, but could not say how much, or for how long it would be a problem.

      I light my way forward with the fires of all the bridges I've burned behind me.

      kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Kent-DorfmanK Offline
        Kent-DorfmanK Offline
        Kent-Dorfman
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        re ssd for development...I personally discourage ssd for development, but only use them for relatively static operating system images. development does a lot of writing on disks and SSDs have a much shorter expected lifetime than rotational media. I'm currently working on spacecraft flight systems and we MUST use SSD for non-volatile storage. Hardenning the systems against cosmic radiation events is a significant portion of what goes thru my head on a daily basis at work. All you can really do is keep multiple images and CRC/ECC the hell out of everything. Then it is still a non trivial statistical possibility that a stray ray will corrupt data in a non-fixable way.

        I light my way forward with the fires of all the bridges I've burned behind me.

        mrjjM jsulmJ 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • Kent-DorfmanK Kent-Dorfman

          re ssd for development...I personally discourage ssd for development, but only use them for relatively static operating system images. development does a lot of writing on disks and SSDs have a much shorter expected lifetime than rotational media. I'm currently working on spacecraft flight systems and we MUST use SSD for non-volatile storage. Hardenning the systems against cosmic radiation events is a significant portion of what goes thru my head on a daily basis at work. All you can really do is keep multiple images and CRC/ECC the hell out of everything. Then it is still a non trivial statistical possibility that a stray ray will corrupt data in a non-fixable way.

          mrjjM Offline
          mrjjM Offline
          mrjj
          Lifetime Qt Champion
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          @Kent-Dorfman
          Just as a note:
          I been using SSD for heavy c++ compiling for years and also running virtual machines on top of them. Its correct that the first Gen had low write count but newer m.2 disks take terabytes of writes with no issues.

          https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/endurance-test-of-samsung-850-pro-comes-to-an-end-after-9100tb-of-writes.html

          1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • Kent-DorfmanK Kent-Dorfman

            @fcarney said in How large SSD should I buy for open source developing?:

            ? Where did you here this? They check for radioactivity at most ports in most countries now. This is part of preventing nuclear proliferation. I highly doubt that it would be in their exports.

            Because of the way the media works in Japan, people don't realize how bad Fukushima really was. In the weeks that followed, the background atmospheric radiation levels went up significantly around the globe. There is a lot of monitoring of atmospheric radiation here because shale rock fracturing is a way they reclaim natural gas from the these rocks, and the shales are slightly radio-active due to uranium decay in them, which out-gasses as radon. Japan produce exports may have some low-level contamination in them based on what metals are present, but could not say how much, or for how long it would be a problem.

            kshegunovK Offline
            kshegunovK Offline
            kshegunov
            Moderators
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            @Kent-Dorfman said in How large SSD should I buy for open source developing?:

            Because of the way the media works in Japan, people don't realize how bad Fukushima really was.

            Not as bad as you make it sound, much worse than it could've been if tepco have handled it better ... in any case most of the radiation release was through leaching into the pacific, not through atmospheric dispersal (you don't have full exposure of the reactor vessel, but a partial meltdown). Now they have no idea what to do with the water they've been pumping through the reactors, so they just store it in tanks ... like that's going to last ...

            In the weeks that followed, the background atmospheric radiation levels went up significantly around the globe.

            Not really. They went up in and around the pacific, not at all much in western asia, the middle east, africa or europe. Only trace amounts of I-131 were detected here in europe way below any significant thresholds. Plus we don't need no stinkin' japanese reactors to irradiate us, we have Russia, which occasionally does that ...

            Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • Kent-DorfmanK Offline
              Kent-DorfmanK Offline
              Kent-Dorfman
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              @mrjj -- I'll stick with rotational for non-persistent data.
              @kshegunov - it certainly upped the levels here on the east coast of the US. Didn't even want to mention that little ukranian mishap. I would love to have a real sample of Chernobylite though. Trinity site glass just isn't the same. LOL And of course you are right about the Pacific water contamination...

              I light my way forward with the fires of all the bridges I've burned behind me.

              kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Kent-DorfmanK Kent-Dorfman

                @mrjj -- I'll stick with rotational for non-persistent data.
                @kshegunov - it certainly upped the levels here on the east coast of the US. Didn't even want to mention that little ukranian mishap. I would love to have a real sample of Chernobylite though. Trinity site glass just isn't the same. LOL And of course you are right about the Pacific water contamination...

                kshegunovK Offline
                kshegunovK Offline
                kshegunov
                Moderators
                wrote on last edited by kshegunov
                #16

                @Kent-Dorfman said in How large SSD should I buy for open source developing?:

                it certainly upped the levels here on the east coast of the US.

                Eh, maybe. I don't have data, but I'd take a guess on "marginally".

                Didn't even want to mention that little ukranian mishap.

                Actually I was thinking of more recent times when I wrote my comment. Like the friendly Ru-106 we got two years ago ...

                I would love to have a real sample of Chernobylite though. Trinity site glass just isn't the same.

                Nobody makes it as good as in the soviet union, I admit. Although, you can indeed sample it - they do accept tourists now, and east of the civilized world we don't judge people by the color of their money; green is perfectly fine. ;)

                Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Kent-DorfmanK Kent-Dorfman

                  re ssd for development...I personally discourage ssd for development, but only use them for relatively static operating system images. development does a lot of writing on disks and SSDs have a much shorter expected lifetime than rotational media. I'm currently working on spacecraft flight systems and we MUST use SSD for non-volatile storage. Hardenning the systems against cosmic radiation events is a significant portion of what goes thru my head on a daily basis at work. All you can really do is keep multiple images and CRC/ECC the hell out of everything. Then it is still a non trivial statistical possibility that a stray ray will corrupt data in a non-fixable way.

                  jsulmJ Offline
                  jsulmJ Offline
                  jsulm
                  Lifetime Qt Champion
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  @Kent-Dorfman I never had any issues with SSDs. And one of the reasons why developers should use VCS is to have back-ups - a failing SSD is then a non issue...

                  https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mossma11n
                    Banned
                    wrote on last edited by Mossma11n
                    #18
                    This post is deleted!
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Strobe1l
                      Banned
                      wrote on last edited by mrjj
                      #19
                      This post is deleted!
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups
                      • Search
                      • Get Qt Extensions
                      • Unsolved