Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. QT deployed executable crashes on some computers
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

QT deployed executable crashes on some computers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved General and Desktop
42 Posts 9 Posters 12.6k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • fcarneyF Offline
    fcarneyF Offline
    fcarney
    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @Lati said in QT deployed executable crashes on some computers:

    programXRootDirectory

    It would be interesting to know what the data type is for this variable. I could not get QString to crash or misbehave.

    {
            char* null = nullptr;
    
            QString test = "hallo";
            qInfo() << "before init null";
            test = QString(null);
            qInfo() << test;
            qInfo() << "after init null";
    
            QString test2 = "hallo again";
            qInfo() << "before assign null";
            test2 = null;
            qInfo() << test2;
            qInfo() << "after assign null";
        }
    

    C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • fcarneyF fcarney

      @Lati said in QT deployed executable crashes on some computers:

      programXRootDirectory

      It would be interesting to know what the data type is for this variable. I could not get QString to crash or misbehave.

      {
              char* null = nullptr;
      
              QString test = "hallo";
              qInfo() << "before init null";
              test = QString(null);
              qInfo() << test;
              qInfo() << "after init null";
      
              QString test2 = "hallo again";
              qInfo() << "before assign null";
              test2 = null;
              qInfo() << test2;
              qInfo() << "after assign null";
          }
      
      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lati
      wrote on last edited by Lati
      #32

      @fcarney
      You can reproduce the issue with the following example (at least it crashes on my computer:)):

      main.cpp

      #include "mainwindow.h"
      #include <QApplication>
      
      int main(int argc, char *argv[])
      {
          QApplication a(argc, argv);
          MainWindow w;
          w.show();
          return a.exec();
      }
      

      mainWindow.h:

      #ifndef MAINWINDOW_H
      #define MAINWINDOW_H
      
      #include <QMainWindow>
      
      QT_BEGIN_NAMESPACE
      namespace Ui { class MainWindow; }
      QT_END_NAMESPACE
      
      class MainWindow : public QMainWindow
      {
          Q_OBJECT
      
      public:
          MainWindow(QWidget *parent = nullptr);
          ~MainWindow();
      
          // Senex root directory
          std::string notExistEnvVar;
      
      private:
          Ui::MainWindow *ui;
      };
      #endif // MAINWINDOW_H
      

      mainWindow.cpp

      #include "mainwindow.h"
      #include "ui_mainwindow.h"
      
      MainWindow::MainWindow(QWidget *parent)
          : QMainWindow(parent)
          , ui(new Ui::MainWindow)
      {
          ui->setupUi(this);
      
          notExistEnvVar = getenv("notExistEnvVar");
      }
      
      MainWindow::~MainWindow()
      {
          delete ui;
      }
      

      Compiled with MSVC2015 64bit.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • fcarneyF Offline
        fcarneyF Offline
        fcarney
        wrote on last edited by fcarney
        #33

        You are getting an exception because you are assigning nullptr to std::string. Assign to

        char* ptr = getenv("notExistEnvVar");
        if(ptr != nullptr)
          notExistEnvVar = ptr;
        

        getenv is not crashing

        Edit:
        or use QString

        QString str = getenv("notExistEnvVar");
        

        C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

        JonBJ L 2 Replies Last reply
        2
        • fcarneyF fcarney

          You are getting an exception because you are assigning nullptr to std::string. Assign to

          char* ptr = getenv("notExistEnvVar");
          if(ptr != nullptr)
            notExistEnvVar = ptr;
          

          getenv is not crashing

          Edit:
          or use QString

          QString str = getenv("notExistEnvVar");
          
          JonBJ Offline
          JonBJ Offline
          JonB
          wrote on last edited by
          #34

          @fcarney Thank you :)

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • JonBJ Offline
            JonBJ Offline
            JonB
            wrote on last edited by
            #35

            For std::string s = nullptr, see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10771864/assign-a-nullptr-to-a-stdstring-is-safe/10771938. Accepted answer:

            Requires: s shall not be a null pointer.

            Since the standard does not ask the library to throw an exception when this particular requirement is not met, it would appear that passing a null pointer provoked undefined behavior.

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • fcarneyF Offline
              fcarneyF Offline
              fcarney
              wrote on last edited by
              #36

              @JonB said in QT deployed executable crashes on some computers:

              undefined

              !!!UNDEFINED!!!
              The end is nigh!

              Good find!

              C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • JonBJ JonB

                @Lati said in QT deployed executable crashes on some computers:

                It is very easy to test by writing a small application.

                char *p = getenv("ProgramXROOT");
                // or
                char *p = getenv("AnythingElseWhichDoesntExist");
                

                won't crash. It will set p to NULL/nullptr.

                If the program continues and does not check for that, assuming that p will not be null, it may crash. That is all @Pablo-J-Rogina and I are saying.

                Pablo J. RoginaP Offline
                Pablo J. RoginaP Offline
                Pablo J. Rogina
                wrote on last edited by
                #37

                @JonB said in QT deployed executable crashes on some computers:

                won't crash. It will set p to NULL/nullptr.

                The problem is not the assignment... the problem comes once you have assigned NULL to the pointer and then you try using it

                Upvote the answer(s) that helped you solve the issue
                Use "Topic Tools" button to mark your post as Solved
                Add screenshots via postimage.org
                Don't ask support requests via chat/PM. Please use the forum so others can benefit from the solution in the future

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • fcarneyF fcarney

                  You are getting an exception because you are assigning nullptr to std::string. Assign to

                  char* ptr = getenv("notExistEnvVar");
                  if(ptr != nullptr)
                    notExistEnvVar = ptr;
                  

                  getenv is not crashing

                  Edit:
                  or use QString

                  QString str = getenv("notExistEnvVar");
                  
                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lati
                  wrote on last edited by Lati
                  #38

                  @fcarney

                  Obviously, the person who wrote the library didn't know this (to be honest, I didn't know it as well, I have never used getenv). And this is how bugs happened, right? :)

                  But interesting thing is that there is no sign about the crash and no-one had an idea about it (including me). I would still look at the error somewhere else if I wouldn't test the code on one of the problem computer.

                  Anyway, thank you for the clarification.

                  JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lati

                    @fcarney

                    Obviously, the person who wrote the library didn't know this (to be honest, I didn't know it as well, I have never used getenv). And this is how bugs happened, right? :)

                    But interesting thing is that there is no sign about the crash and no-one had an idea about it (including me). I would still look at the error somewhere else if I wouldn't test the code on one of the problem computer.

                    Anyway, thank you for the clarification.

                    JonBJ Offline
                    JonBJ Offline
                    JonB
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #39

                    @Lati
                    For the record, getenv() has been in the C runtime libraries since the 1970s(!) There has to be a way for it to tell you that the selected environment variable does not exist (without crashing!), and that is of course by returning 0. I and millions of other coders have been using that behaviour ever since :)

                    In your case, whoever wrote the code which does not check for that will doubtless have been working in an environment where that ProgramXROOT variable did always exist, and hence never witnessed the unanticipated behaviour.

                    OOI, how have you resolved this? Did you actually change that library's code to fix and recompile, or have you just told your end users they must have that environment variable defined?

                    jsulmJ L 2 Replies Last reply
                    1
                    • JonBJ JonB

                      @Lati
                      For the record, getenv() has been in the C runtime libraries since the 1970s(!) There has to be a way for it to tell you that the selected environment variable does not exist (without crashing!), and that is of course by returning 0. I and millions of other coders have been using that behaviour ever since :)

                      In your case, whoever wrote the code which does not check for that will doubtless have been working in an environment where that ProgramXROOT variable did always exist, and hence never witnessed the unanticipated behaviour.

                      OOI, how have you resolved this? Did you actually change that library's code to fix and recompile, or have you just told your end users they must have that environment variable defined?

                      jsulmJ Online
                      jsulmJ Online
                      jsulm
                      Lifetime Qt Champion
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #40

                      @JonB @Lati
                      Yes, "man getenv" shows this:
                      "RETURN VALUE
                      The getenv() function returns a pointer to the value in the environment, or NULL if there is no match."
                      It is the responsibility of the caller to check its return value and reacting accordingly...

                      https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • JonBJ JonB

                        @Lati
                        For the record, getenv() has been in the C runtime libraries since the 1970s(!) There has to be a way for it to tell you that the selected environment variable does not exist (without crashing!), and that is of course by returning 0. I and millions of other coders have been using that behaviour ever since :)

                        In your case, whoever wrote the code which does not check for that will doubtless have been working in an environment where that ProgramXROOT variable did always exist, and hence never witnessed the unanticipated behaviour.

                        OOI, how have you resolved this? Did you actually change that library's code to fix and recompile, or have you just told your end users they must have that environment variable defined?

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lati
                        wrote on last edited by Lati
                        #41

                        @JonB I am not one of that millions of coders (or even if I used it, I never had problems).

                        In the code, I replaced the getenv part using _dupenv_s as following (which will be valid with the next release):

                            char* buf = nullptr;
                            size_t sz = 0;
                            if (_dupenv_s(&buf, &sz, "programXROOT") == 0 && buf != nullptr)
                            {
                                programXRootDirectory = buf;
                                free(buf);
                            }
                            else
                            {
                                QMessageBox msgBox;
                                msgBox.setText("Environmental variable is missing!");
                                msgBox.exec();
                            }
                        

                        Actually, after installation of this application, user has to create this environmental variable before starting the application. And seems like all the users have created the variable and there was no issue so far. But if a user would forget about this, it would be nightmare to find out the reason.

                        JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lati

                          @JonB I am not one of that millions of coders (or even if I used it, I never had problems).

                          In the code, I replaced the getenv part using _dupenv_s as following (which will be valid with the next release):

                              char* buf = nullptr;
                              size_t sz = 0;
                              if (_dupenv_s(&buf, &sz, "programXROOT") == 0 && buf != nullptr)
                              {
                                  programXRootDirectory = buf;
                                  free(buf);
                              }
                              else
                              {
                                  QMessageBox msgBox;
                                  msgBox.setText("Environmental variable is missing!");
                                  msgBox.exec();
                              }
                          

                          Actually, after installation of this application, user has to create this environmental variable before starting the application. And seems like all the users have created the variable and there was no issue so far. But if a user would forget about this, it would be nightmare to find out the reason.

                          JonBJ Offline
                          JonBJ Offline
                          JonB
                          wrote on last edited by JonB
                          #42

                          @Lati
                          Again for the record, the _dupenv_s (which btw is MSVC-only) you mention has nothing to do with the issue you are talking about. The extra parameters it takes are to do with copying the value, if found, into your own buffer. If it's not found:

                          If the variable is not found, then buffer is set to NULL, numberOfElements is set to 0, and the return value is 0 because this situation is not considered to be an error condition.

                          So the issue will rear its head again if code later tries to dereference the buf from the &buf passed in. Just as with the return result from getenv().

                          Purely as a by-the-by, I presume you are aware in the code you show (which perhaps is only intended as an example):

                                  programXRootDirectory = buf;
                                  free(buf);
                          

                          This would not be a good idea --- programXRootDirectory is left pointing to freed memory! You'll get a different error/crash/behaviour if you then dereference that :)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2

                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups
                          • Search
                          • Get Qt Extensions
                          • Unsolved