QThread with multiple methods

JohnCu

@J-Hilk Yes, of course, there is no problem with emitting a signal from workers thread, I do it when computations are done. But, take look at this code from gui class:

emit onConnecttoHardware();

// if connected to hardware
QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Hardware connected");

First i launch action, then i show, that it is finished. however, after emitting a signal to start the action, the main thread goes straight to show QMessageBox, which can not be prompted before computations are done... I need to wait at the first line of this code to obtain allDone signal and have my gui responsible while waiting, because i need to plot some results, which are also prompted by a signal emitted from workers thread. If I do as you suggested, main thread displays messagebox immediately, before action finished (allDone signal is emitted)...

aha_1980

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

I need to wait at the first line of this code to obtain allDone signal and have my gui responsible while waiting,

And this, you have to understand, is a discrepance.

You cannot wait in GUI threads.

What you probably want to do is, to disallow user input until the allDone signal is received. And that's how it's usually done in professional apps.

You most likely also want your user to be able to abort the process, in case something goes wrong. All that is impossible if the GUI thread stucks.

Regards

J.Hilk

@JohnCu

add the following signals to your worker

signals:
	void on_enable_buttons();
	void update_plot();
//new
       void onHardwareConnected();
       void onOperationSuccesfull

Connects in your App.cpp

connect(&worker, &Worker:: onHardwareConnected, this, App:: onRun);
connect(&worker, &Worker:: onHardwareConnected, this, [=]()->void{QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Hardware connected");});
connect(&worker, &Worker:: onOperationSuccesfull, this, [=]()->void{
     QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Operation succesful");
     enable_all_buttons();
});

void App::on_Run_triggered()
{
	disable_all_buttons();
        emit onConnecttoHardware();
	QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Prepare hardware");
}

something like this could work

JohnCu

@aha_1980 said in QThread with multiple methods:

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

I need to wait at the first line of this code to obtain allDone signal and have my gui responsible while waiting,

And this, you have to understand, is a discrepance.

You cannot wait in GUI threads.

What you probably want to do is, to disallow user input until the allDone signal is received. And that's how it's usually done in professional apps.

You most likely also want your user to be able to abort the process, in case something goes wrong. All that is impossible if the GUI thread stucks.

Regards

Yes, that is exactly what I want. I know, that I cannot block a GUI thread. So how would you solve this problem? I just want this thread to respond for incoming signals, which will finally allow to step it to subsequent line. I want to tell compiler "stay here, process incoming signals and continue to subsequent line (within this method), as soon as indicated signal will be emitted"

@aha_1980 said in QThread with multiple methods:

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

I need to wait at the first line of this code to obtain allDone signal and have my gui responsible while waiting,

And this, you have to understand, is a discrepance.

You cannot wait in GUI threads.

What you probably want to do is, to disallow user input until the allDone signal is received. And that's how it's usually done in professional apps.

You most likely also want your user to be able to abort the process, in case something goes wrong. All that is impossible if the GUI thread stucks.

Regards

Thanks, it would work if there is only one function called from on_Run_triggered() method, but there are more:

void App::on_Run_triggered()

{
disable_all_buttons();
QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Prepare hardware");

emit onConnecttoHardware();

// if connected to hardware
QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Hardware connected");

emit onRun();
		
QMessageBox::information(this, "Message", "Operation succesful");

}

The problem is, that I cannot emit onRun() before I am not sure if hardware was connected properly... Based on your responses, the only way to make it work (besides QEventLoop, that I mentioned before, however it is not safe) would be to split on_Run_triggered() method and place rest of the code into another method, which would be called via slot after getting allDone signal? So after calling first method, a main gui thread will exit on_Run_triggered() and will be waiting for subsequent signal emissions i.e. allDone. am I right?

I think, a similar problem was described here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3556421/blocked-waiting-for-a-asynchronous-qt-signal

J.Hilk

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

would be to split on_Run_triggered() method and place rest of the code into another method, which would be called via slot after getting allDone signal? So after calling first method, a main gui thread will exit on_Run_triggered() and will be waiting for subsequent signal emissions i.e. allDone. am I right?

In essence, yes!

JohnCu

@J-Hilk I wanted to avoid such approach, because it will totally ruin my code structure, but if it is necessary...

aha_1980

@JohnCu

I'm about giving up with you!

I want to tell compiler "stay here, process incoming signals and continue to subsequent line (within this method), as soon as indicated signal will be emitted"

And that is exactly what is not possible. Forget it.

I think, a similar problem was described here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3556421/blocked-waiting-for-a-asynchronous-qt-signal

Don't do that. You will regret it.

As said multiple times: don't block the GUI thread. Let it run free.

Regards

JohnCu

@aha_1980 I am sorry for testing your patience ! I will locate the code in a separate methods, in order not to block gui thread. However, thank you for your advice!

aha_1980

@JohnCu No problem.

I know making your head up with async programming is hard in the beginning.

But it will get better :)

JKSH

@JohnCu said in QThread with multiple methods:

@J-Hilk I wanted to avoid such approach, because it will totally ruin my code structure, but if it is necessary...

It is very necessary. Do not try to take the easy way out.

Think of it this way: You are not ruining your code structure, you are improving it to become a responsive, event-driven structure.

To do asynchronous/event-driven programming (responding to signals/events from other threads), you must think differently and structure your code differently.